Cargando…

Clínical Audit of Primary Treatment of Open Fractures: Antibiotic Treatment and Tetanus Prophylaxis

Objective  To evaluate whether the conducts involving antimicrobial treatment and prophylaxis against tetanus have been performed according to the Clinical Protocol of the Institution. Methods  Descriptive and retrospective study conducted in patients of both genders, > 18 years old admitted to a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Assunção, Adriana Lúcia Ferris de, Oliveira de, Sílvia Teodoro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Published by Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda 2020
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7316547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32616972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-3402470
_version_ 1783550454709354496
author Assunção, Adriana Lúcia Ferris de
Oliveira de, Sílvia Teodoro
author_facet Assunção, Adriana Lúcia Ferris de
Oliveira de, Sílvia Teodoro
author_sort Assunção, Adriana Lúcia Ferris de
collection PubMed
description Objective  To evaluate whether the conducts involving antimicrobial treatment and prophylaxis against tetanus have been performed according to the Clinical Protocol of the Institution. Methods  Descriptive and retrospective study conducted in patients of both genders, > 18 years old admitted to a public hospital specialized in emergency and trauma, to treat primary open fracture. The data of interest were surveyed in medical records, drug prescriptions, report of patients admitted in the Surgical Block and tetanus prophylaxis requests. Results  A total of 241 patients were selected, mostly male (81.7%), young adults (64.3%), victims of motorcycle accidents (53.5%). Infectious complications were present in 18.7% of the fractures, the mean time for the surgical approach was 4 hours and 12 minutes, and 91.7% of the patients had preoperative antimicrobial prescription. The main inadequacies identified were: period of prescription of antimicrobial treatment (63.5%); choice of the antimicrobial scheme (59.3%) and antimicrobial dose (58.0%). Only 14.1% of the patients were immunized against tetanus. Conclusion  The greatest divergences with the Clinical Protocol were observed in the issues involving the antimicrobial regimen used, doses and time of prescription, as well as in tetanus prophylaxis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7316547
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Published by Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73165472020-07-01 Clínical Audit of Primary Treatment of Open Fractures: Antibiotic Treatment and Tetanus Prophylaxis Assunção, Adriana Lúcia Ferris de Oliveira de, Sílvia Teodoro Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) Objective  To evaluate whether the conducts involving antimicrobial treatment and prophylaxis against tetanus have been performed according to the Clinical Protocol of the Institution. Methods  Descriptive and retrospective study conducted in patients of both genders, > 18 years old admitted to a public hospital specialized in emergency and trauma, to treat primary open fracture. The data of interest were surveyed in medical records, drug prescriptions, report of patients admitted in the Surgical Block and tetanus prophylaxis requests. Results  A total of 241 patients were selected, mostly male (81.7%), young adults (64.3%), victims of motorcycle accidents (53.5%). Infectious complications were present in 18.7% of the fractures, the mean time for the surgical approach was 4 hours and 12 minutes, and 91.7% of the patients had preoperative antimicrobial prescription. The main inadequacies identified were: period of prescription of antimicrobial treatment (63.5%); choice of the antimicrobial scheme (59.3%) and antimicrobial dose (58.0%). Only 14.1% of the patients were immunized against tetanus. Conclusion  The greatest divergences with the Clinical Protocol were observed in the issues involving the antimicrobial regimen used, doses and time of prescription, as well as in tetanus prophylaxis. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Published by Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda 2020-06 2020-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7316547/ /pubmed/32616972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-3402470 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Assunção, Adriana Lúcia Ferris de
Oliveira de, Sílvia Teodoro
Clínical Audit of Primary Treatment of Open Fractures: Antibiotic Treatment and Tetanus Prophylaxis
title Clínical Audit of Primary Treatment of Open Fractures: Antibiotic Treatment and Tetanus Prophylaxis
title_full Clínical Audit of Primary Treatment of Open Fractures: Antibiotic Treatment and Tetanus Prophylaxis
title_fullStr Clínical Audit of Primary Treatment of Open Fractures: Antibiotic Treatment and Tetanus Prophylaxis
title_full_unstemmed Clínical Audit of Primary Treatment of Open Fractures: Antibiotic Treatment and Tetanus Prophylaxis
title_short Clínical Audit of Primary Treatment of Open Fractures: Antibiotic Treatment and Tetanus Prophylaxis
title_sort clínical audit of primary treatment of open fractures: antibiotic treatment and tetanus prophylaxis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7316547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32616972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-3402470
work_keys_str_mv AT assuncaoadrianaluciaferrisde clinicalauditofprimarytreatmentofopenfracturesantibiotictreatmentandtetanusprophylaxis
AT oliveiradesilviateodoro clinicalauditofprimarytreatmentofopenfracturesantibiotictreatmentandtetanusprophylaxis