Cargando…

Spelling Errors and Shouting Capitalization Lead to Additive Penalties to Trustworthiness of Online Health Information: Randomized Experiment With Laypersons

BACKGROUND: The written format and literacy competence of screen-based texts can interfere with the perceived trustworthiness of health information in online forums, independent of the semantic content. Unlike in professional content, the format in unmoderated forums can regularly hint at incivility...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Witchel, Harry J, Thompson, Georgina A, Jones, Christopher I, Westling, Carina E I, Romero, Juan, Nicotra, Alessia, Maag, Bruno, Critchley, Hugo D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7315370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32519676
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/15171
_version_ 1783550244799119360
author Witchel, Harry J
Thompson, Georgina A
Jones, Christopher I
Westling, Carina E I
Romero, Juan
Nicotra, Alessia
Maag, Bruno
Critchley, Hugo D
author_facet Witchel, Harry J
Thompson, Georgina A
Jones, Christopher I
Westling, Carina E I
Romero, Juan
Nicotra, Alessia
Maag, Bruno
Critchley, Hugo D
author_sort Witchel, Harry J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The written format and literacy competence of screen-based texts can interfere with the perceived trustworthiness of health information in online forums, independent of the semantic content. Unlike in professional content, the format in unmoderated forums can regularly hint at incivility, perceived as deliberate rudeness or casual disregard toward the reader, for example, through spelling errors and unnecessary emphatic capitalization of whole words (online shouting). OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to quantify the comparative effects of spelling errors and inappropriate capitalization on ratings of trustworthiness independently of lay insight and to determine whether these changes act synergistically or additively on the ratings. METHODS: In web-based experiments, 301 UK-recruited participants rated 36 randomized short stimulus excerpts (in the format of information from an unmoderated health forum about multiple sclerosis) for trustworthiness using a semantic differential slider. A total of 9 control excerpts were compared with matching error-containing excerpts. Each matching error-containing excerpt included 5 instances of misspelling, or 5 instances of inappropriate capitalization (shouting), or a combination of 5 misspelling plus 5 inappropriate capitalization errors. Data were analyzed in a linear mixed effects model. RESULTS: The mean trustworthiness ratings of the control excerpts ranged from 32.59 to 62.31 (rating scale 0-100). Compared with the control excerpts, excerpts containing only misspellings were rated as being 8.86 points less trustworthy, those containing inappropriate capitalization were rated as 6.41 points less trustworthy, and those containing the combination of misspelling and capitalization were rated as 14.33 points less trustworthy (P<.001 for all). Misspelling and inappropriate capitalization show an additive effect. CONCLUSIONS: Distinct indicators of incivility independently and additively penalize the perceived trustworthiness of online text independently of lay insight, eliciting a medium effect size.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7315370
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73153702020-07-01 Spelling Errors and Shouting Capitalization Lead to Additive Penalties to Trustworthiness of Online Health Information: Randomized Experiment With Laypersons Witchel, Harry J Thompson, Georgina A Jones, Christopher I Westling, Carina E I Romero, Juan Nicotra, Alessia Maag, Bruno Critchley, Hugo D J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: The written format and literacy competence of screen-based texts can interfere with the perceived trustworthiness of health information in online forums, independent of the semantic content. Unlike in professional content, the format in unmoderated forums can regularly hint at incivility, perceived as deliberate rudeness or casual disregard toward the reader, for example, through spelling errors and unnecessary emphatic capitalization of whole words (online shouting). OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to quantify the comparative effects of spelling errors and inappropriate capitalization on ratings of trustworthiness independently of lay insight and to determine whether these changes act synergistically or additively on the ratings. METHODS: In web-based experiments, 301 UK-recruited participants rated 36 randomized short stimulus excerpts (in the format of information from an unmoderated health forum about multiple sclerosis) for trustworthiness using a semantic differential slider. A total of 9 control excerpts were compared with matching error-containing excerpts. Each matching error-containing excerpt included 5 instances of misspelling, or 5 instances of inappropriate capitalization (shouting), or a combination of 5 misspelling plus 5 inappropriate capitalization errors. Data were analyzed in a linear mixed effects model. RESULTS: The mean trustworthiness ratings of the control excerpts ranged from 32.59 to 62.31 (rating scale 0-100). Compared with the control excerpts, excerpts containing only misspellings were rated as being 8.86 points less trustworthy, those containing inappropriate capitalization were rated as 6.41 points less trustworthy, and those containing the combination of misspelling and capitalization were rated as 14.33 points less trustworthy (P<.001 for all). Misspelling and inappropriate capitalization show an additive effect. CONCLUSIONS: Distinct indicators of incivility independently and additively penalize the perceived trustworthiness of online text independently of lay insight, eliciting a medium effect size. JMIR Publications 2020-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7315370/ /pubmed/32519676 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/15171 Text en ©Harry J Witchel, Georgina A Thompson, Christopher I Jones, Carina E I Westling, Juan Romero, Alessia Nicotra, Bruno Maag, Hugo D Critchley. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 10.06.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Witchel, Harry J
Thompson, Georgina A
Jones, Christopher I
Westling, Carina E I
Romero, Juan
Nicotra, Alessia
Maag, Bruno
Critchley, Hugo D
Spelling Errors and Shouting Capitalization Lead to Additive Penalties to Trustworthiness of Online Health Information: Randomized Experiment With Laypersons
title Spelling Errors and Shouting Capitalization Lead to Additive Penalties to Trustworthiness of Online Health Information: Randomized Experiment With Laypersons
title_full Spelling Errors and Shouting Capitalization Lead to Additive Penalties to Trustworthiness of Online Health Information: Randomized Experiment With Laypersons
title_fullStr Spelling Errors and Shouting Capitalization Lead to Additive Penalties to Trustworthiness of Online Health Information: Randomized Experiment With Laypersons
title_full_unstemmed Spelling Errors and Shouting Capitalization Lead to Additive Penalties to Trustworthiness of Online Health Information: Randomized Experiment With Laypersons
title_short Spelling Errors and Shouting Capitalization Lead to Additive Penalties to Trustworthiness of Online Health Information: Randomized Experiment With Laypersons
title_sort spelling errors and shouting capitalization lead to additive penalties to trustworthiness of online health information: randomized experiment with laypersons
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7315370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32519676
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/15171
work_keys_str_mv AT witchelharryj spellingerrorsandshoutingcapitalizationleadtoadditivepenaltiestotrustworthinessofonlinehealthinformationrandomizedexperimentwithlaypersons
AT thompsongeorginaa spellingerrorsandshoutingcapitalizationleadtoadditivepenaltiestotrustworthinessofonlinehealthinformationrandomizedexperimentwithlaypersons
AT joneschristopheri spellingerrorsandshoutingcapitalizationleadtoadditivepenaltiestotrustworthinessofonlinehealthinformationrandomizedexperimentwithlaypersons
AT westlingcarinaei spellingerrorsandshoutingcapitalizationleadtoadditivepenaltiestotrustworthinessofonlinehealthinformationrandomizedexperimentwithlaypersons
AT romerojuan spellingerrorsandshoutingcapitalizationleadtoadditivepenaltiestotrustworthinessofonlinehealthinformationrandomizedexperimentwithlaypersons
AT nicotraalessia spellingerrorsandshoutingcapitalizationleadtoadditivepenaltiestotrustworthinessofonlinehealthinformationrandomizedexperimentwithlaypersons
AT maagbruno spellingerrorsandshoutingcapitalizationleadtoadditivepenaltiestotrustworthinessofonlinehealthinformationrandomizedexperimentwithlaypersons
AT critchleyhugod spellingerrorsandshoutingcapitalizationleadtoadditivepenaltiestotrustworthinessofonlinehealthinformationrandomizedexperimentwithlaypersons