Cargando…
Balance function after cochlear implant and inner ear anomaly: Comparison of dynamic posturography
INTRODUCTION: Patients with sensorineural hearing loss suffer concomitant vestibular dysfunction that is more prevalent in patients with inner ear anomaly and could be aggravated with cochlear implantation. To assess the vestibular dysfunction in patients with cochlear implantation, we compared thei...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7314490/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32596497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.394 |
_version_ | 1783550070386327552 |
---|---|
author | Hosseinzadeh, Farideh Asghari, Alimohamad Moradi‐Lakeh, Maziar Farhadi, Mohammad Daneshi, Ahmad Mohseni, Mohammad Mohammadi, S.Saeed |
author_facet | Hosseinzadeh, Farideh Asghari, Alimohamad Moradi‐Lakeh, Maziar Farhadi, Mohammad Daneshi, Ahmad Mohseni, Mohammad Mohammadi, S.Saeed |
author_sort | Hosseinzadeh, Farideh |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Patients with sensorineural hearing loss suffer concomitant vestibular dysfunction that is more prevalent in patients with inner ear anomaly and could be aggravated with cochlear implantation. To assess the vestibular dysfunction in patients with cochlear implantation, we compared their results with those of patients with and without inner ear anomaly. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a historical cohort study lasting for 20 years on 50 patients with cochlear implantation. All patients underwent dynamic posturography and Bruininks‐Oseretsky Test. RESULTS: Twenty‐two (44%) of the participants showed some types of inner ear anomaly. The frequency of abnormal Bruininks‐Oseretsky Test was 45.5% and 10.7% (P = .005, odds ratio [OR] = 6.9). Abnormal composite was seen in 77.3% and 21.4%, respectively (P < .001; OR = 12.5). The mean strategy score in the fifth condition of the sensory organization test was 25.0 ± 20.4 in patients with inner ear anomaly, whereas it was 44.1 ± 18.9 in those without it (P = .001). CONCLUSION: Balance capability in cochlear implantation patients with inner ear anomaly compared to those without inner ear anomaly was worse. More vestibular rehabilitation treatment plans are suggested for these patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7314490 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73144902020-06-25 Balance function after cochlear implant and inner ear anomaly: Comparison of dynamic posturography Hosseinzadeh, Farideh Asghari, Alimohamad Moradi‐Lakeh, Maziar Farhadi, Mohammad Daneshi, Ahmad Mohseni, Mohammad Mohammadi, S.Saeed Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience INTRODUCTION: Patients with sensorineural hearing loss suffer concomitant vestibular dysfunction that is more prevalent in patients with inner ear anomaly and could be aggravated with cochlear implantation. To assess the vestibular dysfunction in patients with cochlear implantation, we compared their results with those of patients with and without inner ear anomaly. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a historical cohort study lasting for 20 years on 50 patients with cochlear implantation. All patients underwent dynamic posturography and Bruininks‐Oseretsky Test. RESULTS: Twenty‐two (44%) of the participants showed some types of inner ear anomaly. The frequency of abnormal Bruininks‐Oseretsky Test was 45.5% and 10.7% (P = .005, odds ratio [OR] = 6.9). Abnormal composite was seen in 77.3% and 21.4%, respectively (P < .001; OR = 12.5). The mean strategy score in the fifth condition of the sensory organization test was 25.0 ± 20.4 in patients with inner ear anomaly, whereas it was 44.1 ± 18.9 in those without it (P = .001). CONCLUSION: Balance capability in cochlear implantation patients with inner ear anomaly compared to those without inner ear anomaly was worse. More vestibular rehabilitation treatment plans are suggested for these patients. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7314490/ /pubmed/32596497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.394 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The Triological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience Hosseinzadeh, Farideh Asghari, Alimohamad Moradi‐Lakeh, Maziar Farhadi, Mohammad Daneshi, Ahmad Mohseni, Mohammad Mohammadi, S.Saeed Balance function after cochlear implant and inner ear anomaly: Comparison of dynamic posturography |
title | Balance function after cochlear implant and inner ear anomaly: Comparison of dynamic posturography |
title_full | Balance function after cochlear implant and inner ear anomaly: Comparison of dynamic posturography |
title_fullStr | Balance function after cochlear implant and inner ear anomaly: Comparison of dynamic posturography |
title_full_unstemmed | Balance function after cochlear implant and inner ear anomaly: Comparison of dynamic posturography |
title_short | Balance function after cochlear implant and inner ear anomaly: Comparison of dynamic posturography |
title_sort | balance function after cochlear implant and inner ear anomaly: comparison of dynamic posturography |
topic | Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7314490/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32596497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.394 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hosseinzadehfarideh balancefunctionaftercochlearimplantandinnerearanomalycomparisonofdynamicposturography AT asgharialimohamad balancefunctionaftercochlearimplantandinnerearanomalycomparisonofdynamicposturography AT moradilakehmaziar balancefunctionaftercochlearimplantandinnerearanomalycomparisonofdynamicposturography AT farhadimohammad balancefunctionaftercochlearimplantandinnerearanomalycomparisonofdynamicposturography AT daneshiahmad balancefunctionaftercochlearimplantandinnerearanomalycomparisonofdynamicposturography AT mohsenimohammad balancefunctionaftercochlearimplantandinnerearanomalycomparisonofdynamicposturography AT mohammadissaeed balancefunctionaftercochlearimplantandinnerearanomalycomparisonofdynamicposturography |