Cargando…
Clínical Audit of Primary Treatment of Open Fractures: Antibiotic Treatment and Tetanus Prophylaxis
Objective To evaluate whether the conducts involving antimicrobial treatment and prophylaxis against tetanus have been performed according to the Clinical Protocol of the Institution. Methods Descriptive and retrospective study conducted in patients of both genders, > 18 years old admitted to a...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Published by Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda
2020
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7316547/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32616972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-3402470 |
_version_ | 1783550454709354496 |
---|---|
author | Assunção, Adriana Lúcia Ferris de Oliveira de, Sílvia Teodoro |
author_facet | Assunção, Adriana Lúcia Ferris de Oliveira de, Sílvia Teodoro |
author_sort | Assunção, Adriana Lúcia Ferris de |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective To evaluate whether the conducts involving antimicrobial treatment and prophylaxis against tetanus have been performed according to the Clinical Protocol of the Institution. Methods Descriptive and retrospective study conducted in patients of both genders, > 18 years old admitted to a public hospital specialized in emergency and trauma, to treat primary open fracture. The data of interest were surveyed in medical records, drug prescriptions, report of patients admitted in the Surgical Block and tetanus prophylaxis requests. Results A total of 241 patients were selected, mostly male (81.7%), young adults (64.3%), victims of motorcycle accidents (53.5%). Infectious complications were present in 18.7% of the fractures, the mean time for the surgical approach was 4 hours and 12 minutes, and 91.7% of the patients had preoperative antimicrobial prescription. The main inadequacies identified were: period of prescription of antimicrobial treatment (63.5%); choice of the antimicrobial scheme (59.3%) and antimicrobial dose (58.0%). Only 14.1% of the patients were immunized against tetanus. Conclusion The greatest divergences with the Clinical Protocol were observed in the issues involving the antimicrobial regimen used, doses and time of prescription, as well as in tetanus prophylaxis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7316547 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Published by Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73165472020-07-01 Clínical Audit of Primary Treatment of Open Fractures: Antibiotic Treatment and Tetanus Prophylaxis Assunção, Adriana Lúcia Ferris de Oliveira de, Sílvia Teodoro Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) Objective To evaluate whether the conducts involving antimicrobial treatment and prophylaxis against tetanus have been performed according to the Clinical Protocol of the Institution. Methods Descriptive and retrospective study conducted in patients of both genders, > 18 years old admitted to a public hospital specialized in emergency and trauma, to treat primary open fracture. The data of interest were surveyed in medical records, drug prescriptions, report of patients admitted in the Surgical Block and tetanus prophylaxis requests. Results A total of 241 patients were selected, mostly male (81.7%), young adults (64.3%), victims of motorcycle accidents (53.5%). Infectious complications were present in 18.7% of the fractures, the mean time for the surgical approach was 4 hours and 12 minutes, and 91.7% of the patients had preoperative antimicrobial prescription. The main inadequacies identified were: period of prescription of antimicrobial treatment (63.5%); choice of the antimicrobial scheme (59.3%) and antimicrobial dose (58.0%). Only 14.1% of the patients were immunized against tetanus. Conclusion The greatest divergences with the Clinical Protocol were observed in the issues involving the antimicrobial regimen used, doses and time of prescription, as well as in tetanus prophylaxis. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Published by Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda 2020-06 2020-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7316547/ /pubmed/32616972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-3402470 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Assunção, Adriana Lúcia Ferris de Oliveira de, Sílvia Teodoro Clínical Audit of Primary Treatment of Open Fractures: Antibiotic Treatment and Tetanus Prophylaxis |
title |
Clínical Audit of Primary Treatment of Open Fractures: Antibiotic Treatment and Tetanus Prophylaxis
|
title_full |
Clínical Audit of Primary Treatment of Open Fractures: Antibiotic Treatment and Tetanus Prophylaxis
|
title_fullStr |
Clínical Audit of Primary Treatment of Open Fractures: Antibiotic Treatment and Tetanus Prophylaxis
|
title_full_unstemmed |
Clínical Audit of Primary Treatment of Open Fractures: Antibiotic Treatment and Tetanus Prophylaxis
|
title_short |
Clínical Audit of Primary Treatment of Open Fractures: Antibiotic Treatment and Tetanus Prophylaxis
|
title_sort | clínical audit of primary treatment of open fractures: antibiotic treatment and tetanus prophylaxis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7316547/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32616972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-3402470 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT assuncaoadrianaluciaferrisde clinicalauditofprimarytreatmentofopenfracturesantibiotictreatmentandtetanusprophylaxis AT oliveiradesilviateodoro clinicalauditofprimarytreatmentofopenfracturesantibiotictreatmentandtetanusprophylaxis |