Cargando…

Economic evaluation of passive monitoring technology for seniors

BACKGROUND: Advances such as passive monitoring technology (PMT), which provides holistic supervision of chronically ill and elderly patients, enable and support improved monitoring and observation, thus empowering the growing population of older adults to live more independently while lowering heal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schneider, John E., Cooper, Jacie, Scheibling, Cara, Parikh, Anjani
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7316690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31522390
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40520-019-01323-2
_version_ 1783550472460697600
author Schneider, John E.
Cooper, Jacie
Scheibling, Cara
Parikh, Anjani
author_facet Schneider, John E.
Cooper, Jacie
Scheibling, Cara
Parikh, Anjani
author_sort Schneider, John E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Advances such as passive monitoring technology (PMT), which provides holistic supervision of chronically ill and elderly patients, enable and support improved monitoring and observation, thus empowering the growing population of older adults to live more independently while lowering health care expenses. AIMS: This study develops a conceptual model to estimate the potential savings associated with PMT. METHODS: We first develop a conceptual model to identify the main cost variables associated with independent living, focusing on three pathways: (1) PMT, (2) independent living supported by the current standard of care, and (3) facility-based care. We examined the impact on three outcomes [i.e., health care costs, institutional costs, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL)] along each of the three care pathways (i.e., PMT, independent living supported by the standard of care, and facility-based care) and developed a cost-benefit model to calculate the net costs and benefits associated with each care pathway. RESULTS: The cost–benefit model showed savings between approximately $425 per-member per-month (PMPM) for those using PMT compared to those on the standard of care pathway. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that a 5% increase in nursing home utilization generates cost savings of more than 30% PMPM. DISCUSSION: The total projected cost savings for individuals on the PMT arm are projected to be more than $425 PMPM, with annual savings of $5069 per-person per-year, and over $5.1 million for a target population of 1000 individuals. CONCLUSIONS: The cost calculations in our cost–benefit simulation model clearly demonstrate the value of PMT and show the potential value to payers and integrated delivery systems in offering PMT to individuals who are likely to benefit the most from the services. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40520-019-01323-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7316690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73166902020-07-01 Economic evaluation of passive monitoring technology for seniors Schneider, John E. Cooper, Jacie Scheibling, Cara Parikh, Anjani Aging Clin Exp Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Advances such as passive monitoring technology (PMT), which provides holistic supervision of chronically ill and elderly patients, enable and support improved monitoring and observation, thus empowering the growing population of older adults to live more independently while lowering health care expenses. AIMS: This study develops a conceptual model to estimate the potential savings associated with PMT. METHODS: We first develop a conceptual model to identify the main cost variables associated with independent living, focusing on three pathways: (1) PMT, (2) independent living supported by the current standard of care, and (3) facility-based care. We examined the impact on three outcomes [i.e., health care costs, institutional costs, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL)] along each of the three care pathways (i.e., PMT, independent living supported by the standard of care, and facility-based care) and developed a cost-benefit model to calculate the net costs and benefits associated with each care pathway. RESULTS: The cost–benefit model showed savings between approximately $425 per-member per-month (PMPM) for those using PMT compared to those on the standard of care pathway. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that a 5% increase in nursing home utilization generates cost savings of more than 30% PMPM. DISCUSSION: The total projected cost savings for individuals on the PMT arm are projected to be more than $425 PMPM, with annual savings of $5069 per-person per-year, and over $5.1 million for a target population of 1000 individuals. CONCLUSIONS: The cost calculations in our cost–benefit simulation model clearly demonstrate the value of PMT and show the potential value to payers and integrated delivery systems in offering PMT to individuals who are likely to benefit the most from the services. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40520-019-01323-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-09-14 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7316690/ /pubmed/31522390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40520-019-01323-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Schneider, John E.
Cooper, Jacie
Scheibling, Cara
Parikh, Anjani
Economic evaluation of passive monitoring technology for seniors
title Economic evaluation of passive monitoring technology for seniors
title_full Economic evaluation of passive monitoring technology for seniors
title_fullStr Economic evaluation of passive monitoring technology for seniors
title_full_unstemmed Economic evaluation of passive monitoring technology for seniors
title_short Economic evaluation of passive monitoring technology for seniors
title_sort economic evaluation of passive monitoring technology for seniors
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7316690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31522390
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40520-019-01323-2
work_keys_str_mv AT schneiderjohne economicevaluationofpassivemonitoringtechnologyforseniors
AT cooperjacie economicevaluationofpassivemonitoringtechnologyforseniors
AT scheiblingcara economicevaluationofpassivemonitoringtechnologyforseniors
AT parikhanjani economicevaluationofpassivemonitoringtechnologyforseniors