Cargando…

Balance function after cochlear implant and inner ear anomaly: Comparison of dynamic posturography

INTRODUCTION: Patients with sensorineural hearing loss suffer concomitant vestibular dysfunction that is more prevalent in patients with inner ear anomaly and could be aggravated with cochlear implantation. To assess the vestibular dysfunction in patients with cochlear implantation, we compared thei...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hosseinzadeh, Farideh, Asghari, Alimohamad, Moradi‐Lakeh, Maziar, Farhadi, Mohammad, Daneshi, Ahmad, Mohseni, Mohammad, Mohammadi, S.Saeed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7314490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32596497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.394
_version_ 1783550070386327552
author Hosseinzadeh, Farideh
Asghari, Alimohamad
Moradi‐Lakeh, Maziar
Farhadi, Mohammad
Daneshi, Ahmad
Mohseni, Mohammad
Mohammadi, S.Saeed
author_facet Hosseinzadeh, Farideh
Asghari, Alimohamad
Moradi‐Lakeh, Maziar
Farhadi, Mohammad
Daneshi, Ahmad
Mohseni, Mohammad
Mohammadi, S.Saeed
author_sort Hosseinzadeh, Farideh
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Patients with sensorineural hearing loss suffer concomitant vestibular dysfunction that is more prevalent in patients with inner ear anomaly and could be aggravated with cochlear implantation. To assess the vestibular dysfunction in patients with cochlear implantation, we compared their results with those of patients with and without inner ear anomaly. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a historical cohort study lasting for 20 years on 50 patients with cochlear implantation. All patients underwent dynamic posturography and Bruininks‐Oseretsky Test. RESULTS: Twenty‐two (44%) of the participants showed some types of inner ear anomaly. The frequency of abnormal Bruininks‐Oseretsky Test was 45.5% and 10.7% (P = .005, odds ratio [OR] = 6.9). Abnormal composite was seen in 77.3% and 21.4%, respectively (P < .001; OR = 12.5). The mean strategy score in the fifth condition of the sensory organization test was 25.0 ± 20.4 in patients with inner ear anomaly, whereas it was 44.1 ± 18.9 in those without it (P = .001). CONCLUSION: Balance capability in cochlear implantation patients with inner ear anomaly compared to those without inner ear anomaly was worse. More vestibular rehabilitation treatment plans are suggested for these patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7314490
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73144902020-06-25 Balance function after cochlear implant and inner ear anomaly: Comparison of dynamic posturography Hosseinzadeh, Farideh Asghari, Alimohamad Moradi‐Lakeh, Maziar Farhadi, Mohammad Daneshi, Ahmad Mohseni, Mohammad Mohammadi, S.Saeed Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience INTRODUCTION: Patients with sensorineural hearing loss suffer concomitant vestibular dysfunction that is more prevalent in patients with inner ear anomaly and could be aggravated with cochlear implantation. To assess the vestibular dysfunction in patients with cochlear implantation, we compared their results with those of patients with and without inner ear anomaly. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a historical cohort study lasting for 20 years on 50 patients with cochlear implantation. All patients underwent dynamic posturography and Bruininks‐Oseretsky Test. RESULTS: Twenty‐two (44%) of the participants showed some types of inner ear anomaly. The frequency of abnormal Bruininks‐Oseretsky Test was 45.5% and 10.7% (P = .005, odds ratio [OR] = 6.9). Abnormal composite was seen in 77.3% and 21.4%, respectively (P < .001; OR = 12.5). The mean strategy score in the fifth condition of the sensory organization test was 25.0 ± 20.4 in patients with inner ear anomaly, whereas it was 44.1 ± 18.9 in those without it (P = .001). CONCLUSION: Balance capability in cochlear implantation patients with inner ear anomaly compared to those without inner ear anomaly was worse. More vestibular rehabilitation treatment plans are suggested for these patients. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7314490/ /pubmed/32596497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.394 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The Triological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience
Hosseinzadeh, Farideh
Asghari, Alimohamad
Moradi‐Lakeh, Maziar
Farhadi, Mohammad
Daneshi, Ahmad
Mohseni, Mohammad
Mohammadi, S.Saeed
Balance function after cochlear implant and inner ear anomaly: Comparison of dynamic posturography
title Balance function after cochlear implant and inner ear anomaly: Comparison of dynamic posturography
title_full Balance function after cochlear implant and inner ear anomaly: Comparison of dynamic posturography
title_fullStr Balance function after cochlear implant and inner ear anomaly: Comparison of dynamic posturography
title_full_unstemmed Balance function after cochlear implant and inner ear anomaly: Comparison of dynamic posturography
title_short Balance function after cochlear implant and inner ear anomaly: Comparison of dynamic posturography
title_sort balance function after cochlear implant and inner ear anomaly: comparison of dynamic posturography
topic Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7314490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32596497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.394
work_keys_str_mv AT hosseinzadehfarideh balancefunctionaftercochlearimplantandinnerearanomalycomparisonofdynamicposturography
AT asgharialimohamad balancefunctionaftercochlearimplantandinnerearanomalycomparisonofdynamicposturography
AT moradilakehmaziar balancefunctionaftercochlearimplantandinnerearanomalycomparisonofdynamicposturography
AT farhadimohammad balancefunctionaftercochlearimplantandinnerearanomalycomparisonofdynamicposturography
AT daneshiahmad balancefunctionaftercochlearimplantandinnerearanomalycomparisonofdynamicposturography
AT mohsenimohammad balancefunctionaftercochlearimplantandinnerearanomalycomparisonofdynamicposturography
AT mohammadissaeed balancefunctionaftercochlearimplantandinnerearanomalycomparisonofdynamicposturography