Cargando…
Developing and Applying a Formative Evaluation Framework for Health Information Technology Implementations: Qualitative Investigation
BACKGROUND: There is currently a lack of comprehensive, intuitive, and usable formative evaluation frameworks for health information technology (HIT) implementations. We therefore sought to develop and apply such a framework. This study describes the Technology, People, Organizations, and Macroenvir...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7315366/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32519968 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/15068 |
_version_ | 1783550243766272000 |
---|---|
author | Cresswell, Kathrin Williams, Robin Sheikh, Aziz |
author_facet | Cresswell, Kathrin Williams, Robin Sheikh, Aziz |
author_sort | Cresswell, Kathrin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is currently a lack of comprehensive, intuitive, and usable formative evaluation frameworks for health information technology (HIT) implementations. We therefore sought to develop and apply such a framework. This study describes the Technology, People, Organizations, and Macroenvironmental factors (TPOM) framework we developed. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to develop and apply a formative evaluation framework for HIT implementations, highlighting interrelationships between identified dimensions and offering guidance for implementers. METHODS: We drew on an initial prototype framework developed as part of a literature review exploring factors for the effective implementation of HIT. In addition, we used qualitative data from three national formative evaluations of different HIT interventions (electronic health record, electronic prescribing, and clinical decision support functionality). The combined data set comprised 19 case studies of primarily hospital settings, and included 703 semistructured interviews, 663 hours of observations, and 864 documents gathered from a range of care settings across National Health Service (NHS) England and NHS Scotland. Data analysis took place over a period of 10 years and was guided by a framework informed by the existing evidence base. RESULTS: TPOM dimensions are intimately related and each include a number of subthemes that evaluators need to consider. Although technological functionalities are crucial in getting an initiative off the ground, system design needs to be cognizant of the accompanying social and organizational transformations required to ensure that technologies deliver the desired value for a variety of stakeholders. Wider structural changes, characterized by shifting policy landscapes and markets, influence technologies and the ways they are used by organizations and staff. CONCLUSIONS: The TPOM framework supports formative evaluations of HIT implementation and digitally enabled transformation efforts. There is now a need for prospective application of the TPOM framework to determine its value. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7315366 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73153662020-07-01 Developing and Applying a Formative Evaluation Framework for Health Information Technology Implementations: Qualitative Investigation Cresswell, Kathrin Williams, Robin Sheikh, Aziz J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: There is currently a lack of comprehensive, intuitive, and usable formative evaluation frameworks for health information technology (HIT) implementations. We therefore sought to develop and apply such a framework. This study describes the Technology, People, Organizations, and Macroenvironmental factors (TPOM) framework we developed. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to develop and apply a formative evaluation framework for HIT implementations, highlighting interrelationships between identified dimensions and offering guidance for implementers. METHODS: We drew on an initial prototype framework developed as part of a literature review exploring factors for the effective implementation of HIT. In addition, we used qualitative data from three national formative evaluations of different HIT interventions (electronic health record, electronic prescribing, and clinical decision support functionality). The combined data set comprised 19 case studies of primarily hospital settings, and included 703 semistructured interviews, 663 hours of observations, and 864 documents gathered from a range of care settings across National Health Service (NHS) England and NHS Scotland. Data analysis took place over a period of 10 years and was guided by a framework informed by the existing evidence base. RESULTS: TPOM dimensions are intimately related and each include a number of subthemes that evaluators need to consider. Although technological functionalities are crucial in getting an initiative off the ground, system design needs to be cognizant of the accompanying social and organizational transformations required to ensure that technologies deliver the desired value for a variety of stakeholders. Wider structural changes, characterized by shifting policy landscapes and markets, influence technologies and the ways they are used by organizations and staff. CONCLUSIONS: The TPOM framework supports formative evaluations of HIT implementation and digitally enabled transformation efforts. There is now a need for prospective application of the TPOM framework to determine its value. JMIR Publications 2020-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7315366/ /pubmed/32519968 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/15068 Text en ©Kathrin Cresswell, Robin Williams, Aziz Sheikh. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 10.06.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Cresswell, Kathrin Williams, Robin Sheikh, Aziz Developing and Applying a Formative Evaluation Framework for Health Information Technology Implementations: Qualitative Investigation |
title | Developing and Applying a Formative Evaluation Framework for Health Information Technology Implementations: Qualitative Investigation |
title_full | Developing and Applying a Formative Evaluation Framework for Health Information Technology Implementations: Qualitative Investigation |
title_fullStr | Developing and Applying a Formative Evaluation Framework for Health Information Technology Implementations: Qualitative Investigation |
title_full_unstemmed | Developing and Applying a Formative Evaluation Framework for Health Information Technology Implementations: Qualitative Investigation |
title_short | Developing and Applying a Formative Evaluation Framework for Health Information Technology Implementations: Qualitative Investigation |
title_sort | developing and applying a formative evaluation framework for health information technology implementations: qualitative investigation |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7315366/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32519968 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/15068 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cresswellkathrin developingandapplyingaformativeevaluationframeworkforhealthinformationtechnologyimplementationsqualitativeinvestigation AT williamsrobin developingandapplyingaformativeevaluationframeworkforhealthinformationtechnologyimplementationsqualitativeinvestigation AT sheikhaziz developingandapplyingaformativeevaluationframeworkforhealthinformationtechnologyimplementationsqualitativeinvestigation |