Cargando…
Brief evidence-based interventions for universal child health services: a restricted evidence assessment of the literature
BACKGROUND: Universal child health services (UCHS) provide an important pragmatic platform for the delivery of universal and targeted interventions to support families and optimize child health outcomes. We aimed to identify brief, evidence-based interventions for common health and developmental pro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7315474/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32580720 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09104-7 |
_version_ | 1783550259482329088 |
---|---|
author | Newham, James J. McLean, Karen Ginja, Samuel Hurt, Lisa Molloy, Carly Lingam, Raghu Goldfeld, Sharon |
author_facet | Newham, James J. McLean, Karen Ginja, Samuel Hurt, Lisa Molloy, Carly Lingam, Raghu Goldfeld, Sharon |
author_sort | Newham, James J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Universal child health services (UCHS) provide an important pragmatic platform for the delivery of universal and targeted interventions to support families and optimize child health outcomes. We aimed to identify brief, evidence-based interventions for common health and developmental problems that could be potentially implemented in UCHS. METHODS: A restricted evidence assessment (REA) of electronic databases and grey literature was undertaken covering January 2006 to August 2019. Studies were eligible if (i) outcomes related to one or more of four areas: child social and emotional wellbeing (SEWB), infant sleep, home learning environment or parent mental health, (ii) a comparison group was used, (iii) universal or targeted intervention were delivered in non-tertiary settings, (iv) interventions did not last more than 4 sessions, and (v) children were aged between 2 weeks postpartum and 5 years at baseline. RESULTS: Seventeen studies met the eligibility criteria. Of these, three interventions could possibly be implemented at scale within UCHS platforms: (1) a universal child behavioural intervention which did not affect its primary outcome of infant sleep but improved parental mental health, (2) a universal screening programme which improved maternal mental health, and (3) a targeted child behavioural intervention which improved parent-reported infant sleep problems and parental mental health. Key lessons learnt include: (1) Interventions should impart the maximal amount of information within an initial session with future sessions reinforcing key messages, (2) Interventions should see the family as a holistic unit by considering the needs of parents with an emphasis on identification, triage and referral, and (3) Brief interventions may be more acceptable for stigmatized topics, but still entail considerable barriers that deter the most vulnerable. CONCLUSIONS: Delivery and evaluation of brief evidence-based interventions from a UCHS could lead to improved maternal and child health outcomes through a more responsive and equitable service. We recommend three interventions that meet our criteria of “best bet” interventions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7315474 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73154742020-06-25 Brief evidence-based interventions for universal child health services: a restricted evidence assessment of the literature Newham, James J. McLean, Karen Ginja, Samuel Hurt, Lisa Molloy, Carly Lingam, Raghu Goldfeld, Sharon BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Universal child health services (UCHS) provide an important pragmatic platform for the delivery of universal and targeted interventions to support families and optimize child health outcomes. We aimed to identify brief, evidence-based interventions for common health and developmental problems that could be potentially implemented in UCHS. METHODS: A restricted evidence assessment (REA) of electronic databases and grey literature was undertaken covering January 2006 to August 2019. Studies were eligible if (i) outcomes related to one or more of four areas: child social and emotional wellbeing (SEWB), infant sleep, home learning environment or parent mental health, (ii) a comparison group was used, (iii) universal or targeted intervention were delivered in non-tertiary settings, (iv) interventions did not last more than 4 sessions, and (v) children were aged between 2 weeks postpartum and 5 years at baseline. RESULTS: Seventeen studies met the eligibility criteria. Of these, three interventions could possibly be implemented at scale within UCHS platforms: (1) a universal child behavioural intervention which did not affect its primary outcome of infant sleep but improved parental mental health, (2) a universal screening programme which improved maternal mental health, and (3) a targeted child behavioural intervention which improved parent-reported infant sleep problems and parental mental health. Key lessons learnt include: (1) Interventions should impart the maximal amount of information within an initial session with future sessions reinforcing key messages, (2) Interventions should see the family as a holistic unit by considering the needs of parents with an emphasis on identification, triage and referral, and (3) Brief interventions may be more acceptable for stigmatized topics, but still entail considerable barriers that deter the most vulnerable. CONCLUSIONS: Delivery and evaluation of brief evidence-based interventions from a UCHS could lead to improved maternal and child health outcomes through a more responsive and equitable service. We recommend three interventions that meet our criteria of “best bet” interventions. BioMed Central 2020-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7315474/ /pubmed/32580720 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09104-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Newham, James J. McLean, Karen Ginja, Samuel Hurt, Lisa Molloy, Carly Lingam, Raghu Goldfeld, Sharon Brief evidence-based interventions for universal child health services: a restricted evidence assessment of the literature |
title | Brief evidence-based interventions for universal child health services: a restricted evidence assessment of the literature |
title_full | Brief evidence-based interventions for universal child health services: a restricted evidence assessment of the literature |
title_fullStr | Brief evidence-based interventions for universal child health services: a restricted evidence assessment of the literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Brief evidence-based interventions for universal child health services: a restricted evidence assessment of the literature |
title_short | Brief evidence-based interventions for universal child health services: a restricted evidence assessment of the literature |
title_sort | brief evidence-based interventions for universal child health services: a restricted evidence assessment of the literature |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7315474/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32580720 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09104-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT newhamjamesj briefevidencebasedinterventionsforuniversalchildhealthservicesarestrictedevidenceassessmentoftheliterature AT mcleankaren briefevidencebasedinterventionsforuniversalchildhealthservicesarestrictedevidenceassessmentoftheliterature AT ginjasamuel briefevidencebasedinterventionsforuniversalchildhealthservicesarestrictedevidenceassessmentoftheliterature AT hurtlisa briefevidencebasedinterventionsforuniversalchildhealthservicesarestrictedevidenceassessmentoftheliterature AT molloycarly briefevidencebasedinterventionsforuniversalchildhealthservicesarestrictedevidenceassessmentoftheliterature AT lingamraghu briefevidencebasedinterventionsforuniversalchildhealthservicesarestrictedevidenceassessmentoftheliterature AT goldfeldsharon briefevidencebasedinterventionsforuniversalchildhealthservicesarestrictedevidenceassessmentoftheliterature |