Cargando…

Developing and Applying a Formative Evaluation Framework for Health Information Technology Implementations: Qualitative Investigation

BACKGROUND: There is currently a lack of comprehensive, intuitive, and usable formative evaluation frameworks for health information technology (HIT) implementations. We therefore sought to develop and apply such a framework. This study describes the Technology, People, Organizations, and Macroenvir...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cresswell, Kathrin, Williams, Robin, Sheikh, Aziz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7315366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32519968
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/15068
_version_ 1783550243766272000
author Cresswell, Kathrin
Williams, Robin
Sheikh, Aziz
author_facet Cresswell, Kathrin
Williams, Robin
Sheikh, Aziz
author_sort Cresswell, Kathrin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is currently a lack of comprehensive, intuitive, and usable formative evaluation frameworks for health information technology (HIT) implementations. We therefore sought to develop and apply such a framework. This study describes the Technology, People, Organizations, and Macroenvironmental factors (TPOM) framework we developed. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to develop and apply a formative evaluation framework for HIT implementations, highlighting interrelationships between identified dimensions and offering guidance for implementers. METHODS: We drew on an initial prototype framework developed as part of a literature review exploring factors for the effective implementation of HIT. In addition, we used qualitative data from three national formative evaluations of different HIT interventions (electronic health record, electronic prescribing, and clinical decision support functionality). The combined data set comprised 19 case studies of primarily hospital settings, and included 703 semistructured interviews, 663 hours of observations, and 864 documents gathered from a range of care settings across National Health Service (NHS) England and NHS Scotland. Data analysis took place over a period of 10 years and was guided by a framework informed by the existing evidence base. RESULTS: TPOM dimensions are intimately related and each include a number of subthemes that evaluators need to consider. Although technological functionalities are crucial in getting an initiative off the ground, system design needs to be cognizant of the accompanying social and organizational transformations required to ensure that technologies deliver the desired value for a variety of stakeholders. Wider structural changes, characterized by shifting policy landscapes and markets, influence technologies and the ways they are used by organizations and staff. CONCLUSIONS: The TPOM framework supports formative evaluations of HIT implementation and digitally enabled transformation efforts. There is now a need for prospective application of the TPOM framework to determine its value.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7315366
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73153662020-07-01 Developing and Applying a Formative Evaluation Framework for Health Information Technology Implementations: Qualitative Investigation Cresswell, Kathrin Williams, Robin Sheikh, Aziz J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: There is currently a lack of comprehensive, intuitive, and usable formative evaluation frameworks for health information technology (HIT) implementations. We therefore sought to develop and apply such a framework. This study describes the Technology, People, Organizations, and Macroenvironmental factors (TPOM) framework we developed. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to develop and apply a formative evaluation framework for HIT implementations, highlighting interrelationships between identified dimensions and offering guidance for implementers. METHODS: We drew on an initial prototype framework developed as part of a literature review exploring factors for the effective implementation of HIT. In addition, we used qualitative data from three national formative evaluations of different HIT interventions (electronic health record, electronic prescribing, and clinical decision support functionality). The combined data set comprised 19 case studies of primarily hospital settings, and included 703 semistructured interviews, 663 hours of observations, and 864 documents gathered from a range of care settings across National Health Service (NHS) England and NHS Scotland. Data analysis took place over a period of 10 years and was guided by a framework informed by the existing evidence base. RESULTS: TPOM dimensions are intimately related and each include a number of subthemes that evaluators need to consider. Although technological functionalities are crucial in getting an initiative off the ground, system design needs to be cognizant of the accompanying social and organizational transformations required to ensure that technologies deliver the desired value for a variety of stakeholders. Wider structural changes, characterized by shifting policy landscapes and markets, influence technologies and the ways they are used by organizations and staff. CONCLUSIONS: The TPOM framework supports formative evaluations of HIT implementation and digitally enabled transformation efforts. There is now a need for prospective application of the TPOM framework to determine its value. JMIR Publications 2020-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7315366/ /pubmed/32519968 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/15068 Text en ©Kathrin Cresswell, Robin Williams, Aziz Sheikh. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 10.06.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Cresswell, Kathrin
Williams, Robin
Sheikh, Aziz
Developing and Applying a Formative Evaluation Framework for Health Information Technology Implementations: Qualitative Investigation
title Developing and Applying a Formative Evaluation Framework for Health Information Technology Implementations: Qualitative Investigation
title_full Developing and Applying a Formative Evaluation Framework for Health Information Technology Implementations: Qualitative Investigation
title_fullStr Developing and Applying a Formative Evaluation Framework for Health Information Technology Implementations: Qualitative Investigation
title_full_unstemmed Developing and Applying a Formative Evaluation Framework for Health Information Technology Implementations: Qualitative Investigation
title_short Developing and Applying a Formative Evaluation Framework for Health Information Technology Implementations: Qualitative Investigation
title_sort developing and applying a formative evaluation framework for health information technology implementations: qualitative investigation
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7315366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32519968
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/15068
work_keys_str_mv AT cresswellkathrin developingandapplyingaformativeevaluationframeworkforhealthinformationtechnologyimplementationsqualitativeinvestigation
AT williamsrobin developingandapplyingaformativeevaluationframeworkforhealthinformationtechnologyimplementationsqualitativeinvestigation
AT sheikhaziz developingandapplyingaformativeevaluationframeworkforhealthinformationtechnologyimplementationsqualitativeinvestigation