Cargando…

Addressing challenges for clinical research responses to emerging epidemics and pandemics: a scoping review

BACKGROUND: Major infectious disease outbreaks are a constant threat to human health. Clinical research responses to outbreaks generate evidence to improve outcomes and outbreak control. Experiences from previous epidemics have identified multiple challenges to undertaking timely clinical research r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sigfrid, Louise, Maskell, Katherine, Bannister, Peter G., Ismail, Sharif A., Collinson, Shelui, Regmi, Sadie, Blackmore, Claire, Harriss, Eli, Longuere, Kajsa-Stina, Gobat, Nina, Horby, Peter, Clarke, Mike, Carson, Gail
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7315698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32586391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01624-8
_version_ 1783550309584338944
author Sigfrid, Louise
Maskell, Katherine
Bannister, Peter G.
Ismail, Sharif A.
Collinson, Shelui
Regmi, Sadie
Blackmore, Claire
Harriss, Eli
Longuere, Kajsa-Stina
Gobat, Nina
Horby, Peter
Clarke, Mike
Carson, Gail
author_facet Sigfrid, Louise
Maskell, Katherine
Bannister, Peter G.
Ismail, Sharif A.
Collinson, Shelui
Regmi, Sadie
Blackmore, Claire
Harriss, Eli
Longuere, Kajsa-Stina
Gobat, Nina
Horby, Peter
Clarke, Mike
Carson, Gail
author_sort Sigfrid, Louise
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Major infectious disease outbreaks are a constant threat to human health. Clinical research responses to outbreaks generate evidence to improve outcomes and outbreak control. Experiences from previous epidemics have identified multiple challenges to undertaking timely clinical research responses. This scoping review is a systematic appraisal of political, economic, administrative, regulatory, logistical, ethical and social (PEARLES) challenges to clinical research responses to emergency epidemics and solutions identified to address these. METHODS: A scoping review. We searched six databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Global Health, PsycINFO, Scopus and Epistemonikos) for articles published from 2008 to July 2018. We included publications reporting PEARLES challenges to clinical research responses to emerging epidemics and pandemics and solutions identified to address these. Two reviewers screened articles for inclusion, extracted and analysed the data. RESULTS: Of 2678 articles screened, 76 were included. Most presented data relating to the 2014–2016 Ebola virus outbreak or the H1N1 outbreak in 2009. The articles related to clinical research responses in Africa (n = 37), Europe (n = 8), North America (n = 5), Latin America and the Caribbean (n = 3) and Asia (n = 1) and/or globally (n = 22). A wide range of solutions to PEARLES challenges was presented, including a need to strengthen global collaborations and coordination at all levels and develop pre-approved protocols and equitable frameworks, protocols and standards for emergencies. Clinical trial networks and expedited funding and approvals were some solutions implemented. National ownership and community engagement from the outset were a key enabler for delivery. Despite the wide range of recommended solutions, none had been formally evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: To strengthen global preparedness and response to the COVID-19 pandemic and future epidemics, identified solutions for rapid clinical research deployment, delivery, and dissemination must be implemented. Improvements are urgently needed to strengthen collaborations, funding mechanisms, global and national research capacity and capability, targeting regions vulnerable to epidemics and pandemics. Solutions need to be flexible to allow timely adaptations to context, and research led by governments of affected regions. Research communities globally need to evaluate their activities and incorporate lessons learnt to refine and rehearse collaborative outbreak response plans in between epidemics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7315698
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73156982020-06-25 Addressing challenges for clinical research responses to emerging epidemics and pandemics: a scoping review Sigfrid, Louise Maskell, Katherine Bannister, Peter G. Ismail, Sharif A. Collinson, Shelui Regmi, Sadie Blackmore, Claire Harriss, Eli Longuere, Kajsa-Stina Gobat, Nina Horby, Peter Clarke, Mike Carson, Gail BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Major infectious disease outbreaks are a constant threat to human health. Clinical research responses to outbreaks generate evidence to improve outcomes and outbreak control. Experiences from previous epidemics have identified multiple challenges to undertaking timely clinical research responses. This scoping review is a systematic appraisal of political, economic, administrative, regulatory, logistical, ethical and social (PEARLES) challenges to clinical research responses to emergency epidemics and solutions identified to address these. METHODS: A scoping review. We searched six databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Global Health, PsycINFO, Scopus and Epistemonikos) for articles published from 2008 to July 2018. We included publications reporting PEARLES challenges to clinical research responses to emerging epidemics and pandemics and solutions identified to address these. Two reviewers screened articles for inclusion, extracted and analysed the data. RESULTS: Of 2678 articles screened, 76 were included. Most presented data relating to the 2014–2016 Ebola virus outbreak or the H1N1 outbreak in 2009. The articles related to clinical research responses in Africa (n = 37), Europe (n = 8), North America (n = 5), Latin America and the Caribbean (n = 3) and Asia (n = 1) and/or globally (n = 22). A wide range of solutions to PEARLES challenges was presented, including a need to strengthen global collaborations and coordination at all levels and develop pre-approved protocols and equitable frameworks, protocols and standards for emergencies. Clinical trial networks and expedited funding and approvals were some solutions implemented. National ownership and community engagement from the outset were a key enabler for delivery. Despite the wide range of recommended solutions, none had been formally evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: To strengthen global preparedness and response to the COVID-19 pandemic and future epidemics, identified solutions for rapid clinical research deployment, delivery, and dissemination must be implemented. Improvements are urgently needed to strengthen collaborations, funding mechanisms, global and national research capacity and capability, targeting regions vulnerable to epidemics and pandemics. Solutions need to be flexible to allow timely adaptations to context, and research led by governments of affected regions. Research communities globally need to evaluate their activities and incorporate lessons learnt to refine and rehearse collaborative outbreak response plans in between epidemics. BioMed Central 2020-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7315698/ /pubmed/32586391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01624-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sigfrid, Louise
Maskell, Katherine
Bannister, Peter G.
Ismail, Sharif A.
Collinson, Shelui
Regmi, Sadie
Blackmore, Claire
Harriss, Eli
Longuere, Kajsa-Stina
Gobat, Nina
Horby, Peter
Clarke, Mike
Carson, Gail
Addressing challenges for clinical research responses to emerging epidemics and pandemics: a scoping review
title Addressing challenges for clinical research responses to emerging epidemics and pandemics: a scoping review
title_full Addressing challenges for clinical research responses to emerging epidemics and pandemics: a scoping review
title_fullStr Addressing challenges for clinical research responses to emerging epidemics and pandemics: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Addressing challenges for clinical research responses to emerging epidemics and pandemics: a scoping review
title_short Addressing challenges for clinical research responses to emerging epidemics and pandemics: a scoping review
title_sort addressing challenges for clinical research responses to emerging epidemics and pandemics: a scoping review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7315698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32586391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01624-8
work_keys_str_mv AT sigfridlouise addressingchallengesforclinicalresearchresponsestoemergingepidemicsandpandemicsascopingreview
AT maskellkatherine addressingchallengesforclinicalresearchresponsestoemergingepidemicsandpandemicsascopingreview
AT bannisterpeterg addressingchallengesforclinicalresearchresponsestoemergingepidemicsandpandemicsascopingreview
AT ismailsharifa addressingchallengesforclinicalresearchresponsestoemergingepidemicsandpandemicsascopingreview
AT collinsonshelui addressingchallengesforclinicalresearchresponsestoemergingepidemicsandpandemicsascopingreview
AT regmisadie addressingchallengesforclinicalresearchresponsestoemergingepidemicsandpandemicsascopingreview
AT blackmoreclaire addressingchallengesforclinicalresearchresponsestoemergingepidemicsandpandemicsascopingreview
AT harrisseli addressingchallengesforclinicalresearchresponsestoemergingepidemicsandpandemicsascopingreview
AT longuerekajsastina addressingchallengesforclinicalresearchresponsestoemergingepidemicsandpandemicsascopingreview
AT gobatnina addressingchallengesforclinicalresearchresponsestoemergingepidemicsandpandemicsascopingreview
AT horbypeter addressingchallengesforclinicalresearchresponsestoemergingepidemicsandpandemicsascopingreview
AT clarkemike addressingchallengesforclinicalresearchresponsestoemergingepidemicsandpandemicsascopingreview
AT carsongail addressingchallengesforclinicalresearchresponsestoemergingepidemicsandpandemicsascopingreview