Cargando…

Practice parameters for the use of actigraphy in the military operational context: the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research Operational Research Kit-Actigraphy (WORK-A)

BACKGROUND: The Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR) Operational Research Kit-Actigraphy (WORK-A) is a set of unique practice parameters and actigraphy-derived measures for the analysis of operational military sleep patterns. The WORK-A draws on best practices from the literature and compr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Devine, Jaime K., Choynowski, Jake, Burke, Tina, Carlsson, Kajsa, Capaldi, Vincent F., McKeon, Ashlee B., Sowden, Walter J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7315473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32580783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40779-020-00255-7
_version_ 1783550259135250432
author Devine, Jaime K.
Choynowski, Jake
Burke, Tina
Carlsson, Kajsa
Capaldi, Vincent F.
McKeon, Ashlee B.
Sowden, Walter J.
author_facet Devine, Jaime K.
Choynowski, Jake
Burke, Tina
Carlsson, Kajsa
Capaldi, Vincent F.
McKeon, Ashlee B.
Sowden, Walter J.
author_sort Devine, Jaime K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR) Operational Research Kit-Actigraphy (WORK-A) is a set of unique practice parameters and actigraphy-derived measures for the analysis of operational military sleep patterns. The WORK-A draws on best practices from the literature and comprises 15 additional descriptive variables. Here, we demonstrate the WORK-A with a sample of United States Army Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC) cadets (n = 286) during a month-long capstone pre-commissioning training exercise. METHODS: The sleep of ROTC cadets (n = 286) was measured by Philips Actiwatch devices during the 31-day training exercise. The preliminary effectiveness of the WORK-A was tested by comparing differences in sleep measures collected by Actiwatches as calculated by Philips Actiware software against WORK-A-determined sleep measures and self-report sleep collected from a subset of ROTC cadets (n = 140). RESULTS: Actiware sleep summary statistics were significantly different from WORK-A measures and self-report sleep (all P ≤ 0.001). Bedtimes and waketimes as determined by WORK-A major sleep intervals showed the best agreement with self-report bedtime (22:21 ± 1:30 vs. 22:13 ± 0:40, P = 0.21) and waketime (04:30 ± 2:17 vs. 04:31 ± 0:47, P = 0.68). Though still significantly different, the discrepancy was smaller between the WORK-A measure of time in bed (TIB) for major sleep intervals (352 ± 29 min) and self-report nightly sleep duration (337 ± 57 min, P = 0.006) than that between the WORK-A major TIB and Actiware TIB (177 ± 42, P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Default actigraphy methods are not the most accurate methods for characterizing soldier sleep, but reliable methods for characterizing operational sleep patterns is a necessary first step in developing strategies to improve soldier readiness. The WORK-A addresses this knowledge gap by providing practice parameters and a robust variety of measures with which to profile sleep behavior in service members.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7315473
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73154732020-06-25 Practice parameters for the use of actigraphy in the military operational context: the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research Operational Research Kit-Actigraphy (WORK-A) Devine, Jaime K. Choynowski, Jake Burke, Tina Carlsson, Kajsa Capaldi, Vincent F. McKeon, Ashlee B. Sowden, Walter J. Mil Med Res Methodology BACKGROUND: The Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR) Operational Research Kit-Actigraphy (WORK-A) is a set of unique practice parameters and actigraphy-derived measures for the analysis of operational military sleep patterns. The WORK-A draws on best practices from the literature and comprises 15 additional descriptive variables. Here, we demonstrate the WORK-A with a sample of United States Army Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC) cadets (n = 286) during a month-long capstone pre-commissioning training exercise. METHODS: The sleep of ROTC cadets (n = 286) was measured by Philips Actiwatch devices during the 31-day training exercise. The preliminary effectiveness of the WORK-A was tested by comparing differences in sleep measures collected by Actiwatches as calculated by Philips Actiware software against WORK-A-determined sleep measures and self-report sleep collected from a subset of ROTC cadets (n = 140). RESULTS: Actiware sleep summary statistics were significantly different from WORK-A measures and self-report sleep (all P ≤ 0.001). Bedtimes and waketimes as determined by WORK-A major sleep intervals showed the best agreement with self-report bedtime (22:21 ± 1:30 vs. 22:13 ± 0:40, P = 0.21) and waketime (04:30 ± 2:17 vs. 04:31 ± 0:47, P = 0.68). Though still significantly different, the discrepancy was smaller between the WORK-A measure of time in bed (TIB) for major sleep intervals (352 ± 29 min) and self-report nightly sleep duration (337 ± 57 min, P = 0.006) than that between the WORK-A major TIB and Actiware TIB (177 ± 42, P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Default actigraphy methods are not the most accurate methods for characterizing soldier sleep, but reliable methods for characterizing operational sleep patterns is a necessary first step in developing strategies to improve soldier readiness. The WORK-A addresses this knowledge gap by providing practice parameters and a robust variety of measures with which to profile sleep behavior in service members. BioMed Central 2020-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7315473/ /pubmed/32580783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40779-020-00255-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Methodology
Devine, Jaime K.
Choynowski, Jake
Burke, Tina
Carlsson, Kajsa
Capaldi, Vincent F.
McKeon, Ashlee B.
Sowden, Walter J.
Practice parameters for the use of actigraphy in the military operational context: the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research Operational Research Kit-Actigraphy (WORK-A)
title Practice parameters for the use of actigraphy in the military operational context: the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research Operational Research Kit-Actigraphy (WORK-A)
title_full Practice parameters for the use of actigraphy in the military operational context: the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research Operational Research Kit-Actigraphy (WORK-A)
title_fullStr Practice parameters for the use of actigraphy in the military operational context: the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research Operational Research Kit-Actigraphy (WORK-A)
title_full_unstemmed Practice parameters for the use of actigraphy in the military operational context: the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research Operational Research Kit-Actigraphy (WORK-A)
title_short Practice parameters for the use of actigraphy in the military operational context: the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research Operational Research Kit-Actigraphy (WORK-A)
title_sort practice parameters for the use of actigraphy in the military operational context: the walter reed army institute of research operational research kit-actigraphy (work-a)
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7315473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32580783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40779-020-00255-7
work_keys_str_mv AT devinejaimek practiceparametersfortheuseofactigraphyinthemilitaryoperationalcontextthewalterreedarmyinstituteofresearchoperationalresearchkitactigraphyworka
AT choynowskijake practiceparametersfortheuseofactigraphyinthemilitaryoperationalcontextthewalterreedarmyinstituteofresearchoperationalresearchkitactigraphyworka
AT burketina practiceparametersfortheuseofactigraphyinthemilitaryoperationalcontextthewalterreedarmyinstituteofresearchoperationalresearchkitactigraphyworka
AT carlssonkajsa practiceparametersfortheuseofactigraphyinthemilitaryoperationalcontextthewalterreedarmyinstituteofresearchoperationalresearchkitactigraphyworka
AT capaldivincentf practiceparametersfortheuseofactigraphyinthemilitaryoperationalcontextthewalterreedarmyinstituteofresearchoperationalresearchkitactigraphyworka
AT mckeonashleeb practiceparametersfortheuseofactigraphyinthemilitaryoperationalcontextthewalterreedarmyinstituteofresearchoperationalresearchkitactigraphyworka
AT sowdenwalterj practiceparametersfortheuseofactigraphyinthemilitaryoperationalcontextthewalterreedarmyinstituteofresearchoperationalresearchkitactigraphyworka