Cargando…
Resistance exercise and breast cancer–related lymphedema—a systematic review update and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this systematic review update and meta-analysis was to analyze resistance exercise (RE) intervention trials in breast cancer survivors (BCS) regarding their effect on breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) status and upper and lower extremity strength. METHODS: Systematic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7316683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32415386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05521-x |
_version_ | 1783550470780878848 |
---|---|
author | Hasenoehrl, Timothy Palma, Stefano Ramazanova, Dariga Kölbl, Heinz Dorner, Thomas E. Keilani, Mohammad Crevenna, Richard |
author_facet | Hasenoehrl, Timothy Palma, Stefano Ramazanova, Dariga Kölbl, Heinz Dorner, Thomas E. Keilani, Mohammad Crevenna, Richard |
author_sort | Hasenoehrl, Timothy |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The purpose of this systematic review update and meta-analysis was to analyze resistance exercise (RE) intervention trials in breast cancer survivors (BCS) regarding their effect on breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) status and upper and lower extremity strength. METHODS: Systematic literature search was conducted utilizing PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases. Any exercise intervention studies—both randomized controlled and uncontrolled—which assessed the effects of RE on BCRL in BCS in at least one intervention group published between 1966 and 31st January 2020 were included. Included articles were analyzed regarding their level of evidence and their methodological quality using respective tools for randomized and nonrandomized trials of the Cochrane collaboration. Meta-analysis for bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) values as well as upper and lower extremity strength was conducted. RESULTS: Altogether, 29 studies were included in the systematic review. Results of six studies with altogether twelve RE intervention groups could be pooled for meta-analysis of the BCRL. A significant reduction of BCRL after RE was seen in BIS values (95% CI − 1.10 [− 2.19, − 0.01] L-Dex score). Furthermore, strength results of six studies could be pooled and meta-analysis showed significant improvements of muscular strength in the upper and lower extremities (95% CI 8.96 [3.42, 14.51] kg and 95% CI 23.42 [11.95, 34.88] kg, respectively). CONCLUSION: RE does not have a systematic negative effect on BCRL and, on the contrary, potentially decreases it. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00520-020-05521-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7316683 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73166832020-07-01 Resistance exercise and breast cancer–related lymphedema—a systematic review update and meta-analysis Hasenoehrl, Timothy Palma, Stefano Ramazanova, Dariga Kölbl, Heinz Dorner, Thomas E. Keilani, Mohammad Crevenna, Richard Support Care Cancer Review Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this systematic review update and meta-analysis was to analyze resistance exercise (RE) intervention trials in breast cancer survivors (BCS) regarding their effect on breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) status and upper and lower extremity strength. METHODS: Systematic literature search was conducted utilizing PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases. Any exercise intervention studies—both randomized controlled and uncontrolled—which assessed the effects of RE on BCRL in BCS in at least one intervention group published between 1966 and 31st January 2020 were included. Included articles were analyzed regarding their level of evidence and their methodological quality using respective tools for randomized and nonrandomized trials of the Cochrane collaboration. Meta-analysis for bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) values as well as upper and lower extremity strength was conducted. RESULTS: Altogether, 29 studies were included in the systematic review. Results of six studies with altogether twelve RE intervention groups could be pooled for meta-analysis of the BCRL. A significant reduction of BCRL after RE was seen in BIS values (95% CI − 1.10 [− 2.19, − 0.01] L-Dex score). Furthermore, strength results of six studies could be pooled and meta-analysis showed significant improvements of muscular strength in the upper and lower extremities (95% CI 8.96 [3.42, 14.51] kg and 95% CI 23.42 [11.95, 34.88] kg, respectively). CONCLUSION: RE does not have a systematic negative effect on BCRL and, on the contrary, potentially decreases it. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00520-020-05521-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-05-15 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7316683/ /pubmed/32415386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05521-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Hasenoehrl, Timothy Palma, Stefano Ramazanova, Dariga Kölbl, Heinz Dorner, Thomas E. Keilani, Mohammad Crevenna, Richard Resistance exercise and breast cancer–related lymphedema—a systematic review update and meta-analysis |
title | Resistance exercise and breast cancer–related lymphedema—a systematic review update and meta-analysis |
title_full | Resistance exercise and breast cancer–related lymphedema—a systematic review update and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Resistance exercise and breast cancer–related lymphedema—a systematic review update and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Resistance exercise and breast cancer–related lymphedema—a systematic review update and meta-analysis |
title_short | Resistance exercise and breast cancer–related lymphedema—a systematic review update and meta-analysis |
title_sort | resistance exercise and breast cancer–related lymphedema—a systematic review update and meta-analysis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7316683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32415386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05521-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hasenoehrltimothy resistanceexerciseandbreastcancerrelatedlymphedemaasystematicreviewupdateandmetaanalysis AT palmastefano resistanceexerciseandbreastcancerrelatedlymphedemaasystematicreviewupdateandmetaanalysis AT ramazanovadariga resistanceexerciseandbreastcancerrelatedlymphedemaasystematicreviewupdateandmetaanalysis AT kolblheinz resistanceexerciseandbreastcancerrelatedlymphedemaasystematicreviewupdateandmetaanalysis AT dornerthomase resistanceexerciseandbreastcancerrelatedlymphedemaasystematicreviewupdateandmetaanalysis AT keilanimohammad resistanceexerciseandbreastcancerrelatedlymphedemaasystematicreviewupdateandmetaanalysis AT crevennarichard resistanceexerciseandbreastcancerrelatedlymphedemaasystematicreviewupdateandmetaanalysis |