Cargando…

Impact failure in two silicates revealed by ultrafast, in situ, synchrotron X-ray microscopy

To travel safely behind screens that can protect us from stones and hail, we must understand the response of glass to impact. However, without a means to observe the mechanisms that fail different silicate architectures, engineering has relied on external sensors, post-impact examination and best-gu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bourne, N. K., Mirihanage, W. U., Olbinado, M. P., Rack, A., Rau, C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7316810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32587288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67086-3
_version_ 1783550500697800704
author Bourne, N. K.
Mirihanage, W. U.
Olbinado, M. P.
Rack, A.
Rau, C.
author_facet Bourne, N. K.
Mirihanage, W. U.
Olbinado, M. P.
Rack, A.
Rau, C.
author_sort Bourne, N. K.
collection PubMed
description To travel safely behind screens that can protect us from stones and hail, we must understand the response of glass to impact. However, without a means to observe the mechanisms that fail different silicate architectures, engineering has relied on external sensors, post-impact examination and best-guess to glaze our vehicles. We have used single and multi-bunch, X-ray imaging to differentiate distinct phases of failure in two silicates. We identified distinct micromechanisms, operating in tandem and leading to failure in borosilicate glass and Z-cut quartz. A surface zone in the amorphous glass densifies before bulk fracture occurs and then fails the block, whilst in quartz, fast cracks, driven down cleavage planes, fails the bulk. Varying the rate at which ejecta escapes by using different indenter tip geometries controls the failed target’s bulk strength. This opens the way to more physically based constitutive descriptions for the glasses allowing design of safer, composite panels by controlling the impulses felt by protective screens.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7316810
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73168102020-06-26 Impact failure in two silicates revealed by ultrafast, in situ, synchrotron X-ray microscopy Bourne, N. K. Mirihanage, W. U. Olbinado, M. P. Rack, A. Rau, C. Sci Rep Article To travel safely behind screens that can protect us from stones and hail, we must understand the response of glass to impact. However, without a means to observe the mechanisms that fail different silicate architectures, engineering has relied on external sensors, post-impact examination and best-guess to glaze our vehicles. We have used single and multi-bunch, X-ray imaging to differentiate distinct phases of failure in two silicates. We identified distinct micromechanisms, operating in tandem and leading to failure in borosilicate glass and Z-cut quartz. A surface zone in the amorphous glass densifies before bulk fracture occurs and then fails the block, whilst in quartz, fast cracks, driven down cleavage planes, fails the bulk. Varying the rate at which ejecta escapes by using different indenter tip geometries controls the failed target’s bulk strength. This opens the way to more physically based constitutive descriptions for the glasses allowing design of safer, composite panels by controlling the impulses felt by protective screens. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7316810/ /pubmed/32587288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67086-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Bourne, N. K.
Mirihanage, W. U.
Olbinado, M. P.
Rack, A.
Rau, C.
Impact failure in two silicates revealed by ultrafast, in situ, synchrotron X-ray microscopy
title Impact failure in two silicates revealed by ultrafast, in situ, synchrotron X-ray microscopy
title_full Impact failure in two silicates revealed by ultrafast, in situ, synchrotron X-ray microscopy
title_fullStr Impact failure in two silicates revealed by ultrafast, in situ, synchrotron X-ray microscopy
title_full_unstemmed Impact failure in two silicates revealed by ultrafast, in situ, synchrotron X-ray microscopy
title_short Impact failure in two silicates revealed by ultrafast, in situ, synchrotron X-ray microscopy
title_sort impact failure in two silicates revealed by ultrafast, in situ, synchrotron x-ray microscopy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7316810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32587288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67086-3
work_keys_str_mv AT bournenk impactfailureintwosilicatesrevealedbyultrafastinsitusynchrotronxraymicroscopy
AT mirihanagewu impactfailureintwosilicatesrevealedbyultrafastinsitusynchrotronxraymicroscopy
AT olbinadomp impactfailureintwosilicatesrevealedbyultrafastinsitusynchrotronxraymicroscopy
AT racka impactfailureintwosilicatesrevealedbyultrafastinsitusynchrotronxraymicroscopy
AT rauc impactfailureintwosilicatesrevealedbyultrafastinsitusynchrotronxraymicroscopy