Cargando…
Read My Face: Automatic Facial Coding Versus Psychophysiological Indicators of Emotional Valence and Arousal
Facial expressions provide insight into a person’s emotional experience. To automatically decode these expressions has been made possible by tremendous progress in the field of computer vision. Researchers are now able to decode emotional facial expressions with impressive accuracy in standardized i...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7316962/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32636788 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01388 |
_version_ | 1783550524789882880 |
---|---|
author | Höfling, T. Tim A. Gerdes, Antje B. M. Föhl, Ulrich Alpers, Georg W. |
author_facet | Höfling, T. Tim A. Gerdes, Antje B. M. Föhl, Ulrich Alpers, Georg W. |
author_sort | Höfling, T. Tim A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Facial expressions provide insight into a person’s emotional experience. To automatically decode these expressions has been made possible by tremendous progress in the field of computer vision. Researchers are now able to decode emotional facial expressions with impressive accuracy in standardized images of prototypical basic emotions. We tested the sensitivity of a well-established automatic facial coding software program to detect spontaneous emotional reactions in individuals responding to emotional pictures. We compared automatically generated scores for valence and arousal of the Facereader (FR; Noldus Information Technology) with the current psychophysiological gold standard of measuring emotional valence (Facial Electromyography, EMG) and arousal (Skin Conductance, SC). We recorded physiological and behavioral measurements of 43 healthy participants while they looked at pleasant, unpleasant, or neutral scenes. When viewing pleasant pictures, FR Valence and EMG were both comparably sensitive. However, for unpleasant pictures, FR Valence showed an expected negative shift, but the signal differentiated not well between responses to neutral and unpleasant stimuli, that were distinguishable with EMG. Furthermore, FR Arousal values had a stronger correlation with self-reported valence than with arousal while SC was sensitive and specifically associated with self-reported arousal. This is the first study to systematically compare FR measurement of spontaneous emotional reactions to standardized emotional images with established psychophysiological measurement tools. This novel technology has yet to make strides to surpass the sensitivity of established psychophysiological measures. However, it provides a promising new measurement technique for non-contact assessment of emotional responses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7316962 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73169622020-07-06 Read My Face: Automatic Facial Coding Versus Psychophysiological Indicators of Emotional Valence and Arousal Höfling, T. Tim A. Gerdes, Antje B. M. Föhl, Ulrich Alpers, Georg W. Front Psychol Psychology Facial expressions provide insight into a person’s emotional experience. To automatically decode these expressions has been made possible by tremendous progress in the field of computer vision. Researchers are now able to decode emotional facial expressions with impressive accuracy in standardized images of prototypical basic emotions. We tested the sensitivity of a well-established automatic facial coding software program to detect spontaneous emotional reactions in individuals responding to emotional pictures. We compared automatically generated scores for valence and arousal of the Facereader (FR; Noldus Information Technology) with the current psychophysiological gold standard of measuring emotional valence (Facial Electromyography, EMG) and arousal (Skin Conductance, SC). We recorded physiological and behavioral measurements of 43 healthy participants while they looked at pleasant, unpleasant, or neutral scenes. When viewing pleasant pictures, FR Valence and EMG were both comparably sensitive. However, for unpleasant pictures, FR Valence showed an expected negative shift, but the signal differentiated not well between responses to neutral and unpleasant stimuli, that were distinguishable with EMG. Furthermore, FR Arousal values had a stronger correlation with self-reported valence than with arousal while SC was sensitive and specifically associated with self-reported arousal. This is the first study to systematically compare FR measurement of spontaneous emotional reactions to standardized emotional images with established psychophysiological measurement tools. This novel technology has yet to make strides to surpass the sensitivity of established psychophysiological measures. However, it provides a promising new measurement technique for non-contact assessment of emotional responses. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7316962/ /pubmed/32636788 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01388 Text en Copyright © 2020 Höfling, Gerdes, Föhl and Alpers. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Höfling, T. Tim A. Gerdes, Antje B. M. Föhl, Ulrich Alpers, Georg W. Read My Face: Automatic Facial Coding Versus Psychophysiological Indicators of Emotional Valence and Arousal |
title | Read My Face: Automatic Facial Coding Versus Psychophysiological Indicators of Emotional Valence and Arousal |
title_full | Read My Face: Automatic Facial Coding Versus Psychophysiological Indicators of Emotional Valence and Arousal |
title_fullStr | Read My Face: Automatic Facial Coding Versus Psychophysiological Indicators of Emotional Valence and Arousal |
title_full_unstemmed | Read My Face: Automatic Facial Coding Versus Psychophysiological Indicators of Emotional Valence and Arousal |
title_short | Read My Face: Automatic Facial Coding Versus Psychophysiological Indicators of Emotional Valence and Arousal |
title_sort | read my face: automatic facial coding versus psychophysiological indicators of emotional valence and arousal |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7316962/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32636788 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01388 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hoflingttima readmyfaceautomaticfacialcodingversuspsychophysiologicalindicatorsofemotionalvalenceandarousal AT gerdesantjebm readmyfaceautomaticfacialcodingversuspsychophysiologicalindicatorsofemotionalvalenceandarousal AT fohlulrich readmyfaceautomaticfacialcodingversuspsychophysiologicalindicatorsofemotionalvalenceandarousal AT alpersgeorgw readmyfaceautomaticfacialcodingversuspsychophysiologicalindicatorsofemotionalvalenceandarousal |