Cargando…

The Epidemiology of Respiratory Failure in the United States 2002–2017: A Serial Cross-Sectional Study

OBJECTIVES: Respiratory failure with mechanical ventilation is a limited labor-intensive resource that is associated with high mortality. Understanding the longitudinal national epidemiology is essential for the organization of healthcare resources. DESIGN: Serial cross-sectional study. SETTING: The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kempker, Jordan A., Abril, Maria K., Chen, Yunyun, Kramer, Michael R., Waller, Lance A., Martin, Greg S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7314331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32695994
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000128
_version_ 1783550044940533760
author Kempker, Jordan A.
Abril, Maria K.
Chen, Yunyun
Kramer, Michael R.
Waller, Lance A.
Martin, Greg S.
author_facet Kempker, Jordan A.
Abril, Maria K.
Chen, Yunyun
Kramer, Michael R.
Waller, Lance A.
Martin, Greg S.
author_sort Kempker, Jordan A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Respiratory failure with mechanical ventilation is a limited labor-intensive resource that is associated with high mortality. Understanding the longitudinal national epidemiology is essential for the organization of healthcare resources. DESIGN: Serial cross-sectional study. SETTING: The 2002–2017 Healthcare Utilization Project’s National Inpatient Sample datasets. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS: We use six diagnosis codes and five procedural codes from International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification, and 19 diagnosis codes and 15 procedures codes from International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification to examine national epidemiology of different case definitions for respiratory failure. RESULTS: In the United States in 2017, there were an estimated 1,146,195 discharges with a diagnosis of respiratory failure and procedural code for mechanical ventilation, with an average length of stay of 10.5 days and hospital charge of $158,443. Over the study period, there was an 83% increase in incidence from 249 to 455 cases per 100,000 adults with a 48% decrease in hospital mortality from 34% to 23%. Exploring a case definition that captures only diagnosis codes for respiratory failure, there was a 197% increase in annual incidence, from 429 to 1,275 cases per 100,000 adults with a 57% decrease in hospital mortality from 28% to 12%. For invasive mechanical ventilation without a requisite diagnosis code, there was no change in incidence over the study period, with the 2017 incidence at 359 cases per 100,000 adults, but a 19% decrease in hospital mortality from 37% to 30%. For the noninvasive mechanical ventilation procedural codes, there was a 437% increase in incidence from 41 to 220 cases per 100,000 adults, with a 38% decrease in hospital mortality from 16% to 10%. CONCLUSIONS: Examining different case definitions for respiratory failure, there was a large increase in the population incidence and decrease in the hospital mortality for respiratory failure diagnosis codes with more modest changes procedural codes for invasive mechanical ventilation. There was a large increase in incidence of noninvasive mechanical ventilation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7314331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73143312020-06-25 The Epidemiology of Respiratory Failure in the United States 2002–2017: A Serial Cross-Sectional Study Kempker, Jordan A. Abril, Maria K. Chen, Yunyun Kramer, Michael R. Waller, Lance A. Martin, Greg S. Crit Care Explor Observational Study OBJECTIVES: Respiratory failure with mechanical ventilation is a limited labor-intensive resource that is associated with high mortality. Understanding the longitudinal national epidemiology is essential for the organization of healthcare resources. DESIGN: Serial cross-sectional study. SETTING: The 2002–2017 Healthcare Utilization Project’s National Inpatient Sample datasets. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS: We use six diagnosis codes and five procedural codes from International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification, and 19 diagnosis codes and 15 procedures codes from International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification to examine national epidemiology of different case definitions for respiratory failure. RESULTS: In the United States in 2017, there were an estimated 1,146,195 discharges with a diagnosis of respiratory failure and procedural code for mechanical ventilation, with an average length of stay of 10.5 days and hospital charge of $158,443. Over the study period, there was an 83% increase in incidence from 249 to 455 cases per 100,000 adults with a 48% decrease in hospital mortality from 34% to 23%. Exploring a case definition that captures only diagnosis codes for respiratory failure, there was a 197% increase in annual incidence, from 429 to 1,275 cases per 100,000 adults with a 57% decrease in hospital mortality from 28% to 12%. For invasive mechanical ventilation without a requisite diagnosis code, there was no change in incidence over the study period, with the 2017 incidence at 359 cases per 100,000 adults, but a 19% decrease in hospital mortality from 37% to 30%. For the noninvasive mechanical ventilation procedural codes, there was a 437% increase in incidence from 41 to 220 cases per 100,000 adults, with a 38% decrease in hospital mortality from 16% to 10%. CONCLUSIONS: Examining different case definitions for respiratory failure, there was a large increase in the population incidence and decrease in the hospital mortality for respiratory failure diagnosis codes with more modest changes procedural codes for invasive mechanical ventilation. There was a large increase in incidence of noninvasive mechanical ventilation. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7314331/ /pubmed/32695994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000128 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Observational Study
Kempker, Jordan A.
Abril, Maria K.
Chen, Yunyun
Kramer, Michael R.
Waller, Lance A.
Martin, Greg S.
The Epidemiology of Respiratory Failure in the United States 2002–2017: A Serial Cross-Sectional Study
title The Epidemiology of Respiratory Failure in the United States 2002–2017: A Serial Cross-Sectional Study
title_full The Epidemiology of Respiratory Failure in the United States 2002–2017: A Serial Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr The Epidemiology of Respiratory Failure in the United States 2002–2017: A Serial Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed The Epidemiology of Respiratory Failure in the United States 2002–2017: A Serial Cross-Sectional Study
title_short The Epidemiology of Respiratory Failure in the United States 2002–2017: A Serial Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort epidemiology of respiratory failure in the united states 2002–2017: a serial cross-sectional study
topic Observational Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7314331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32695994
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000128
work_keys_str_mv AT kempkerjordana theepidemiologyofrespiratoryfailureintheunitedstates20022017aserialcrosssectionalstudy
AT abrilmariak theepidemiologyofrespiratoryfailureintheunitedstates20022017aserialcrosssectionalstudy
AT chenyunyun theepidemiologyofrespiratoryfailureintheunitedstates20022017aserialcrosssectionalstudy
AT kramermichaelr theepidemiologyofrespiratoryfailureintheunitedstates20022017aserialcrosssectionalstudy
AT wallerlancea theepidemiologyofrespiratoryfailureintheunitedstates20022017aserialcrosssectionalstudy
AT martingregs theepidemiologyofrespiratoryfailureintheunitedstates20022017aserialcrosssectionalstudy
AT kempkerjordana epidemiologyofrespiratoryfailureintheunitedstates20022017aserialcrosssectionalstudy
AT abrilmariak epidemiologyofrespiratoryfailureintheunitedstates20022017aserialcrosssectionalstudy
AT chenyunyun epidemiologyofrespiratoryfailureintheunitedstates20022017aserialcrosssectionalstudy
AT kramermichaelr epidemiologyofrespiratoryfailureintheunitedstates20022017aserialcrosssectionalstudy
AT wallerlancea epidemiologyofrespiratoryfailureintheunitedstates20022017aserialcrosssectionalstudy
AT martingregs epidemiologyofrespiratoryfailureintheunitedstates20022017aserialcrosssectionalstudy