Cargando…
Practice parameters for the use of actigraphy in the military operational context: the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research Operational Research Kit-Actigraphy (WORK-A)
BACKGROUND: The Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR) Operational Research Kit-Actigraphy (WORK-A) is a set of unique practice parameters and actigraphy-derived measures for the analysis of operational military sleep patterns. The WORK-A draws on best practices from the literature and compr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7315473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32580783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40779-020-00255-7 |
_version_ | 1783550259135250432 |
---|---|
author | Devine, Jaime K. Choynowski, Jake Burke, Tina Carlsson, Kajsa Capaldi, Vincent F. McKeon, Ashlee B. Sowden, Walter J. |
author_facet | Devine, Jaime K. Choynowski, Jake Burke, Tina Carlsson, Kajsa Capaldi, Vincent F. McKeon, Ashlee B. Sowden, Walter J. |
author_sort | Devine, Jaime K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR) Operational Research Kit-Actigraphy (WORK-A) is a set of unique practice parameters and actigraphy-derived measures for the analysis of operational military sleep patterns. The WORK-A draws on best practices from the literature and comprises 15 additional descriptive variables. Here, we demonstrate the WORK-A with a sample of United States Army Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC) cadets (n = 286) during a month-long capstone pre-commissioning training exercise. METHODS: The sleep of ROTC cadets (n = 286) was measured by Philips Actiwatch devices during the 31-day training exercise. The preliminary effectiveness of the WORK-A was tested by comparing differences in sleep measures collected by Actiwatches as calculated by Philips Actiware software against WORK-A-determined sleep measures and self-report sleep collected from a subset of ROTC cadets (n = 140). RESULTS: Actiware sleep summary statistics were significantly different from WORK-A measures and self-report sleep (all P ≤ 0.001). Bedtimes and waketimes as determined by WORK-A major sleep intervals showed the best agreement with self-report bedtime (22:21 ± 1:30 vs. 22:13 ± 0:40, P = 0.21) and waketime (04:30 ± 2:17 vs. 04:31 ± 0:47, P = 0.68). Though still significantly different, the discrepancy was smaller between the WORK-A measure of time in bed (TIB) for major sleep intervals (352 ± 29 min) and self-report nightly sleep duration (337 ± 57 min, P = 0.006) than that between the WORK-A major TIB and Actiware TIB (177 ± 42, P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Default actigraphy methods are not the most accurate methods for characterizing soldier sleep, but reliable methods for characterizing operational sleep patterns is a necessary first step in developing strategies to improve soldier readiness. The WORK-A addresses this knowledge gap by providing practice parameters and a robust variety of measures with which to profile sleep behavior in service members. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7315473 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73154732020-06-25 Practice parameters for the use of actigraphy in the military operational context: the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research Operational Research Kit-Actigraphy (WORK-A) Devine, Jaime K. Choynowski, Jake Burke, Tina Carlsson, Kajsa Capaldi, Vincent F. McKeon, Ashlee B. Sowden, Walter J. Mil Med Res Methodology BACKGROUND: The Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR) Operational Research Kit-Actigraphy (WORK-A) is a set of unique practice parameters and actigraphy-derived measures for the analysis of operational military sleep patterns. The WORK-A draws on best practices from the literature and comprises 15 additional descriptive variables. Here, we demonstrate the WORK-A with a sample of United States Army Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC) cadets (n = 286) during a month-long capstone pre-commissioning training exercise. METHODS: The sleep of ROTC cadets (n = 286) was measured by Philips Actiwatch devices during the 31-day training exercise. The preliminary effectiveness of the WORK-A was tested by comparing differences in sleep measures collected by Actiwatches as calculated by Philips Actiware software against WORK-A-determined sleep measures and self-report sleep collected from a subset of ROTC cadets (n = 140). RESULTS: Actiware sleep summary statistics were significantly different from WORK-A measures and self-report sleep (all P ≤ 0.001). Bedtimes and waketimes as determined by WORK-A major sleep intervals showed the best agreement with self-report bedtime (22:21 ± 1:30 vs. 22:13 ± 0:40, P = 0.21) and waketime (04:30 ± 2:17 vs. 04:31 ± 0:47, P = 0.68). Though still significantly different, the discrepancy was smaller between the WORK-A measure of time in bed (TIB) for major sleep intervals (352 ± 29 min) and self-report nightly sleep duration (337 ± 57 min, P = 0.006) than that between the WORK-A major TIB and Actiware TIB (177 ± 42, P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Default actigraphy methods are not the most accurate methods for characterizing soldier sleep, but reliable methods for characterizing operational sleep patterns is a necessary first step in developing strategies to improve soldier readiness. The WORK-A addresses this knowledge gap by providing practice parameters and a robust variety of measures with which to profile sleep behavior in service members. BioMed Central 2020-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7315473/ /pubmed/32580783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40779-020-00255-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Devine, Jaime K. Choynowski, Jake Burke, Tina Carlsson, Kajsa Capaldi, Vincent F. McKeon, Ashlee B. Sowden, Walter J. Practice parameters for the use of actigraphy in the military operational context: the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research Operational Research Kit-Actigraphy (WORK-A) |
title | Practice parameters for the use of actigraphy in the military operational context: the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research Operational Research Kit-Actigraphy (WORK-A) |
title_full | Practice parameters for the use of actigraphy in the military operational context: the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research Operational Research Kit-Actigraphy (WORK-A) |
title_fullStr | Practice parameters for the use of actigraphy in the military operational context: the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research Operational Research Kit-Actigraphy (WORK-A) |
title_full_unstemmed | Practice parameters for the use of actigraphy in the military operational context: the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research Operational Research Kit-Actigraphy (WORK-A) |
title_short | Practice parameters for the use of actigraphy in the military operational context: the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research Operational Research Kit-Actigraphy (WORK-A) |
title_sort | practice parameters for the use of actigraphy in the military operational context: the walter reed army institute of research operational research kit-actigraphy (work-a) |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7315473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32580783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40779-020-00255-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT devinejaimek practiceparametersfortheuseofactigraphyinthemilitaryoperationalcontextthewalterreedarmyinstituteofresearchoperationalresearchkitactigraphyworka AT choynowskijake practiceparametersfortheuseofactigraphyinthemilitaryoperationalcontextthewalterreedarmyinstituteofresearchoperationalresearchkitactigraphyworka AT burketina practiceparametersfortheuseofactigraphyinthemilitaryoperationalcontextthewalterreedarmyinstituteofresearchoperationalresearchkitactigraphyworka AT carlssonkajsa practiceparametersfortheuseofactigraphyinthemilitaryoperationalcontextthewalterreedarmyinstituteofresearchoperationalresearchkitactigraphyworka AT capaldivincentf practiceparametersfortheuseofactigraphyinthemilitaryoperationalcontextthewalterreedarmyinstituteofresearchoperationalresearchkitactigraphyworka AT mckeonashleeb practiceparametersfortheuseofactigraphyinthemilitaryoperationalcontextthewalterreedarmyinstituteofresearchoperationalresearchkitactigraphyworka AT sowdenwalterj practiceparametersfortheuseofactigraphyinthemilitaryoperationalcontextthewalterreedarmyinstituteofresearchoperationalresearchkitactigraphyworka |