Cargando…

Sex differences in cognitive functioning of patients at-risk for psychosis and healthy controls: Results from the European Gene–Environment Interactions study

BACKGROUND. Sex differences in cognitive functioning have long been recognized in schizophrenia patients and healthy controls (HC). However, few studies have focused on patients with an at-risk mental state (ARMS) for psychosis. Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate sex differences i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Menghini-Müller, Stephanie, Studerus, Erich, Ittig, Sarah, Valmaggia, Lucia R., Kempton, Matthew J., van der Gaag, Mark, de Haan, Lieuwe, Nelson, Barnaby, Bressan, Rodrigo A., Barrantes-Vidal, Neus, Jantac, Célia, Nordentoft, Merete, Ruhrmann, Stephan, Sachs, Garbiele, Rutten, Bart P., van Os, Jim, Riecher-Rössler, Anita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7315874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32167444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2019.10
_version_ 1783550334199660544
author Menghini-Müller, Stephanie
Studerus, Erich
Ittig, Sarah
Valmaggia, Lucia R.
Kempton, Matthew J.
van der Gaag, Mark
de Haan, Lieuwe
Nelson, Barnaby
Bressan, Rodrigo A.
Barrantes-Vidal, Neus
Jantac, Célia
Nordentoft, Merete
Ruhrmann, Stephan
Sachs, Garbiele
Rutten, Bart P.
van Os, Jim
Riecher-Rössler, Anita
author_facet Menghini-Müller, Stephanie
Studerus, Erich
Ittig, Sarah
Valmaggia, Lucia R.
Kempton, Matthew J.
van der Gaag, Mark
de Haan, Lieuwe
Nelson, Barnaby
Bressan, Rodrigo A.
Barrantes-Vidal, Neus
Jantac, Célia
Nordentoft, Merete
Ruhrmann, Stephan
Sachs, Garbiele
Rutten, Bart P.
van Os, Jim
Riecher-Rössler, Anita
author_sort Menghini-Müller, Stephanie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND. Sex differences in cognitive functioning have long been recognized in schizophrenia patients and healthy controls (HC). However, few studies have focused on patients with an at-risk mental state (ARMS) for psychosis. Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate sex differences in neurocognitive performance in ARMS patients compared with HC. METHODS. The data analyzed in this study were collected within the multicenter European Gene–Environment Interactions study (11 centers). A total of 343 ARMS patients (158 women) and 67 HC subjects (33 women) were included. All participants completed a comprehensive neurocognitive battery. Linear mixed effects models were used to explore whether sex differences in cognitive functioning were present in the total group (main effect of sex) and whether sex differences were different for HC and ARMS (interaction between sex and group). RESULTS. Women performed better in social cognition, speed of processing, and verbal learning than men regardless of whether they were ARMS or HC. However, only differences in speed of processing and verbal learning remained significant after correction for multiple testing. Additionally, ARMS patients displayed alterations in attention, current IQ, speed of processing, verbal learning, and working memory compared with HC. CONCLUSIONS. Findings indicate that sex differences in cognitive functioning in ARMS are similar to those seen between healthy men and women. Thus, it appears that sex differences in cognitive performance may not be specific for ARMS, a finding resembling that in patients with schizophrenic psychoses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7315874
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73158742020-07-07 Sex differences in cognitive functioning of patients at-risk for psychosis and healthy controls: Results from the European Gene–Environment Interactions study Menghini-Müller, Stephanie Studerus, Erich Ittig, Sarah Valmaggia, Lucia R. Kempton, Matthew J. van der Gaag, Mark de Haan, Lieuwe Nelson, Barnaby Bressan, Rodrigo A. Barrantes-Vidal, Neus Jantac, Célia Nordentoft, Merete Ruhrmann, Stephan Sachs, Garbiele Rutten, Bart P. van Os, Jim Riecher-Rössler, Anita Eur Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND. Sex differences in cognitive functioning have long been recognized in schizophrenia patients and healthy controls (HC). However, few studies have focused on patients with an at-risk mental state (ARMS) for psychosis. Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate sex differences in neurocognitive performance in ARMS patients compared with HC. METHODS. The data analyzed in this study were collected within the multicenter European Gene–Environment Interactions study (11 centers). A total of 343 ARMS patients (158 women) and 67 HC subjects (33 women) were included. All participants completed a comprehensive neurocognitive battery. Linear mixed effects models were used to explore whether sex differences in cognitive functioning were present in the total group (main effect of sex) and whether sex differences were different for HC and ARMS (interaction between sex and group). RESULTS. Women performed better in social cognition, speed of processing, and verbal learning than men regardless of whether they were ARMS or HC. However, only differences in speed of processing and verbal learning remained significant after correction for multiple testing. Additionally, ARMS patients displayed alterations in attention, current IQ, speed of processing, verbal learning, and working memory compared with HC. CONCLUSIONS. Findings indicate that sex differences in cognitive functioning in ARMS are similar to those seen between healthy men and women. Thus, it appears that sex differences in cognitive performance may not be specific for ARMS, a finding resembling that in patients with schizophrenic psychoses. Cambridge University Press 2020-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7315874/ /pubmed/32167444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2019.10 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Menghini-Müller, Stephanie
Studerus, Erich
Ittig, Sarah
Valmaggia, Lucia R.
Kempton, Matthew J.
van der Gaag, Mark
de Haan, Lieuwe
Nelson, Barnaby
Bressan, Rodrigo A.
Barrantes-Vidal, Neus
Jantac, Célia
Nordentoft, Merete
Ruhrmann, Stephan
Sachs, Garbiele
Rutten, Bart P.
van Os, Jim
Riecher-Rössler, Anita
Sex differences in cognitive functioning of patients at-risk for psychosis and healthy controls: Results from the European Gene–Environment Interactions study
title Sex differences in cognitive functioning of patients at-risk for psychosis and healthy controls: Results from the European Gene–Environment Interactions study
title_full Sex differences in cognitive functioning of patients at-risk for psychosis and healthy controls: Results from the European Gene–Environment Interactions study
title_fullStr Sex differences in cognitive functioning of patients at-risk for psychosis and healthy controls: Results from the European Gene–Environment Interactions study
title_full_unstemmed Sex differences in cognitive functioning of patients at-risk for psychosis and healthy controls: Results from the European Gene–Environment Interactions study
title_short Sex differences in cognitive functioning of patients at-risk for psychosis and healthy controls: Results from the European Gene–Environment Interactions study
title_sort sex differences in cognitive functioning of patients at-risk for psychosis and healthy controls: results from the european gene–environment interactions study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7315874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32167444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2019.10
work_keys_str_mv AT menghinimullerstephanie sexdifferencesincognitivefunctioningofpatientsatriskforpsychosisandhealthycontrolsresultsfromtheeuropeangeneenvironmentinteractionsstudy
AT studeruserich sexdifferencesincognitivefunctioningofpatientsatriskforpsychosisandhealthycontrolsresultsfromtheeuropeangeneenvironmentinteractionsstudy
AT ittigsarah sexdifferencesincognitivefunctioningofpatientsatriskforpsychosisandhealthycontrolsresultsfromtheeuropeangeneenvironmentinteractionsstudy
AT valmaggialuciar sexdifferencesincognitivefunctioningofpatientsatriskforpsychosisandhealthycontrolsresultsfromtheeuropeangeneenvironmentinteractionsstudy
AT kemptonmatthewj sexdifferencesincognitivefunctioningofpatientsatriskforpsychosisandhealthycontrolsresultsfromtheeuropeangeneenvironmentinteractionsstudy
AT vandergaagmark sexdifferencesincognitivefunctioningofpatientsatriskforpsychosisandhealthycontrolsresultsfromtheeuropeangeneenvironmentinteractionsstudy
AT dehaanlieuwe sexdifferencesincognitivefunctioningofpatientsatriskforpsychosisandhealthycontrolsresultsfromtheeuropeangeneenvironmentinteractionsstudy
AT nelsonbarnaby sexdifferencesincognitivefunctioningofpatientsatriskforpsychosisandhealthycontrolsresultsfromtheeuropeangeneenvironmentinteractionsstudy
AT bressanrodrigoa sexdifferencesincognitivefunctioningofpatientsatriskforpsychosisandhealthycontrolsresultsfromtheeuropeangeneenvironmentinteractionsstudy
AT barrantesvidalneus sexdifferencesincognitivefunctioningofpatientsatriskforpsychosisandhealthycontrolsresultsfromtheeuropeangeneenvironmentinteractionsstudy
AT jantaccelia sexdifferencesincognitivefunctioningofpatientsatriskforpsychosisandhealthycontrolsresultsfromtheeuropeangeneenvironmentinteractionsstudy
AT nordentoftmerete sexdifferencesincognitivefunctioningofpatientsatriskforpsychosisandhealthycontrolsresultsfromtheeuropeangeneenvironmentinteractionsstudy
AT ruhrmannstephan sexdifferencesincognitivefunctioningofpatientsatriskforpsychosisandhealthycontrolsresultsfromtheeuropeangeneenvironmentinteractionsstudy
AT sachsgarbiele sexdifferencesincognitivefunctioningofpatientsatriskforpsychosisandhealthycontrolsresultsfromtheeuropeangeneenvironmentinteractionsstudy
AT ruttenbartp sexdifferencesincognitivefunctioningofpatientsatriskforpsychosisandhealthycontrolsresultsfromtheeuropeangeneenvironmentinteractionsstudy
AT vanosjim sexdifferencesincognitivefunctioningofpatientsatriskforpsychosisandhealthycontrolsresultsfromtheeuropeangeneenvironmentinteractionsstudy
AT riecherrossleranita sexdifferencesincognitivefunctioningofpatientsatriskforpsychosisandhealthycontrolsresultsfromtheeuropeangeneenvironmentinteractionsstudy
AT sexdifferencesincognitivefunctioningofpatientsatriskforpsychosisandhealthycontrolsresultsfromtheeuropeangeneenvironmentinteractionsstudy