Cargando…
Ultrafast x-ray and electron scattering of free molecules: A comparative evaluation
Resolving gas phase molecular motions with simultaneous spatial and temporal resolution is rapidly coming within the reach of x-ray Free Electron Lasers (XFELs) and Mega-electron-Volt (MeV) electron beams. These two methods enable scattering experiments that have yielded fascinating new results, and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Crystallographic Association
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7316516/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32637459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/4.0000010 |
_version_ | 1783550447918776320 |
---|---|
author | Ma, Lingyu Yong, Haiwang Geiser, Joseph D. Moreno Carrascosa, Andrés Goff, Nathan Weber, Peter M. |
author_facet | Ma, Lingyu Yong, Haiwang Geiser, Joseph D. Moreno Carrascosa, Andrés Goff, Nathan Weber, Peter M. |
author_sort | Ma, Lingyu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Resolving gas phase molecular motions with simultaneous spatial and temporal resolution is rapidly coming within the reach of x-ray Free Electron Lasers (XFELs) and Mega-electron-Volt (MeV) electron beams. These two methods enable scattering experiments that have yielded fascinating new results, and while both are important methods for determining transient molecular structures in photochemical reactions, it is important to understand their relative merits. In the present study, we evaluate the respective scattering cross sections of the two methods and simulate their ability to determine excited state molecular structures in light of currently existing XFEL and MeV source parameters. Using the example of optically excited N-methyl morpholine and simulating the scattering patterns with shot noise, we find that the currently achievable signals are superior with x-ray scattering for equal samples and on a per-shot basis and that x-ray scattering requires fewer detected signal counts for an equal fidelity structure determination. Importantly, within the independent atom model, excellent structure determinations can be achieved for scattering vectors only to about 5 Å(−1), leaving larger scattering vector ranges for investigating vibrational motions and wavepackets. Electron scattering has a comparatively higher sensitivity toward hydrogen atoms, which may point to applications where electron scattering is inherently the preferred choice, provided that excellent signals can be achieved at large scattering angles that are currently difficult to access. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7316516 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | American Crystallographic Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73165162020-07-06 Ultrafast x-ray and electron scattering of free molecules: A comparative evaluation Ma, Lingyu Yong, Haiwang Geiser, Joseph D. Moreno Carrascosa, Andrés Goff, Nathan Weber, Peter M. Struct Dyn ARTICLES Resolving gas phase molecular motions with simultaneous spatial and temporal resolution is rapidly coming within the reach of x-ray Free Electron Lasers (XFELs) and Mega-electron-Volt (MeV) electron beams. These two methods enable scattering experiments that have yielded fascinating new results, and while both are important methods for determining transient molecular structures in photochemical reactions, it is important to understand their relative merits. In the present study, we evaluate the respective scattering cross sections of the two methods and simulate their ability to determine excited state molecular structures in light of currently existing XFEL and MeV source parameters. Using the example of optically excited N-methyl morpholine and simulating the scattering patterns with shot noise, we find that the currently achievable signals are superior with x-ray scattering for equal samples and on a per-shot basis and that x-ray scattering requires fewer detected signal counts for an equal fidelity structure determination. Importantly, within the independent atom model, excellent structure determinations can be achieved for scattering vectors only to about 5 Å(−1), leaving larger scattering vector ranges for investigating vibrational motions and wavepackets. Electron scattering has a comparatively higher sensitivity toward hydrogen atoms, which may point to applications where electron scattering is inherently the preferred choice, provided that excellent signals can be achieved at large scattering angles that are currently difficult to access. American Crystallographic Association 2020-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7316516/ /pubmed/32637459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/4.0000010 Text en © 2020 Author(s). 2329-7778/2020/7(3)/034102/12 All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | ARTICLES Ma, Lingyu Yong, Haiwang Geiser, Joseph D. Moreno Carrascosa, Andrés Goff, Nathan Weber, Peter M. Ultrafast x-ray and electron scattering of free molecules: A comparative evaluation |
title | Ultrafast x-ray and electron scattering of free molecules: A comparative evaluation |
title_full | Ultrafast x-ray and electron scattering of free molecules: A comparative evaluation |
title_fullStr | Ultrafast x-ray and electron scattering of free molecules: A comparative evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Ultrafast x-ray and electron scattering of free molecules: A comparative evaluation |
title_short | Ultrafast x-ray and electron scattering of free molecules: A comparative evaluation |
title_sort | ultrafast x-ray and electron scattering of free molecules: a comparative evaluation |
topic | ARTICLES |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7316516/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32637459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/4.0000010 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT malingyu ultrafastxrayandelectronscatteringoffreemoleculesacomparativeevaluation AT yonghaiwang ultrafastxrayandelectronscatteringoffreemoleculesacomparativeevaluation AT geiserjosephd ultrafastxrayandelectronscatteringoffreemoleculesacomparativeevaluation AT morenocarrascosaandres ultrafastxrayandelectronscatteringoffreemoleculesacomparativeevaluation AT goffnathan ultrafastxrayandelectronscatteringoffreemoleculesacomparativeevaluation AT weberpeterm ultrafastxrayandelectronscatteringoffreemoleculesacomparativeevaluation |