Cargando…

Ultrafast x-ray and electron scattering of free molecules: A comparative evaluation

Resolving gas phase molecular motions with simultaneous spatial and temporal resolution is rapidly coming within the reach of x-ray Free Electron Lasers (XFELs) and Mega-electron-Volt (MeV) electron beams. These two methods enable scattering experiments that have yielded fascinating new results, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Lingyu, Yong, Haiwang, Geiser, Joseph D., Moreno Carrascosa, Andrés, Goff, Nathan, Weber, Peter M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Crystallographic Association 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7316516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32637459
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/4.0000010
_version_ 1783550447918776320
author Ma, Lingyu
Yong, Haiwang
Geiser, Joseph D.
Moreno Carrascosa, Andrés
Goff, Nathan
Weber, Peter M.
author_facet Ma, Lingyu
Yong, Haiwang
Geiser, Joseph D.
Moreno Carrascosa, Andrés
Goff, Nathan
Weber, Peter M.
author_sort Ma, Lingyu
collection PubMed
description Resolving gas phase molecular motions with simultaneous spatial and temporal resolution is rapidly coming within the reach of x-ray Free Electron Lasers (XFELs) and Mega-electron-Volt (MeV) electron beams. These two methods enable scattering experiments that have yielded fascinating new results, and while both are important methods for determining transient molecular structures in photochemical reactions, it is important to understand their relative merits. In the present study, we evaluate the respective scattering cross sections of the two methods and simulate their ability to determine excited state molecular structures in light of currently existing XFEL and MeV source parameters. Using the example of optically excited N-methyl morpholine and simulating the scattering patterns with shot noise, we find that the currently achievable signals are superior with x-ray scattering for equal samples and on a per-shot basis and that x-ray scattering requires fewer detected signal counts for an equal fidelity structure determination. Importantly, within the independent atom model, excellent structure determinations can be achieved for scattering vectors only to about 5 Å(−1), leaving larger scattering vector ranges for investigating vibrational motions and wavepackets. Electron scattering has a comparatively higher sensitivity toward hydrogen atoms, which may point to applications where electron scattering is inherently the preferred choice, provided that excellent signals can be achieved at large scattering angles that are currently difficult to access.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7316516
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Crystallographic Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73165162020-07-06 Ultrafast x-ray and electron scattering of free molecules: A comparative evaluation Ma, Lingyu Yong, Haiwang Geiser, Joseph D. Moreno Carrascosa, Andrés Goff, Nathan Weber, Peter M. Struct Dyn ARTICLES Resolving gas phase molecular motions with simultaneous spatial and temporal resolution is rapidly coming within the reach of x-ray Free Electron Lasers (XFELs) and Mega-electron-Volt (MeV) electron beams. These two methods enable scattering experiments that have yielded fascinating new results, and while both are important methods for determining transient molecular structures in photochemical reactions, it is important to understand their relative merits. In the present study, we evaluate the respective scattering cross sections of the two methods and simulate their ability to determine excited state molecular structures in light of currently existing XFEL and MeV source parameters. Using the example of optically excited N-methyl morpholine and simulating the scattering patterns with shot noise, we find that the currently achievable signals are superior with x-ray scattering for equal samples and on a per-shot basis and that x-ray scattering requires fewer detected signal counts for an equal fidelity structure determination. Importantly, within the independent atom model, excellent structure determinations can be achieved for scattering vectors only to about 5 Å(−1), leaving larger scattering vector ranges for investigating vibrational motions and wavepackets. Electron scattering has a comparatively higher sensitivity toward hydrogen atoms, which may point to applications where electron scattering is inherently the preferred choice, provided that excellent signals can be achieved at large scattering angles that are currently difficult to access. American Crystallographic Association 2020-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7316516/ /pubmed/32637459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/4.0000010 Text en © 2020 Author(s). 2329-7778/2020/7(3)/034102/12 All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle ARTICLES
Ma, Lingyu
Yong, Haiwang
Geiser, Joseph D.
Moreno Carrascosa, Andrés
Goff, Nathan
Weber, Peter M.
Ultrafast x-ray and electron scattering of free molecules: A comparative evaluation
title Ultrafast x-ray and electron scattering of free molecules: A comparative evaluation
title_full Ultrafast x-ray and electron scattering of free molecules: A comparative evaluation
title_fullStr Ultrafast x-ray and electron scattering of free molecules: A comparative evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Ultrafast x-ray and electron scattering of free molecules: A comparative evaluation
title_short Ultrafast x-ray and electron scattering of free molecules: A comparative evaluation
title_sort ultrafast x-ray and electron scattering of free molecules: a comparative evaluation
topic ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7316516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32637459
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/4.0000010
work_keys_str_mv AT malingyu ultrafastxrayandelectronscatteringoffreemoleculesacomparativeevaluation
AT yonghaiwang ultrafastxrayandelectronscatteringoffreemoleculesacomparativeevaluation
AT geiserjosephd ultrafastxrayandelectronscatteringoffreemoleculesacomparativeevaluation
AT morenocarrascosaandres ultrafastxrayandelectronscatteringoffreemoleculesacomparativeevaluation
AT goffnathan ultrafastxrayandelectronscatteringoffreemoleculesacomparativeevaluation
AT weberpeterm ultrafastxrayandelectronscatteringoffreemoleculesacomparativeevaluation