Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in treatment of cesarean section skin scars: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Pathological skin scars, caused by cesarean section, affected younger mothers esthetically and psychosocially and to some extent frustrated obstetricians and dermatologists. Umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs), as a population of multipotent cells, are abundant in human tissu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fan, Dazhi, Zeng, Meng, Xia, Qing, Wu, Shuzhen, Ye, Shaoxin, Rao, Jiaming, Lin, Dongxin, Zhang, Huishan, Ma, Huiting, Han, Zhongchao, Guo, Xiaoling, Liu, Zhengping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7316165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32586366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13287-020-01695-7
_version_ 1783550386334859264
author Fan, Dazhi
Zeng, Meng
Xia, Qing
Wu, Shuzhen
Ye, Shaoxin
Rao, Jiaming
Lin, Dongxin
Zhang, Huishan
Ma, Huiting
Han, Zhongchao
Guo, Xiaoling
Liu, Zhengping
author_facet Fan, Dazhi
Zeng, Meng
Xia, Qing
Wu, Shuzhen
Ye, Shaoxin
Rao, Jiaming
Lin, Dongxin
Zhang, Huishan
Ma, Huiting
Han, Zhongchao
Guo, Xiaoling
Liu, Zhengping
author_sort Fan, Dazhi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pathological skin scars, caused by cesarean section, affected younger mothers esthetically and psychosocially and to some extent frustrated obstetricians and dermatologists. Umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs), as a population of multipotent cells, are abundant in human tissues, providing several possibilities for their effects on skin scar tissues. Herein, we performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-arm clinical trial, aiming to assess the efficacy and safety of UC-MSCs in the treatment of cesarean section skin scars among primiparous singleton pregnant women. METHODS: Ninety primiparous singleton pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean section were randomly allocated to receive placebo, low-dose (3 × 10(6) cells), or high-dose (6 × 10(6) cells) transdermal hydrogel UC-MSCs on the surface of the skin incision. The primary outcome was cesarean section skin scars followed after the sixth month, assessed by the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS). RESULTS: All the participants completed their trial of the primary outcome according to the protocol. The mean score of estimated total VSS was 5.52 in all participants at the sixth-month follow-up, with 6.43 in the placebo group, 5.18 in the low-dose group, and 4.71 in the high-dose group, respectively. No significant difference was found between-group in the mean scores for VSS at the sixth month. Additional prespecified secondary outcomes were not found with significant differences among groups either. No obvious side effects or adverse effects were reported in any of the three arms. CONCLUSION: This randomized clinical trial showed that UC-MSCs did not demonstrate the effects of improvement of cesarean section skin scars. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02772289. Registered on 13 May 2016.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7316165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73161652020-06-25 Efficacy and safety of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in treatment of cesarean section skin scars: a randomized clinical trial Fan, Dazhi Zeng, Meng Xia, Qing Wu, Shuzhen Ye, Shaoxin Rao, Jiaming Lin, Dongxin Zhang, Huishan Ma, Huiting Han, Zhongchao Guo, Xiaoling Liu, Zhengping Stem Cell Res Ther Research BACKGROUND: Pathological skin scars, caused by cesarean section, affected younger mothers esthetically and psychosocially and to some extent frustrated obstetricians and dermatologists. Umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs), as a population of multipotent cells, are abundant in human tissues, providing several possibilities for their effects on skin scar tissues. Herein, we performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-arm clinical trial, aiming to assess the efficacy and safety of UC-MSCs in the treatment of cesarean section skin scars among primiparous singleton pregnant women. METHODS: Ninety primiparous singleton pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean section were randomly allocated to receive placebo, low-dose (3 × 10(6) cells), or high-dose (6 × 10(6) cells) transdermal hydrogel UC-MSCs on the surface of the skin incision. The primary outcome was cesarean section skin scars followed after the sixth month, assessed by the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS). RESULTS: All the participants completed their trial of the primary outcome according to the protocol. The mean score of estimated total VSS was 5.52 in all participants at the sixth-month follow-up, with 6.43 in the placebo group, 5.18 in the low-dose group, and 4.71 in the high-dose group, respectively. No significant difference was found between-group in the mean scores for VSS at the sixth month. Additional prespecified secondary outcomes were not found with significant differences among groups either. No obvious side effects or adverse effects were reported in any of the three arms. CONCLUSION: This randomized clinical trial showed that UC-MSCs did not demonstrate the effects of improvement of cesarean section skin scars. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02772289. Registered on 13 May 2016. BioMed Central 2020-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7316165/ /pubmed/32586366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13287-020-01695-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Fan, Dazhi
Zeng, Meng
Xia, Qing
Wu, Shuzhen
Ye, Shaoxin
Rao, Jiaming
Lin, Dongxin
Zhang, Huishan
Ma, Huiting
Han, Zhongchao
Guo, Xiaoling
Liu, Zhengping
Efficacy and safety of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in treatment of cesarean section skin scars: a randomized clinical trial
title Efficacy and safety of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in treatment of cesarean section skin scars: a randomized clinical trial
title_full Efficacy and safety of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in treatment of cesarean section skin scars: a randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in treatment of cesarean section skin scars: a randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in treatment of cesarean section skin scars: a randomized clinical trial
title_short Efficacy and safety of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in treatment of cesarean section skin scars: a randomized clinical trial
title_sort efficacy and safety of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in treatment of cesarean section skin scars: a randomized clinical trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7316165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32586366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13287-020-01695-7
work_keys_str_mv AT fandazhi efficacyandsafetyofumbilicalcordmesenchymalstemcellsintreatmentofcesareansectionskinscarsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT zengmeng efficacyandsafetyofumbilicalcordmesenchymalstemcellsintreatmentofcesareansectionskinscarsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT xiaqing efficacyandsafetyofumbilicalcordmesenchymalstemcellsintreatmentofcesareansectionskinscarsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT wushuzhen efficacyandsafetyofumbilicalcordmesenchymalstemcellsintreatmentofcesareansectionskinscarsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT yeshaoxin efficacyandsafetyofumbilicalcordmesenchymalstemcellsintreatmentofcesareansectionskinscarsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT raojiaming efficacyandsafetyofumbilicalcordmesenchymalstemcellsintreatmentofcesareansectionskinscarsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT lindongxin efficacyandsafetyofumbilicalcordmesenchymalstemcellsintreatmentofcesareansectionskinscarsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT zhanghuishan efficacyandsafetyofumbilicalcordmesenchymalstemcellsintreatmentofcesareansectionskinscarsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT mahuiting efficacyandsafetyofumbilicalcordmesenchymalstemcellsintreatmentofcesareansectionskinscarsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT hanzhongchao efficacyandsafetyofumbilicalcordmesenchymalstemcellsintreatmentofcesareansectionskinscarsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT guoxiaoling efficacyandsafetyofumbilicalcordmesenchymalstemcellsintreatmentofcesareansectionskinscarsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT liuzhengping efficacyandsafetyofumbilicalcordmesenchymalstemcellsintreatmentofcesareansectionskinscarsarandomizedclinicaltrial