Cargando…

Irradiation with 365 nm and 405 nm wavelength shows differences in DNA damage of swine pancreatic islets

INTRODUCTION: 3D printing is being used more extensively in modern biomedicine. One of the problems is selecting a proper crosslinking method of bioprinted material. Amongst currently used techniques we can distinguish: physical crosslinking (e.g. Ca(2+) and Sr(2+)) and chemical crosslinking–the UV...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klak, M., Gomółka, M., Dobrzański, T., Tymicki, G., Cywoniuk, P., Kowalska, P., Kosowska, K., Bryniarski, T., Berman, A., Dobrzyń, A., Idaszek, J., Święszkowski, W., Wszoła, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7316267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32584858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235052
_version_ 1783550402797502464
author Klak, M.
Gomółka, M.
Dobrzański, T.
Tymicki, G.
Cywoniuk, P.
Kowalska, P.
Kosowska, K.
Bryniarski, T.
Berman, A.
Dobrzyń, A.
Idaszek, J.
Święszkowski, W.
Wszoła, M.
author_facet Klak, M.
Gomółka, M.
Dobrzański, T.
Tymicki, G.
Cywoniuk, P.
Kowalska, P.
Kosowska, K.
Bryniarski, T.
Berman, A.
Dobrzyń, A.
Idaszek, J.
Święszkowski, W.
Wszoła, M.
author_sort Klak, M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: 3D printing is being used more extensively in modern biomedicine. One of the problems is selecting a proper crosslinking method of bioprinted material. Amongst currently used techniques we can distinguish: physical crosslinking (e.g. Ca(2+) and Sr(2+)) and chemical crosslinking–the UV light crosslinking causing the biggest discussion. UV radiation is selectively absorbed by DNA, mainly in the UV-B region but also (to some extent) in UV-A and UV-C regions. DNA excitement results in typical photoproducts. The amount of strand breaks may vary depending on the period of exposition, it can also differ when cells undergo incubation after radiation. AIM: The aim of this study was to show whether and how the time of irradiation with 405 nm and 365 nm wavelengths affect DNA damage in cell lines and micro-organs (pancreatic islets). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The degree of DNA damage caused by different wavelengths of radiation (405 nm and 365 nm) was evaluated by a comet assay. The test was performed on fibroblasts, alpha cells, beta cells and porcine pancreatic islets after 24 hours incubation period. Samples without radiation treatment were selected as a control group. Results analysis consisted of determining the percent of cells with damaged DNA and the tail intensity evaluation. RESULTS: The degree of DNA damage in pancreatic islets after exposure to 405 nm wavelength oscillated between 2% and 6% depending on the tested time period (10 – 300 seconds). However, treating islets using 365 nm wavelength resulted in damage up to 50%. This clearly shows significantly less damage when using 405 nm wavelength. Similar results were obtained for the tested cell lines. CONCLUSIONS: Crosslinking with 405 nm is better for pancreatic islets than crosslinking with 365 nm UV light.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7316267
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73162672020-06-30 Irradiation with 365 nm and 405 nm wavelength shows differences in DNA damage of swine pancreatic islets Klak, M. Gomółka, M. Dobrzański, T. Tymicki, G. Cywoniuk, P. Kowalska, P. Kosowska, K. Bryniarski, T. Berman, A. Dobrzyń, A. Idaszek, J. Święszkowski, W. Wszoła, M. PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: 3D printing is being used more extensively in modern biomedicine. One of the problems is selecting a proper crosslinking method of bioprinted material. Amongst currently used techniques we can distinguish: physical crosslinking (e.g. Ca(2+) and Sr(2+)) and chemical crosslinking–the UV light crosslinking causing the biggest discussion. UV radiation is selectively absorbed by DNA, mainly in the UV-B region but also (to some extent) in UV-A and UV-C regions. DNA excitement results in typical photoproducts. The amount of strand breaks may vary depending on the period of exposition, it can also differ when cells undergo incubation after radiation. AIM: The aim of this study was to show whether and how the time of irradiation with 405 nm and 365 nm wavelengths affect DNA damage in cell lines and micro-organs (pancreatic islets). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The degree of DNA damage caused by different wavelengths of radiation (405 nm and 365 nm) was evaluated by a comet assay. The test was performed on fibroblasts, alpha cells, beta cells and porcine pancreatic islets after 24 hours incubation period. Samples without radiation treatment were selected as a control group. Results analysis consisted of determining the percent of cells with damaged DNA and the tail intensity evaluation. RESULTS: The degree of DNA damage in pancreatic islets after exposure to 405 nm wavelength oscillated between 2% and 6% depending on the tested time period (10 – 300 seconds). However, treating islets using 365 nm wavelength resulted in damage up to 50%. This clearly shows significantly less damage when using 405 nm wavelength. Similar results were obtained for the tested cell lines. CONCLUSIONS: Crosslinking with 405 nm is better for pancreatic islets than crosslinking with 365 nm UV light. Public Library of Science 2020-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7316267/ /pubmed/32584858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235052 Text en © 2020 Klak et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Klak, M.
Gomółka, M.
Dobrzański, T.
Tymicki, G.
Cywoniuk, P.
Kowalska, P.
Kosowska, K.
Bryniarski, T.
Berman, A.
Dobrzyń, A.
Idaszek, J.
Święszkowski, W.
Wszoła, M.
Irradiation with 365 nm and 405 nm wavelength shows differences in DNA damage of swine pancreatic islets
title Irradiation with 365 nm and 405 nm wavelength shows differences in DNA damage of swine pancreatic islets
title_full Irradiation with 365 nm and 405 nm wavelength shows differences in DNA damage of swine pancreatic islets
title_fullStr Irradiation with 365 nm and 405 nm wavelength shows differences in DNA damage of swine pancreatic islets
title_full_unstemmed Irradiation with 365 nm and 405 nm wavelength shows differences in DNA damage of swine pancreatic islets
title_short Irradiation with 365 nm and 405 nm wavelength shows differences in DNA damage of swine pancreatic islets
title_sort irradiation with 365 nm and 405 nm wavelength shows differences in dna damage of swine pancreatic islets
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7316267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32584858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235052
work_keys_str_mv AT klakm irradiationwith365nmand405nmwavelengthshowsdifferencesindnadamageofswinepancreaticislets
AT gomołkam irradiationwith365nmand405nmwavelengthshowsdifferencesindnadamageofswinepancreaticislets
AT dobrzanskit irradiationwith365nmand405nmwavelengthshowsdifferencesindnadamageofswinepancreaticislets
AT tymickig irradiationwith365nmand405nmwavelengthshowsdifferencesindnadamageofswinepancreaticislets
AT cywoniukp irradiationwith365nmand405nmwavelengthshowsdifferencesindnadamageofswinepancreaticislets
AT kowalskap irradiationwith365nmand405nmwavelengthshowsdifferencesindnadamageofswinepancreaticislets
AT kosowskak irradiationwith365nmand405nmwavelengthshowsdifferencesindnadamageofswinepancreaticislets
AT bryniarskit irradiationwith365nmand405nmwavelengthshowsdifferencesindnadamageofswinepancreaticislets
AT bermana irradiationwith365nmand405nmwavelengthshowsdifferencesindnadamageofswinepancreaticislets
AT dobrzyna irradiationwith365nmand405nmwavelengthshowsdifferencesindnadamageofswinepancreaticislets
AT idaszekj irradiationwith365nmand405nmwavelengthshowsdifferencesindnadamageofswinepancreaticislets
AT swieszkowskiw irradiationwith365nmand405nmwavelengthshowsdifferencesindnadamageofswinepancreaticislets
AT wszołam irradiationwith365nmand405nmwavelengthshowsdifferencesindnadamageofswinepancreaticislets