Cargando…
Recommendations for rosacea diagnosis, classification and management: update from the global ROSacea COnsensus 2019 panel
BACKGROUND: A transition from a subtyping to a phenotyping approach in rosacea is underway, allowing individual patient management according to presenting features instead of categorization by predefined subtypes. The ROSacea COnsensus (ROSCO) 2017 recommendations further support this transition and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7317217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31392722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.18420 |
_version_ | 1783550578219024384 |
---|---|
author | Schaller, M. Almeida, L.M.C. Bewley, A. Cribier, B. Del Rosso, J. Dlova, N.C. Gallo, R.L. Granstein, R.D. Kautz, G. Mannis, M.J. Micali, G. Oon, H.H. Rajagopalan, M. Steinhoff, M. Tanghetti, E. Thiboutot, D. Troielli, P. Webster, G. Zierhut, M. van Zuuren, E.J. Tan, J. |
author_facet | Schaller, M. Almeida, L.M.C. Bewley, A. Cribier, B. Del Rosso, J. Dlova, N.C. Gallo, R.L. Granstein, R.D. Kautz, G. Mannis, M.J. Micali, G. Oon, H.H. Rajagopalan, M. Steinhoff, M. Tanghetti, E. Thiboutot, D. Troielli, P. Webster, G. Zierhut, M. van Zuuren, E.J. Tan, J. |
author_sort | Schaller, M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A transition from a subtyping to a phenotyping approach in rosacea is underway, allowing individual patient management according to presenting features instead of categorization by predefined subtypes. The ROSacea COnsensus (ROSCO) 2017 recommendations further support this transition and align with guidance from other working groups. OBJECTIVES: To update and extend previous global ROSCO recommendations in line with the latest research and continue supporting uptake of the phenotype approach in rosacea through clinical tool development. METHODS: Nineteen dermatologists and two ophthalmologists used a modified Delphi approach to reach consensus on statements pertaining to critical aspects of rosacea diagnosis, classification and management. Voting was electronic and blinded. RESULTS: Delphi statements on which the panel achieved consensus of ≥ 75% voting ‘Agree’ or ‘Strongly agree’ are presented. The panel recommends discussing disease burden with patients during consultations, using four questions to assist conversations. The primary treatment objective should be achievement of complete clearance, owing to previously established clinical benefits for patients. Cutaneous and ocular features are defined. Treatments have been reassessed in line with recent evidence and the prior treatment algorithm updated. Combination therapy is recommended to benefit patients with multiple features. Ongoing monitoring and dialogue should take place between physician and patients, covering defined factors to maximize outcomes. A prototype clinical tool (Rosacea Tracker) and patient case studies have been developed from consensus statements. CONCLUSIONS: The current survey updates previous recommendations as a basis for local guideline development and provides clinical tools to facilitate a phenotype approach in practice and improve rosacea patient management. What's already known about this topic? A transition to a phenotype approach in rosacea is underway and is being recommended by multiple working groups. New research has become available since the previous ROSCO consensus, necessitating an update and extension of recommendations. What does this study add? We offer updated global recommendations for clinical practice that account for recent research, to continue supporting the transition to a phenotype approach in rosacea. We present prototype clinical tools to facilitate use of the phenotype approach in practice and improve management of patients with rosacea. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7317217 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73172172020-06-30 Recommendations for rosacea diagnosis, classification and management: update from the global ROSacea COnsensus 2019 panel Schaller, M. Almeida, L.M.C. Bewley, A. Cribier, B. Del Rosso, J. Dlova, N.C. Gallo, R.L. Granstein, R.D. Kautz, G. Mannis, M.J. Micali, G. Oon, H.H. Rajagopalan, M. Steinhoff, M. Tanghetti, E. Thiboutot, D. Troielli, P. Webster, G. Zierhut, M. van Zuuren, E.J. Tan, J. Br J Dermatol Original Articles BACKGROUND: A transition from a subtyping to a phenotyping approach in rosacea is underway, allowing individual patient management according to presenting features instead of categorization by predefined subtypes. The ROSacea COnsensus (ROSCO) 2017 recommendations further support this transition and align with guidance from other working groups. OBJECTIVES: To update and extend previous global ROSCO recommendations in line with the latest research and continue supporting uptake of the phenotype approach in rosacea through clinical tool development. METHODS: Nineteen dermatologists and two ophthalmologists used a modified Delphi approach to reach consensus on statements pertaining to critical aspects of rosacea diagnosis, classification and management. Voting was electronic and blinded. RESULTS: Delphi statements on which the panel achieved consensus of ≥ 75% voting ‘Agree’ or ‘Strongly agree’ are presented. The panel recommends discussing disease burden with patients during consultations, using four questions to assist conversations. The primary treatment objective should be achievement of complete clearance, owing to previously established clinical benefits for patients. Cutaneous and ocular features are defined. Treatments have been reassessed in line with recent evidence and the prior treatment algorithm updated. Combination therapy is recommended to benefit patients with multiple features. Ongoing monitoring and dialogue should take place between physician and patients, covering defined factors to maximize outcomes. A prototype clinical tool (Rosacea Tracker) and patient case studies have been developed from consensus statements. CONCLUSIONS: The current survey updates previous recommendations as a basis for local guideline development and provides clinical tools to facilitate a phenotype approach in practice and improve rosacea patient management. What's already known about this topic? A transition to a phenotype approach in rosacea is underway and is being recommended by multiple working groups. New research has become available since the previous ROSCO consensus, necessitating an update and extension of recommendations. What does this study add? We offer updated global recommendations for clinical practice that account for recent research, to continue supporting the transition to a phenotype approach in rosacea. We present prototype clinical tools to facilitate use of the phenotype approach in practice and improve management of patients with rosacea. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-10-16 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7317217/ /pubmed/31392722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.18420 Text en © 2019 The Authors. British Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Schaller, M. Almeida, L.M.C. Bewley, A. Cribier, B. Del Rosso, J. Dlova, N.C. Gallo, R.L. Granstein, R.D. Kautz, G. Mannis, M.J. Micali, G. Oon, H.H. Rajagopalan, M. Steinhoff, M. Tanghetti, E. Thiboutot, D. Troielli, P. Webster, G. Zierhut, M. van Zuuren, E.J. Tan, J. Recommendations for rosacea diagnosis, classification and management: update from the global ROSacea COnsensus 2019 panel |
title | Recommendations for rosacea diagnosis, classification and management: update from the global ROSacea COnsensus 2019 panel
|
title_full | Recommendations for rosacea diagnosis, classification and management: update from the global ROSacea COnsensus 2019 panel
|
title_fullStr | Recommendations for rosacea diagnosis, classification and management: update from the global ROSacea COnsensus 2019 panel
|
title_full_unstemmed | Recommendations for rosacea diagnosis, classification and management: update from the global ROSacea COnsensus 2019 panel
|
title_short | Recommendations for rosacea diagnosis, classification and management: update from the global ROSacea COnsensus 2019 panel
|
title_sort | recommendations for rosacea diagnosis, classification and management: update from the global rosacea consensus 2019 panel |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7317217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31392722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.18420 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schallerm recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel AT almeidalmc recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel AT bewleya recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel AT cribierb recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel AT delrossoj recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel AT dlovanc recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel AT gallorl recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel AT gransteinrd recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel AT kautzg recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel AT mannismj recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel AT micalig recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel AT oonhh recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel AT rajagopalanm recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel AT steinhoffm recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel AT tanghettie recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel AT thiboutotd recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel AT troiellip recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel AT websterg recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel AT zierhutm recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel AT vanzuurenej recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel AT tanj recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel |