Cargando…

Quality of care evaluation in non-functioning pituitary adenoma with chiasm compression: visual outcomes and timing of intervention clinical recommendations based on a systematic literature review and cohort study

PURPOSE: Surgery in patients with non-functioning pituitary macroadenomas (NFMA) is effective in ameliorating visual function. The urgency for decompression, and preferred timing of surgery related to the preoperative severity of dysfunction is unknown. METHODS: Systematic review for evidence to pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pelsma, Iris C. M., Verstegen, Marco J. T., de Vries, Friso, Notting, Irene C., Broekman, Marike L. D., van Furth, Wouter R., Biermasz, Nienke R., Pereira, Alberto M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7316692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32419072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11102-020-01044-0
_version_ 1783550472968208384
author Pelsma, Iris C. M.
Verstegen, Marco J. T.
de Vries, Friso
Notting, Irene C.
Broekman, Marike L. D.
van Furth, Wouter R.
Biermasz, Nienke R.
Pereira, Alberto M.
author_facet Pelsma, Iris C. M.
Verstegen, Marco J. T.
de Vries, Friso
Notting, Irene C.
Broekman, Marike L. D.
van Furth, Wouter R.
Biermasz, Nienke R.
Pereira, Alberto M.
author_sort Pelsma, Iris C. M.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Surgery in patients with non-functioning pituitary macroadenomas (NFMA) is effective in ameliorating visual function. The urgency for decompression, and preferred timing of surgery related to the preoperative severity of dysfunction is unknown. METHODS: Systematic review for evidence to provide clinical guidance for timing of surgical decompression of the optic chiasm, and a cohort study of 30 NFMA patients, in whom mean deviation (MD), and severity of visual dysfunction was assessed. RESULTS: Systematic review 44 studies were included with a total of 4789 patients. Postoperatively, visual field defects improved in 87.0% of patients, stabilized in 12.8% and worsened in 1.0%. Specific protocols regarding timing of surgery were not reported. Only seven studies (16.7%) reported on either the duration of visual symptoms, or diagnostic, or treatment delay. Cohort study 30 NFMA patients (50% female, 60 eyes, mean age 58.5 ± 14.8 years), had a median MD of − 5.3 decibel (IQR − 3.1 to − 10.1). MD was strongly correlated with clinical severity (r =  − 0.94, P < 0.0001), and were used for severity of defects cut-off values: (1) normal >  − 2 dB, (2) mild − 2 dB to − 4 dB, (3) moderate − 4 to − 8 dB, (4) severe − 8 to − 17 dB, (5) very severe <  − 17 dB. CONCLUSION: Surgical decompression is highly effective in improving visual function. Uniform, quantitative grading of visual dysfunction was lacking. MD is a promising quantitative outcome measure. We provide recommendations for the evaluation of timing of surgery, considering severity of visual impairment, which will need further validation based on expert clinical practice. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11102-020-01044-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7316692
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73166922020-07-01 Quality of care evaluation in non-functioning pituitary adenoma with chiasm compression: visual outcomes and timing of intervention clinical recommendations based on a systematic literature review and cohort study Pelsma, Iris C. M. Verstegen, Marco J. T. de Vries, Friso Notting, Irene C. Broekman, Marike L. D. van Furth, Wouter R. Biermasz, Nienke R. Pereira, Alberto M. Pituitary Article PURPOSE: Surgery in patients with non-functioning pituitary macroadenomas (NFMA) is effective in ameliorating visual function. The urgency for decompression, and preferred timing of surgery related to the preoperative severity of dysfunction is unknown. METHODS: Systematic review for evidence to provide clinical guidance for timing of surgical decompression of the optic chiasm, and a cohort study of 30 NFMA patients, in whom mean deviation (MD), and severity of visual dysfunction was assessed. RESULTS: Systematic review 44 studies were included with a total of 4789 patients. Postoperatively, visual field defects improved in 87.0% of patients, stabilized in 12.8% and worsened in 1.0%. Specific protocols regarding timing of surgery were not reported. Only seven studies (16.7%) reported on either the duration of visual symptoms, or diagnostic, or treatment delay. Cohort study 30 NFMA patients (50% female, 60 eyes, mean age 58.5 ± 14.8 years), had a median MD of − 5.3 decibel (IQR − 3.1 to − 10.1). MD was strongly correlated with clinical severity (r =  − 0.94, P < 0.0001), and were used for severity of defects cut-off values: (1) normal >  − 2 dB, (2) mild − 2 dB to − 4 dB, (3) moderate − 4 to − 8 dB, (4) severe − 8 to − 17 dB, (5) very severe <  − 17 dB. CONCLUSION: Surgical decompression is highly effective in improving visual function. Uniform, quantitative grading of visual dysfunction was lacking. MD is a promising quantitative outcome measure. We provide recommendations for the evaluation of timing of surgery, considering severity of visual impairment, which will need further validation based on expert clinical practice. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11102-020-01044-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-05-18 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7316692/ /pubmed/32419072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11102-020-01044-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Pelsma, Iris C. M.
Verstegen, Marco J. T.
de Vries, Friso
Notting, Irene C.
Broekman, Marike L. D.
van Furth, Wouter R.
Biermasz, Nienke R.
Pereira, Alberto M.
Quality of care evaluation in non-functioning pituitary adenoma with chiasm compression: visual outcomes and timing of intervention clinical recommendations based on a systematic literature review and cohort study
title Quality of care evaluation in non-functioning pituitary adenoma with chiasm compression: visual outcomes and timing of intervention clinical recommendations based on a systematic literature review and cohort study
title_full Quality of care evaluation in non-functioning pituitary adenoma with chiasm compression: visual outcomes and timing of intervention clinical recommendations based on a systematic literature review and cohort study
title_fullStr Quality of care evaluation in non-functioning pituitary adenoma with chiasm compression: visual outcomes and timing of intervention clinical recommendations based on a systematic literature review and cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Quality of care evaluation in non-functioning pituitary adenoma with chiasm compression: visual outcomes and timing of intervention clinical recommendations based on a systematic literature review and cohort study
title_short Quality of care evaluation in non-functioning pituitary adenoma with chiasm compression: visual outcomes and timing of intervention clinical recommendations based on a systematic literature review and cohort study
title_sort quality of care evaluation in non-functioning pituitary adenoma with chiasm compression: visual outcomes and timing of intervention clinical recommendations based on a systematic literature review and cohort study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7316692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32419072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11102-020-01044-0
work_keys_str_mv AT pelsmairiscm qualityofcareevaluationinnonfunctioningpituitaryadenomawithchiasmcompressionvisualoutcomesandtimingofinterventionclinicalrecommendationsbasedonasystematicliteraturereviewandcohortstudy
AT verstegenmarcojt qualityofcareevaluationinnonfunctioningpituitaryadenomawithchiasmcompressionvisualoutcomesandtimingofinterventionclinicalrecommendationsbasedonasystematicliteraturereviewandcohortstudy
AT devriesfriso qualityofcareevaluationinnonfunctioningpituitaryadenomawithchiasmcompressionvisualoutcomesandtimingofinterventionclinicalrecommendationsbasedonasystematicliteraturereviewandcohortstudy
AT nottingirenec qualityofcareevaluationinnonfunctioningpituitaryadenomawithchiasmcompressionvisualoutcomesandtimingofinterventionclinicalrecommendationsbasedonasystematicliteraturereviewandcohortstudy
AT broekmanmarikeld qualityofcareevaluationinnonfunctioningpituitaryadenomawithchiasmcompressionvisualoutcomesandtimingofinterventionclinicalrecommendationsbasedonasystematicliteraturereviewandcohortstudy
AT vanfurthwouterr qualityofcareevaluationinnonfunctioningpituitaryadenomawithchiasmcompressionvisualoutcomesandtimingofinterventionclinicalrecommendationsbasedonasystematicliteraturereviewandcohortstudy
AT biermasznienker qualityofcareevaluationinnonfunctioningpituitaryadenomawithchiasmcompressionvisualoutcomesandtimingofinterventionclinicalrecommendationsbasedonasystematicliteraturereviewandcohortstudy
AT pereiraalbertom qualityofcareevaluationinnonfunctioningpituitaryadenomawithchiasmcompressionvisualoutcomesandtimingofinterventionclinicalrecommendationsbasedonasystematicliteraturereviewandcohortstudy