Cargando…
Safety of Recombinant Influenza Vaccine Compared to Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Adults: An Observational Study
BACKGROUND: Recombinant trivalent influenza vaccine (RIV3) was initially licensed in 2013 and approved for all adults ≥18 in 2014. This study evaluated the safety of RIV3 compared with trivalent standard-dose, inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV3) in Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC). METH...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7316363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32617368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa179 |
_version_ | 1783550424155947008 |
---|---|
author | Hansen, John Goddard, Kristin Timbol, Julius Zhang, Lea Lewis, Ned Dunkle, Lisa Izikson, Ruvim Klein, Nicola P |
author_facet | Hansen, John Goddard, Kristin Timbol, Julius Zhang, Lea Lewis, Ned Dunkle, Lisa Izikson, Ruvim Klein, Nicola P |
author_sort | Hansen, John |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recombinant trivalent influenza vaccine (RIV3) was initially licensed in 2013 and approved for all adults ≥18 in 2014. This study evaluated the safety of RIV3 compared with trivalent standard-dose, inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV3) in Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC). METHODS: This Phase 4 observational, postmarketing safety study included persons ≥18 years vaccinated with RIV3 or IIV3 in KPNC during the 2015–2016 influenza season. We compared (1) the rates of prespecified diagnoses of interest (Guillain-Barré Syndrome, pericarditis, pleural effusion, narcolepsy/cataplexy, asthma, acute hypersensitivity reactions, and fever) during various postvaccination risk intervals as well as (2) all-cause hospitalization and mortality 0–180 days after vaccination. We estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using logistic regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, month of vaccination, and concomitant receipt of other vaccinations. RESULTS: Comparing the 21 976 persons who received RIV3 with the 283 683 who received IIV3, there were statistically significant differences in the prespecified diagnoses of interest between the 2 groups. Specifically, RIV3 vaccination was associated with fewer fever diagnoses during the 0–41 days postvaccination (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.14–0.86). Also, RIV3 was associated with fewer all-cause hospitalizations during the 0–180 days postvaccination (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.61–0.73), which was mostly related to pregnancy-related hospitalizations in IIV3 recipients. There were no serious adverse events or deaths related to RIV3. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not identify any safety concerns regarding the use of RIV3 in adults. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7316363 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73163632020-07-01 Safety of Recombinant Influenza Vaccine Compared to Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Adults: An Observational Study Hansen, John Goddard, Kristin Timbol, Julius Zhang, Lea Lewis, Ned Dunkle, Lisa Izikson, Ruvim Klein, Nicola P Open Forum Infect Dis Major Article BACKGROUND: Recombinant trivalent influenza vaccine (RIV3) was initially licensed in 2013 and approved for all adults ≥18 in 2014. This study evaluated the safety of RIV3 compared with trivalent standard-dose, inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV3) in Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC). METHODS: This Phase 4 observational, postmarketing safety study included persons ≥18 years vaccinated with RIV3 or IIV3 in KPNC during the 2015–2016 influenza season. We compared (1) the rates of prespecified diagnoses of interest (Guillain-Barré Syndrome, pericarditis, pleural effusion, narcolepsy/cataplexy, asthma, acute hypersensitivity reactions, and fever) during various postvaccination risk intervals as well as (2) all-cause hospitalization and mortality 0–180 days after vaccination. We estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using logistic regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, month of vaccination, and concomitant receipt of other vaccinations. RESULTS: Comparing the 21 976 persons who received RIV3 with the 283 683 who received IIV3, there were statistically significant differences in the prespecified diagnoses of interest between the 2 groups. Specifically, RIV3 vaccination was associated with fewer fever diagnoses during the 0–41 days postvaccination (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.14–0.86). Also, RIV3 was associated with fewer all-cause hospitalizations during the 0–180 days postvaccination (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.61–0.73), which was mostly related to pregnancy-related hospitalizations in IIV3 recipients. There were no serious adverse events or deaths related to RIV3. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not identify any safety concerns regarding the use of RIV3 in adults. Oxford University Press 2020-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7316363/ /pubmed/32617368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa179 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Major Article Hansen, John Goddard, Kristin Timbol, Julius Zhang, Lea Lewis, Ned Dunkle, Lisa Izikson, Ruvim Klein, Nicola P Safety of Recombinant Influenza Vaccine Compared to Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Adults: An Observational Study |
title | Safety of Recombinant Influenza Vaccine Compared to Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Adults: An Observational Study |
title_full | Safety of Recombinant Influenza Vaccine Compared to Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Adults: An Observational Study |
title_fullStr | Safety of Recombinant Influenza Vaccine Compared to Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Adults: An Observational Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety of Recombinant Influenza Vaccine Compared to Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Adults: An Observational Study |
title_short | Safety of Recombinant Influenza Vaccine Compared to Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Adults: An Observational Study |
title_sort | safety of recombinant influenza vaccine compared to inactivated influenza vaccine in adults: an observational study |
topic | Major Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7316363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32617368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa179 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hansenjohn safetyofrecombinantinfluenzavaccinecomparedtoinactivatedinfluenzavaccineinadultsanobservationalstudy AT goddardkristin safetyofrecombinantinfluenzavaccinecomparedtoinactivatedinfluenzavaccineinadultsanobservationalstudy AT timboljulius safetyofrecombinantinfluenzavaccinecomparedtoinactivatedinfluenzavaccineinadultsanobservationalstudy AT zhanglea safetyofrecombinantinfluenzavaccinecomparedtoinactivatedinfluenzavaccineinadultsanobservationalstudy AT lewisned safetyofrecombinantinfluenzavaccinecomparedtoinactivatedinfluenzavaccineinadultsanobservationalstudy AT dunklelisa safetyofrecombinantinfluenzavaccinecomparedtoinactivatedinfluenzavaccineinadultsanobservationalstudy AT iziksonruvim safetyofrecombinantinfluenzavaccinecomparedtoinactivatedinfluenzavaccineinadultsanobservationalstudy AT kleinnicolap safetyofrecombinantinfluenzavaccinecomparedtoinactivatedinfluenzavaccineinadultsanobservationalstudy |