Cargando…

PrEP Interest Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in the Netherlands: Covariates and Differences Across Samples

Despite increased availability of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), PrEP uptake has remained low. To promote uptake, factors related to PrEP interest among relevant target populations warrant investigation. The aim of this study was to provide an analysis of PrEP interest among men who have sex with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Dijk, Mart, Duken, Sascha B., Delabre, Rosemary M., Stranz, Richard, Schlegel, Vincent, Rojas Castro, Daniela, Bernier, Adeline, Zantkuijl, Paul, Ruiter, Robert A. C., de Wit, John B. F., Jonas, Kai J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7316842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32124118
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01620-x
_version_ 1783550507536613376
author van Dijk, Mart
Duken, Sascha B.
Delabre, Rosemary M.
Stranz, Richard
Schlegel, Vincent
Rojas Castro, Daniela
Bernier, Adeline
Zantkuijl, Paul
Ruiter, Robert A. C.
de Wit, John B. F.
Jonas, Kai J.
author_facet van Dijk, Mart
Duken, Sascha B.
Delabre, Rosemary M.
Stranz, Richard
Schlegel, Vincent
Rojas Castro, Daniela
Bernier, Adeline
Zantkuijl, Paul
Ruiter, Robert A. C.
de Wit, John B. F.
Jonas, Kai J.
author_sort van Dijk, Mart
collection PubMed
description Despite increased availability of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), PrEP uptake has remained low. To promote uptake, factors related to PrEP interest among relevant target populations warrant investigation. The aim of this study was to provide an analysis of PrEP interest among men who have sex with men (MSM) in the Netherlands, while taking study recruitment strategies into account. We recruited 154 MSM from an LGBT research panel (AmsterdamPinkPanel) and 272 MSM from convenience sampling. Both samples were part of the Flash! PrEP in Europe Survey and were compared on their PrEP interest, usage intentions, and sexual behavior. We conducted logistic regression analyses to discover variables associated with PrEP interest and intentions. Participants from the AmsterdamPinkPanel were less likely to use PrEP, had less knowledge of PrEP, and were less interested in PrEP than participants from convenience sampling. Significant covariates of PrEP interest were being single, more prior PrEP knowledge, sexual risk behaviors, such as not having used a condom during last sex and having ever used drugs in a sexual context, and not participating in the AmsterdamPinkPanel. Adding the recruitment strategy to the regression increased explained variance on top of predictors already described in the literature. Increased sexual risk behavior is related to increased PrEP interest and it helps to identify PrEP target groups. Recruitment strategies have a substantial impact on findings regarding PrEP interest and usage intentions. This study emphasizes the importance of using multiple strategies for recruiting participants to obtain a more comprehensive view of MSM’s attitudes toward PrEP. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10508-019-01620-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7316842
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73168422020-07-01 PrEP Interest Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in the Netherlands: Covariates and Differences Across Samples van Dijk, Mart Duken, Sascha B. Delabre, Rosemary M. Stranz, Richard Schlegel, Vincent Rojas Castro, Daniela Bernier, Adeline Zantkuijl, Paul Ruiter, Robert A. C. de Wit, John B. F. Jonas, Kai J. Arch Sex Behav Original Paper Despite increased availability of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), PrEP uptake has remained low. To promote uptake, factors related to PrEP interest among relevant target populations warrant investigation. The aim of this study was to provide an analysis of PrEP interest among men who have sex with men (MSM) in the Netherlands, while taking study recruitment strategies into account. We recruited 154 MSM from an LGBT research panel (AmsterdamPinkPanel) and 272 MSM from convenience sampling. Both samples were part of the Flash! PrEP in Europe Survey and were compared on their PrEP interest, usage intentions, and sexual behavior. We conducted logistic regression analyses to discover variables associated with PrEP interest and intentions. Participants from the AmsterdamPinkPanel were less likely to use PrEP, had less knowledge of PrEP, and were less interested in PrEP than participants from convenience sampling. Significant covariates of PrEP interest were being single, more prior PrEP knowledge, sexual risk behaviors, such as not having used a condom during last sex and having ever used drugs in a sexual context, and not participating in the AmsterdamPinkPanel. Adding the recruitment strategy to the regression increased explained variance on top of predictors already described in the literature. Increased sexual risk behavior is related to increased PrEP interest and it helps to identify PrEP target groups. Recruitment strategies have a substantial impact on findings regarding PrEP interest and usage intentions. This study emphasizes the importance of using multiple strategies for recruiting participants to obtain a more comprehensive view of MSM’s attitudes toward PrEP. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10508-019-01620-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-03-02 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7316842/ /pubmed/32124118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01620-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Paper
van Dijk, Mart
Duken, Sascha B.
Delabre, Rosemary M.
Stranz, Richard
Schlegel, Vincent
Rojas Castro, Daniela
Bernier, Adeline
Zantkuijl, Paul
Ruiter, Robert A. C.
de Wit, John B. F.
Jonas, Kai J.
PrEP Interest Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in the Netherlands: Covariates and Differences Across Samples
title PrEP Interest Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in the Netherlands: Covariates and Differences Across Samples
title_full PrEP Interest Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in the Netherlands: Covariates and Differences Across Samples
title_fullStr PrEP Interest Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in the Netherlands: Covariates and Differences Across Samples
title_full_unstemmed PrEP Interest Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in the Netherlands: Covariates and Differences Across Samples
title_short PrEP Interest Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in the Netherlands: Covariates and Differences Across Samples
title_sort prep interest among men who have sex with men in the netherlands: covariates and differences across samples
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7316842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32124118
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01620-x
work_keys_str_mv AT vandijkmart prepinterestamongmenwhohavesexwithmeninthenetherlandscovariatesanddifferencesacrosssamples
AT dukensaschab prepinterestamongmenwhohavesexwithmeninthenetherlandscovariatesanddifferencesacrosssamples
AT delabrerosemarym prepinterestamongmenwhohavesexwithmeninthenetherlandscovariatesanddifferencesacrosssamples
AT stranzrichard prepinterestamongmenwhohavesexwithmeninthenetherlandscovariatesanddifferencesacrosssamples
AT schlegelvincent prepinterestamongmenwhohavesexwithmeninthenetherlandscovariatesanddifferencesacrosssamples
AT rojascastrodaniela prepinterestamongmenwhohavesexwithmeninthenetherlandscovariatesanddifferencesacrosssamples
AT bernieradeline prepinterestamongmenwhohavesexwithmeninthenetherlandscovariatesanddifferencesacrosssamples
AT zantkuijlpaul prepinterestamongmenwhohavesexwithmeninthenetherlandscovariatesanddifferencesacrosssamples
AT ruiterrobertac prepinterestamongmenwhohavesexwithmeninthenetherlandscovariatesanddifferencesacrosssamples
AT dewitjohnbf prepinterestamongmenwhohavesexwithmeninthenetherlandscovariatesanddifferencesacrosssamples
AT jonaskaij prepinterestamongmenwhohavesexwithmeninthenetherlandscovariatesanddifferencesacrosssamples