Cargando…
A novel gamma GLM approach to MRI relaxometry comparisons
PURPOSE: To demonstrate that constant coefficient of variation (CV), but nonconstant absolute variance in MRI relaxometry (T (1), T (2), R (1), R (2)) data leads to erroneous conclusions based on standard linear models such as ordinary least squares (OLS). We propose a gamma generalized linear model...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7317199/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32048764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28192 |
_version_ | 1783550573915668480 |
---|---|
author | Kapre, Rohan Zhou, Junhan Li, Xinzhe Beckett, Laurel Louie, Angelique Y. |
author_facet | Kapre, Rohan Zhou, Junhan Li, Xinzhe Beckett, Laurel Louie, Angelique Y. |
author_sort | Kapre, Rohan |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To demonstrate that constant coefficient of variation (CV), but nonconstant absolute variance in MRI relaxometry (T (1), T (2), R (1), R (2)) data leads to erroneous conclusions based on standard linear models such as ordinary least squares (OLS). We propose a gamma generalized linear model identity link (GGLM‐ID) framework that factors the inherent CV into parameter estimates. We first examined the effects on calculations of contrast agent relaxivity before broadening to other applications such as analysis of variance (ANOVA) and liver iron content (LIC). METHODS: Eight models including OLS and GGLM‐ID were initially fit to data obtained on sulfated dextran iron oxide (SDIO) nanoparticles. Both a resampling simulation on the data as well as two separate Monte Carlo simulations (with and without concentration error) were performed to determine mean square error (MSE) and type I error rate. We then evaluated the performance of OLS/GGLM‐ID on R (1) repeatability and LIC data sets. RESULTS: OLS had an MSE of 4–5× that of GGLM‐ID as well as a type I error rate of 20–30%, whereas GGLM‐ID was near the nominal 5% level in the relaxivity study. Only OLS found statistically significant effects of MRI facility on relaxivity in an R (1) repeatability study, but no significant differences were found in a resampling, whereas GGLM was more consistent. GGLM‐ID was also superior to OLS for modeling LIC. CONCLUSIONS: OLS leads to erroneous conclusions when analyzing MRI relaxometry data. GGLM‐ID factors in the inherent CV of an MRI experiment, leading to more reproducible conclusions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7317199 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73171992020-06-30 A novel gamma GLM approach to MRI relaxometry comparisons Kapre, Rohan Zhou, Junhan Li, Xinzhe Beckett, Laurel Louie, Angelique Y. Magn Reson Med Full Paper—Biophysics and Basic Biomedical Research PURPOSE: To demonstrate that constant coefficient of variation (CV), but nonconstant absolute variance in MRI relaxometry (T (1), T (2), R (1), R (2)) data leads to erroneous conclusions based on standard linear models such as ordinary least squares (OLS). We propose a gamma generalized linear model identity link (GGLM‐ID) framework that factors the inherent CV into parameter estimates. We first examined the effects on calculations of contrast agent relaxivity before broadening to other applications such as analysis of variance (ANOVA) and liver iron content (LIC). METHODS: Eight models including OLS and GGLM‐ID were initially fit to data obtained on sulfated dextran iron oxide (SDIO) nanoparticles. Both a resampling simulation on the data as well as two separate Monte Carlo simulations (with and without concentration error) were performed to determine mean square error (MSE) and type I error rate. We then evaluated the performance of OLS/GGLM‐ID on R (1) repeatability and LIC data sets. RESULTS: OLS had an MSE of 4–5× that of GGLM‐ID as well as a type I error rate of 20–30%, whereas GGLM‐ID was near the nominal 5% level in the relaxivity study. Only OLS found statistically significant effects of MRI facility on relaxivity in an R (1) repeatability study, but no significant differences were found in a resampling, whereas GGLM was more consistent. GGLM‐ID was also superior to OLS for modeling LIC. CONCLUSIONS: OLS leads to erroneous conclusions when analyzing MRI relaxometry data. GGLM‐ID factors in the inherent CV of an MRI experiment, leading to more reproducible conclusions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-02-12 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7317199/ /pubmed/32048764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28192 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Full Paper—Biophysics and Basic Biomedical Research Kapre, Rohan Zhou, Junhan Li, Xinzhe Beckett, Laurel Louie, Angelique Y. A novel gamma GLM approach to MRI relaxometry comparisons |
title | A novel gamma GLM approach to MRI relaxometry comparisons |
title_full | A novel gamma GLM approach to MRI relaxometry comparisons |
title_fullStr | A novel gamma GLM approach to MRI relaxometry comparisons |
title_full_unstemmed | A novel gamma GLM approach to MRI relaxometry comparisons |
title_short | A novel gamma GLM approach to MRI relaxometry comparisons |
title_sort | novel gamma glm approach to mri relaxometry comparisons |
topic | Full Paper—Biophysics and Basic Biomedical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7317199/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32048764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28192 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kaprerohan anovelgammaglmapproachtomrirelaxometrycomparisons AT zhoujunhan anovelgammaglmapproachtomrirelaxometrycomparisons AT lixinzhe anovelgammaglmapproachtomrirelaxometrycomparisons AT beckettlaurel anovelgammaglmapproachtomrirelaxometrycomparisons AT louieangeliquey anovelgammaglmapproachtomrirelaxometrycomparisons AT kaprerohan novelgammaglmapproachtomrirelaxometrycomparisons AT zhoujunhan novelgammaglmapproachtomrirelaxometrycomparisons AT lixinzhe novelgammaglmapproachtomrirelaxometrycomparisons AT beckettlaurel novelgammaglmapproachtomrirelaxometrycomparisons AT louieangeliquey novelgammaglmapproachtomrirelaxometrycomparisons |