Cargando…
Sex differences in cognitive functioning of patients at-risk for psychosis and healthy controls: Results from the European Gene–Environment Interactions study
BACKGROUND. Sex differences in cognitive functioning have long been recognized in schizophrenia patients and healthy controls (HC). However, few studies have focused on patients with an at-risk mental state (ARMS) for psychosis. Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate sex differences i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7315874/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32167444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2019.10 |
_version_ | 1783550334199660544 |
---|---|
author | Menghini-Müller, Stephanie Studerus, Erich Ittig, Sarah Valmaggia, Lucia R. Kempton, Matthew J. van der Gaag, Mark de Haan, Lieuwe Nelson, Barnaby Bressan, Rodrigo A. Barrantes-Vidal, Neus Jantac, Célia Nordentoft, Merete Ruhrmann, Stephan Sachs, Garbiele Rutten, Bart P. van Os, Jim Riecher-Rössler, Anita |
author_facet | Menghini-Müller, Stephanie Studerus, Erich Ittig, Sarah Valmaggia, Lucia R. Kempton, Matthew J. van der Gaag, Mark de Haan, Lieuwe Nelson, Barnaby Bressan, Rodrigo A. Barrantes-Vidal, Neus Jantac, Célia Nordentoft, Merete Ruhrmann, Stephan Sachs, Garbiele Rutten, Bart P. van Os, Jim Riecher-Rössler, Anita |
author_sort | Menghini-Müller, Stephanie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND. Sex differences in cognitive functioning have long been recognized in schizophrenia patients and healthy controls (HC). However, few studies have focused on patients with an at-risk mental state (ARMS) for psychosis. Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate sex differences in neurocognitive performance in ARMS patients compared with HC. METHODS. The data analyzed in this study were collected within the multicenter European Gene–Environment Interactions study (11 centers). A total of 343 ARMS patients (158 women) and 67 HC subjects (33 women) were included. All participants completed a comprehensive neurocognitive battery. Linear mixed effects models were used to explore whether sex differences in cognitive functioning were present in the total group (main effect of sex) and whether sex differences were different for HC and ARMS (interaction between sex and group). RESULTS. Women performed better in social cognition, speed of processing, and verbal learning than men regardless of whether they were ARMS or HC. However, only differences in speed of processing and verbal learning remained significant after correction for multiple testing. Additionally, ARMS patients displayed alterations in attention, current IQ, speed of processing, verbal learning, and working memory compared with HC. CONCLUSIONS. Findings indicate that sex differences in cognitive functioning in ARMS are similar to those seen between healthy men and women. Thus, it appears that sex differences in cognitive performance may not be specific for ARMS, a finding resembling that in patients with schizophrenic psychoses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7315874 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73158742020-07-07 Sex differences in cognitive functioning of patients at-risk for psychosis and healthy controls: Results from the European Gene–Environment Interactions study Menghini-Müller, Stephanie Studerus, Erich Ittig, Sarah Valmaggia, Lucia R. Kempton, Matthew J. van der Gaag, Mark de Haan, Lieuwe Nelson, Barnaby Bressan, Rodrigo A. Barrantes-Vidal, Neus Jantac, Célia Nordentoft, Merete Ruhrmann, Stephan Sachs, Garbiele Rutten, Bart P. van Os, Jim Riecher-Rössler, Anita Eur Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND. Sex differences in cognitive functioning have long been recognized in schizophrenia patients and healthy controls (HC). However, few studies have focused on patients with an at-risk mental state (ARMS) for psychosis. Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate sex differences in neurocognitive performance in ARMS patients compared with HC. METHODS. The data analyzed in this study were collected within the multicenter European Gene–Environment Interactions study (11 centers). A total of 343 ARMS patients (158 women) and 67 HC subjects (33 women) were included. All participants completed a comprehensive neurocognitive battery. Linear mixed effects models were used to explore whether sex differences in cognitive functioning were present in the total group (main effect of sex) and whether sex differences were different for HC and ARMS (interaction between sex and group). RESULTS. Women performed better in social cognition, speed of processing, and verbal learning than men regardless of whether they were ARMS or HC. However, only differences in speed of processing and verbal learning remained significant after correction for multiple testing. Additionally, ARMS patients displayed alterations in attention, current IQ, speed of processing, verbal learning, and working memory compared with HC. CONCLUSIONS. Findings indicate that sex differences in cognitive functioning in ARMS are similar to those seen between healthy men and women. Thus, it appears that sex differences in cognitive performance may not be specific for ARMS, a finding resembling that in patients with schizophrenic psychoses. Cambridge University Press 2020-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7315874/ /pubmed/32167444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2019.10 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Menghini-Müller, Stephanie Studerus, Erich Ittig, Sarah Valmaggia, Lucia R. Kempton, Matthew J. van der Gaag, Mark de Haan, Lieuwe Nelson, Barnaby Bressan, Rodrigo A. Barrantes-Vidal, Neus Jantac, Célia Nordentoft, Merete Ruhrmann, Stephan Sachs, Garbiele Rutten, Bart P. van Os, Jim Riecher-Rössler, Anita Sex differences in cognitive functioning of patients at-risk for psychosis and healthy controls: Results from the European Gene–Environment Interactions study |
title | Sex differences in cognitive functioning of patients at-risk for psychosis and healthy controls: Results from the European Gene–Environment Interactions study |
title_full | Sex differences in cognitive functioning of patients at-risk for psychosis and healthy controls: Results from the European Gene–Environment Interactions study |
title_fullStr | Sex differences in cognitive functioning of patients at-risk for psychosis and healthy controls: Results from the European Gene–Environment Interactions study |
title_full_unstemmed | Sex differences in cognitive functioning of patients at-risk for psychosis and healthy controls: Results from the European Gene–Environment Interactions study |
title_short | Sex differences in cognitive functioning of patients at-risk for psychosis and healthy controls: Results from the European Gene–Environment Interactions study |
title_sort | sex differences in cognitive functioning of patients at-risk for psychosis and healthy controls: results from the european gene–environment interactions study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7315874/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32167444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2019.10 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT menghinimullerstephanie sexdifferencesincognitivefunctioningofpatientsatriskforpsychosisandhealthycontrolsresultsfromtheeuropeangeneenvironmentinteractionsstudy AT studeruserich sexdifferencesincognitivefunctioningofpatientsatriskforpsychosisandhealthycontrolsresultsfromtheeuropeangeneenvironmentinteractionsstudy AT ittigsarah sexdifferencesincognitivefunctioningofpatientsatriskforpsychosisandhealthycontrolsresultsfromtheeuropeangeneenvironmentinteractionsstudy AT valmaggialuciar sexdifferencesincognitivefunctioningofpatientsatriskforpsychosisandhealthycontrolsresultsfromtheeuropeangeneenvironmentinteractionsstudy AT kemptonmatthewj sexdifferencesincognitivefunctioningofpatientsatriskforpsychosisandhealthycontrolsresultsfromtheeuropeangeneenvironmentinteractionsstudy AT vandergaagmark sexdifferencesincognitivefunctioningofpatientsatriskforpsychosisandhealthycontrolsresultsfromtheeuropeangeneenvironmentinteractionsstudy AT dehaanlieuwe sexdifferencesincognitivefunctioningofpatientsatriskforpsychosisandhealthycontrolsresultsfromtheeuropeangeneenvironmentinteractionsstudy AT nelsonbarnaby sexdifferencesincognitivefunctioningofpatientsatriskforpsychosisandhealthycontrolsresultsfromtheeuropeangeneenvironmentinteractionsstudy AT bressanrodrigoa sexdifferencesincognitivefunctioningofpatientsatriskforpsychosisandhealthycontrolsresultsfromtheeuropeangeneenvironmentinteractionsstudy AT barrantesvidalneus sexdifferencesincognitivefunctioningofpatientsatriskforpsychosisandhealthycontrolsresultsfromtheeuropeangeneenvironmentinteractionsstudy AT jantaccelia sexdifferencesincognitivefunctioningofpatientsatriskforpsychosisandhealthycontrolsresultsfromtheeuropeangeneenvironmentinteractionsstudy AT nordentoftmerete sexdifferencesincognitivefunctioningofpatientsatriskforpsychosisandhealthycontrolsresultsfromtheeuropeangeneenvironmentinteractionsstudy AT ruhrmannstephan sexdifferencesincognitivefunctioningofpatientsatriskforpsychosisandhealthycontrolsresultsfromtheeuropeangeneenvironmentinteractionsstudy AT sachsgarbiele sexdifferencesincognitivefunctioningofpatientsatriskforpsychosisandhealthycontrolsresultsfromtheeuropeangeneenvironmentinteractionsstudy AT ruttenbartp sexdifferencesincognitivefunctioningofpatientsatriskforpsychosisandhealthycontrolsresultsfromtheeuropeangeneenvironmentinteractionsstudy AT vanosjim sexdifferencesincognitivefunctioningofpatientsatriskforpsychosisandhealthycontrolsresultsfromtheeuropeangeneenvironmentinteractionsstudy AT riecherrossleranita sexdifferencesincognitivefunctioningofpatientsatriskforpsychosisandhealthycontrolsresultsfromtheeuropeangeneenvironmentinteractionsstudy AT sexdifferencesincognitivefunctioningofpatientsatriskforpsychosisandhealthycontrolsresultsfromtheeuropeangeneenvironmentinteractionsstudy |