Cargando…
Comparison between cap-assisted and ligation-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors
BACKGROUND: Modified endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is considered a treatment option for rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) <10 mm in diameter. In this study, we evaluated the clinical outcomes of cap-assisted EMR (EMR-C) and EMR with a ligating device (EMR-L). METHODS: We retrospectively an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7315720/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32624659 http://dx.doi.org/10.20524/aog.2020.0485 |
_version_ | 1783550314875453440 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Jin Park, Yong Eun Choi, Joon Hyuk Heo, Nae-Yun Park, Jongha Park, Seung Ha Moon, Young Soo Nam, Kyung Han Kim, Tae Oh |
author_facet | Lee, Jin Park, Yong Eun Choi, Joon Hyuk Heo, Nae-Yun Park, Jongha Park, Seung Ha Moon, Young Soo Nam, Kyung Han Kim, Tae Oh |
author_sort | Lee, Jin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Modified endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is considered a treatment option for rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) <10 mm in diameter. In this study, we evaluated the clinical outcomes of cap-assisted EMR (EMR-C) and EMR with a ligating device (EMR-L). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 158 patients with 162 rectal NETs treated endoscopically at a single Korean tertiary hospital between March 2010 and November 2017. We evaluated the rates of endoscopic en bloc resection, histologic complete resection, and procedural complications according to the treatment method. RESULTS: Among 162 rectal NETs, 42 were treated with EMR-C and 120 with EMR-L. The endoscopic en bloc resection rate was higher in the EMR-L group than in the EMR-C group (100% vs. 92.9%, P=0.003). A trend was observed towards a superior histologic complete resection rate in the EMR-L group, but it was not statistically significant (92.5% vs. 83.3%, P=0.087). There were no significant differences in procedural complications (P=0.870). In a multivariate analysis, a tumor located ≥10 cm from the anal verge was related to histologic incomplete resection (P=0.039). CONCLUSION: EMR-L may be the preferable treatment method, considering both endoscopic en bloc resection rate and histologic complete resection rate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7315720 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73157202020-07-02 Comparison between cap-assisted and ligation-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors Lee, Jin Park, Yong Eun Choi, Joon Hyuk Heo, Nae-Yun Park, Jongha Park, Seung Ha Moon, Young Soo Nam, Kyung Han Kim, Tae Oh Ann Gastroenterol Original Article BACKGROUND: Modified endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is considered a treatment option for rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) <10 mm in diameter. In this study, we evaluated the clinical outcomes of cap-assisted EMR (EMR-C) and EMR with a ligating device (EMR-L). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 158 patients with 162 rectal NETs treated endoscopically at a single Korean tertiary hospital between March 2010 and November 2017. We evaluated the rates of endoscopic en bloc resection, histologic complete resection, and procedural complications according to the treatment method. RESULTS: Among 162 rectal NETs, 42 were treated with EMR-C and 120 with EMR-L. The endoscopic en bloc resection rate was higher in the EMR-L group than in the EMR-C group (100% vs. 92.9%, P=0.003). A trend was observed towards a superior histologic complete resection rate in the EMR-L group, but it was not statistically significant (92.5% vs. 83.3%, P=0.087). There were no significant differences in procedural complications (P=0.870). In a multivariate analysis, a tumor located ≥10 cm from the anal verge was related to histologic incomplete resection (P=0.039). CONCLUSION: EMR-L may be the preferable treatment method, considering both endoscopic en bloc resection rate and histologic complete resection rate. Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology 2020 2020-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7315720/ /pubmed/32624659 http://dx.doi.org/10.20524/aog.2020.0485 Text en Copyright: © Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lee, Jin Park, Yong Eun Choi, Joon Hyuk Heo, Nae-Yun Park, Jongha Park, Seung Ha Moon, Young Soo Nam, Kyung Han Kim, Tae Oh Comparison between cap-assisted and ligation-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors |
title | Comparison between cap-assisted and ligation-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors |
title_full | Comparison between cap-assisted and ligation-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors |
title_fullStr | Comparison between cap-assisted and ligation-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between cap-assisted and ligation-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors |
title_short | Comparison between cap-assisted and ligation-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors |
title_sort | comparison between cap-assisted and ligation-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7315720/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32624659 http://dx.doi.org/10.20524/aog.2020.0485 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leejin comparisonbetweencapassistedandligationassistedendoscopicmucosalresectionforrectalneuroendocrinetumors AT parkyongeun comparisonbetweencapassistedandligationassistedendoscopicmucosalresectionforrectalneuroendocrinetumors AT choijoonhyuk comparisonbetweencapassistedandligationassistedendoscopicmucosalresectionforrectalneuroendocrinetumors AT heonaeyun comparisonbetweencapassistedandligationassistedendoscopicmucosalresectionforrectalneuroendocrinetumors AT parkjongha comparisonbetweencapassistedandligationassistedendoscopicmucosalresectionforrectalneuroendocrinetumors AT parkseungha comparisonbetweencapassistedandligationassistedendoscopicmucosalresectionforrectalneuroendocrinetumors AT moonyoungsoo comparisonbetweencapassistedandligationassistedendoscopicmucosalresectionforrectalneuroendocrinetumors AT namkyunghan comparisonbetweencapassistedandligationassistedendoscopicmucosalresectionforrectalneuroendocrinetumors AT kimtaeoh comparisonbetweencapassistedandligationassistedendoscopicmucosalresectionforrectalneuroendocrinetumors |