Cargando…

Resistance exercise and breast cancer–related lymphedema—a systematic review update and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this systematic review update and meta-analysis was to analyze resistance exercise (RE) intervention trials in breast cancer survivors (BCS) regarding their effect on breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) status and upper and lower extremity strength. METHODS: Systematic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hasenoehrl, Timothy, Palma, Stefano, Ramazanova, Dariga, Kölbl, Heinz, Dorner, Thomas E., Keilani, Mohammad, Crevenna, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7316683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32415386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05521-x
_version_ 1783550470780878848
author Hasenoehrl, Timothy
Palma, Stefano
Ramazanova, Dariga
Kölbl, Heinz
Dorner, Thomas E.
Keilani, Mohammad
Crevenna, Richard
author_facet Hasenoehrl, Timothy
Palma, Stefano
Ramazanova, Dariga
Kölbl, Heinz
Dorner, Thomas E.
Keilani, Mohammad
Crevenna, Richard
author_sort Hasenoehrl, Timothy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this systematic review update and meta-analysis was to analyze resistance exercise (RE) intervention trials in breast cancer survivors (BCS) regarding their effect on breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) status and upper and lower extremity strength. METHODS: Systematic literature search was conducted utilizing PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases. Any exercise intervention studies—both randomized controlled and uncontrolled—which assessed the effects of RE on BCRL in BCS in at least one intervention group published between 1966 and 31st January 2020 were included. Included articles were analyzed regarding their level of evidence and their methodological quality using respective tools for randomized and nonrandomized trials of the Cochrane collaboration. Meta-analysis for bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) values as well as upper and lower extremity strength was conducted. RESULTS: Altogether, 29 studies were included in the systematic review. Results of six studies with altogether twelve RE intervention groups could be pooled for meta-analysis of the BCRL. A significant reduction of BCRL after RE was seen in BIS values (95% CI − 1.10 [− 2.19, − 0.01] L-Dex score). Furthermore, strength results of six studies could be pooled and meta-analysis showed significant improvements of muscular strength in the upper and lower extremities (95% CI 8.96 [3.42, 14.51] kg and 95% CI 23.42 [11.95, 34.88] kg, respectively). CONCLUSION: RE does not have a systematic negative effect on BCRL and, on the contrary, potentially decreases it. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00520-020-05521-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7316683
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73166832020-07-01 Resistance exercise and breast cancer–related lymphedema—a systematic review update and meta-analysis Hasenoehrl, Timothy Palma, Stefano Ramazanova, Dariga Kölbl, Heinz Dorner, Thomas E. Keilani, Mohammad Crevenna, Richard Support Care Cancer Review Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this systematic review update and meta-analysis was to analyze resistance exercise (RE) intervention trials in breast cancer survivors (BCS) regarding their effect on breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) status and upper and lower extremity strength. METHODS: Systematic literature search was conducted utilizing PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases. Any exercise intervention studies—both randomized controlled and uncontrolled—which assessed the effects of RE on BCRL in BCS in at least one intervention group published between 1966 and 31st January 2020 were included. Included articles were analyzed regarding their level of evidence and their methodological quality using respective tools for randomized and nonrandomized trials of the Cochrane collaboration. Meta-analysis for bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) values as well as upper and lower extremity strength was conducted. RESULTS: Altogether, 29 studies were included in the systematic review. Results of six studies with altogether twelve RE intervention groups could be pooled for meta-analysis of the BCRL. A significant reduction of BCRL after RE was seen in BIS values (95% CI − 1.10 [− 2.19, − 0.01] L-Dex score). Furthermore, strength results of six studies could be pooled and meta-analysis showed significant improvements of muscular strength in the upper and lower extremities (95% CI 8.96 [3.42, 14.51] kg and 95% CI 23.42 [11.95, 34.88] kg, respectively). CONCLUSION: RE does not have a systematic negative effect on BCRL and, on the contrary, potentially decreases it. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00520-020-05521-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-05-15 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7316683/ /pubmed/32415386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05521-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review Article
Hasenoehrl, Timothy
Palma, Stefano
Ramazanova, Dariga
Kölbl, Heinz
Dorner, Thomas E.
Keilani, Mohammad
Crevenna, Richard
Resistance exercise and breast cancer–related lymphedema—a systematic review update and meta-analysis
title Resistance exercise and breast cancer–related lymphedema—a systematic review update and meta-analysis
title_full Resistance exercise and breast cancer–related lymphedema—a systematic review update and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Resistance exercise and breast cancer–related lymphedema—a systematic review update and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Resistance exercise and breast cancer–related lymphedema—a systematic review update and meta-analysis
title_short Resistance exercise and breast cancer–related lymphedema—a systematic review update and meta-analysis
title_sort resistance exercise and breast cancer–related lymphedema—a systematic review update and meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7316683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32415386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05521-x
work_keys_str_mv AT hasenoehrltimothy resistanceexerciseandbreastcancerrelatedlymphedemaasystematicreviewupdateandmetaanalysis
AT palmastefano resistanceexerciseandbreastcancerrelatedlymphedemaasystematicreviewupdateandmetaanalysis
AT ramazanovadariga resistanceexerciseandbreastcancerrelatedlymphedemaasystematicreviewupdateandmetaanalysis
AT kolblheinz resistanceexerciseandbreastcancerrelatedlymphedemaasystematicreviewupdateandmetaanalysis
AT dornerthomase resistanceexerciseandbreastcancerrelatedlymphedemaasystematicreviewupdateandmetaanalysis
AT keilanimohammad resistanceexerciseandbreastcancerrelatedlymphedemaasystematicreviewupdateandmetaanalysis
AT crevennarichard resistanceexerciseandbreastcancerrelatedlymphedemaasystematicreviewupdateandmetaanalysis