Cargando…

Safety of Recombinant Influenza Vaccine Compared to Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Adults: An Observational Study

BACKGROUND: Recombinant trivalent influenza vaccine (RIV3) was initially licensed in 2013 and approved for all adults ≥18 in 2014. This study evaluated the safety of RIV3 compared with trivalent standard-dose, inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV3) in Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC). METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hansen, John, Goddard, Kristin, Timbol, Julius, Zhang, Lea, Lewis, Ned, Dunkle, Lisa, Izikson, Ruvim, Klein, Nicola P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7316363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32617368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa179
_version_ 1783550424155947008
author Hansen, John
Goddard, Kristin
Timbol, Julius
Zhang, Lea
Lewis, Ned
Dunkle, Lisa
Izikson, Ruvim
Klein, Nicola P
author_facet Hansen, John
Goddard, Kristin
Timbol, Julius
Zhang, Lea
Lewis, Ned
Dunkle, Lisa
Izikson, Ruvim
Klein, Nicola P
author_sort Hansen, John
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recombinant trivalent influenza vaccine (RIV3) was initially licensed in 2013 and approved for all adults ≥18 in 2014. This study evaluated the safety of RIV3 compared with trivalent standard-dose, inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV3) in Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC). METHODS: This Phase 4 observational, postmarketing safety study included persons ≥18 years vaccinated with RIV3 or IIV3 in KPNC during the 2015–2016 influenza season. We compared (1) the rates of prespecified diagnoses of interest (Guillain-Barré Syndrome, pericarditis, pleural effusion, narcolepsy/cataplexy, asthma, acute hypersensitivity reactions, and fever) during various postvaccination risk intervals as well as (2) all-cause hospitalization and mortality 0–180 days after vaccination. We estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using logistic regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, month of vaccination, and concomitant receipt of other vaccinations. RESULTS: Comparing the 21 976 persons who received RIV3 with the 283 683 who received IIV3, there were statistically significant differences in the prespecified diagnoses of interest between the 2 groups. Specifically, RIV3 vaccination was associated with fewer fever diagnoses during the 0–41 days postvaccination (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.14–0.86). Also, RIV3 was associated with fewer all-cause hospitalizations during the 0–180 days postvaccination (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.61–0.73), which was mostly related to pregnancy-related hospitalizations in IIV3 recipients. There were no serious adverse events or deaths related to RIV3. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not identify any safety concerns regarding the use of RIV3 in adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7316363
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73163632020-07-01 Safety of Recombinant Influenza Vaccine Compared to Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Adults: An Observational Study Hansen, John Goddard, Kristin Timbol, Julius Zhang, Lea Lewis, Ned Dunkle, Lisa Izikson, Ruvim Klein, Nicola P Open Forum Infect Dis Major Article BACKGROUND: Recombinant trivalent influenza vaccine (RIV3) was initially licensed in 2013 and approved for all adults ≥18 in 2014. This study evaluated the safety of RIV3 compared with trivalent standard-dose, inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV3) in Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC). METHODS: This Phase 4 observational, postmarketing safety study included persons ≥18 years vaccinated with RIV3 or IIV3 in KPNC during the 2015–2016 influenza season. We compared (1) the rates of prespecified diagnoses of interest (Guillain-Barré Syndrome, pericarditis, pleural effusion, narcolepsy/cataplexy, asthma, acute hypersensitivity reactions, and fever) during various postvaccination risk intervals as well as (2) all-cause hospitalization and mortality 0–180 days after vaccination. We estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using logistic regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, month of vaccination, and concomitant receipt of other vaccinations. RESULTS: Comparing the 21 976 persons who received RIV3 with the 283 683 who received IIV3, there were statistically significant differences in the prespecified diagnoses of interest between the 2 groups. Specifically, RIV3 vaccination was associated with fewer fever diagnoses during the 0–41 days postvaccination (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.14–0.86). Also, RIV3 was associated with fewer all-cause hospitalizations during the 0–180 days postvaccination (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.61–0.73), which was mostly related to pregnancy-related hospitalizations in IIV3 recipients. There were no serious adverse events or deaths related to RIV3. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not identify any safety concerns regarding the use of RIV3 in adults. Oxford University Press 2020-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7316363/ /pubmed/32617368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa179 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Major Article
Hansen, John
Goddard, Kristin
Timbol, Julius
Zhang, Lea
Lewis, Ned
Dunkle, Lisa
Izikson, Ruvim
Klein, Nicola P
Safety of Recombinant Influenza Vaccine Compared to Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Adults: An Observational Study
title Safety of Recombinant Influenza Vaccine Compared to Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Adults: An Observational Study
title_full Safety of Recombinant Influenza Vaccine Compared to Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Adults: An Observational Study
title_fullStr Safety of Recombinant Influenza Vaccine Compared to Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Adults: An Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed Safety of Recombinant Influenza Vaccine Compared to Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Adults: An Observational Study
title_short Safety of Recombinant Influenza Vaccine Compared to Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Adults: An Observational Study
title_sort safety of recombinant influenza vaccine compared to inactivated influenza vaccine in adults: an observational study
topic Major Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7316363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32617368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa179
work_keys_str_mv AT hansenjohn safetyofrecombinantinfluenzavaccinecomparedtoinactivatedinfluenzavaccineinadultsanobservationalstudy
AT goddardkristin safetyofrecombinantinfluenzavaccinecomparedtoinactivatedinfluenzavaccineinadultsanobservationalstudy
AT timboljulius safetyofrecombinantinfluenzavaccinecomparedtoinactivatedinfluenzavaccineinadultsanobservationalstudy
AT zhanglea safetyofrecombinantinfluenzavaccinecomparedtoinactivatedinfluenzavaccineinadultsanobservationalstudy
AT lewisned safetyofrecombinantinfluenzavaccinecomparedtoinactivatedinfluenzavaccineinadultsanobservationalstudy
AT dunklelisa safetyofrecombinantinfluenzavaccinecomparedtoinactivatedinfluenzavaccineinadultsanobservationalstudy
AT iziksonruvim safetyofrecombinantinfluenzavaccinecomparedtoinactivatedinfluenzavaccineinadultsanobservationalstudy
AT kleinnicolap safetyofrecombinantinfluenzavaccinecomparedtoinactivatedinfluenzavaccineinadultsanobservationalstudy