Cargando…

Recommendations for rosacea diagnosis, classification and management: update from the global ROSacea COnsensus 2019 panel

BACKGROUND: A transition from a subtyping to a phenotyping approach in rosacea is underway, allowing individual patient management according to presenting features instead of categorization by predefined subtypes. The ROSacea COnsensus (ROSCO) 2017 recommendations further support this transition and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schaller, M., Almeida, L.M.C., Bewley, A., Cribier, B., Del Rosso, J., Dlova, N.C., Gallo, R.L., Granstein, R.D., Kautz, G., Mannis, M.J., Micali, G., Oon, H.H., Rajagopalan, M., Steinhoff, M., Tanghetti, E., Thiboutot, D., Troielli, P., Webster, G., Zierhut, M., van Zuuren, E.J., Tan, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7317217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31392722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.18420
_version_ 1783550578219024384
author Schaller, M.
Almeida, L.M.C.
Bewley, A.
Cribier, B.
Del Rosso, J.
Dlova, N.C.
Gallo, R.L.
Granstein, R.D.
Kautz, G.
Mannis, M.J.
Micali, G.
Oon, H.H.
Rajagopalan, M.
Steinhoff, M.
Tanghetti, E.
Thiboutot, D.
Troielli, P.
Webster, G.
Zierhut, M.
van Zuuren, E.J.
Tan, J.
author_facet Schaller, M.
Almeida, L.M.C.
Bewley, A.
Cribier, B.
Del Rosso, J.
Dlova, N.C.
Gallo, R.L.
Granstein, R.D.
Kautz, G.
Mannis, M.J.
Micali, G.
Oon, H.H.
Rajagopalan, M.
Steinhoff, M.
Tanghetti, E.
Thiboutot, D.
Troielli, P.
Webster, G.
Zierhut, M.
van Zuuren, E.J.
Tan, J.
author_sort Schaller, M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A transition from a subtyping to a phenotyping approach in rosacea is underway, allowing individual patient management according to presenting features instead of categorization by predefined subtypes. The ROSacea COnsensus (ROSCO) 2017 recommendations further support this transition and align with guidance from other working groups. OBJECTIVES: To update and extend previous global ROSCO recommendations in line with the latest research and continue supporting uptake of the phenotype approach in rosacea through clinical tool development. METHODS: Nineteen dermatologists and two ophthalmologists used a modified Delphi approach to reach consensus on statements pertaining to critical aspects of rosacea diagnosis, classification and management. Voting was electronic and blinded. RESULTS: Delphi statements on which the panel achieved consensus of ≥ 75% voting ‘Agree’ or ‘Strongly agree’ are presented. The panel recommends discussing disease burden with patients during consultations, using four questions to assist conversations. The primary treatment objective should be achievement of complete clearance, owing to previously established clinical benefits for patients. Cutaneous and ocular features are defined. Treatments have been reassessed in line with recent evidence and the prior treatment algorithm updated. Combination therapy is recommended to benefit patients with multiple features. Ongoing monitoring and dialogue should take place between physician and patients, covering defined factors to maximize outcomes. A prototype clinical tool (Rosacea Tracker) and patient case studies have been developed from consensus statements. CONCLUSIONS: The current survey updates previous recommendations as a basis for local guideline development and provides clinical tools to facilitate a phenotype approach in practice and improve rosacea patient management. What's already known about this topic? A transition to a phenotype approach in rosacea is underway and is being recommended by multiple working groups. New research has become available since the previous ROSCO consensus, necessitating an update and extension of recommendations. What does this study add? We offer updated global recommendations for clinical practice that account for recent research, to continue supporting the transition to a phenotype approach in rosacea. We present prototype clinical tools to facilitate use of the phenotype approach in practice and improve management of patients with rosacea.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7317217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73172172020-06-30 Recommendations for rosacea diagnosis, classification and management: update from the global ROSacea COnsensus 2019 panel Schaller, M. Almeida, L.M.C. Bewley, A. Cribier, B. Del Rosso, J. Dlova, N.C. Gallo, R.L. Granstein, R.D. Kautz, G. Mannis, M.J. Micali, G. Oon, H.H. Rajagopalan, M. Steinhoff, M. Tanghetti, E. Thiboutot, D. Troielli, P. Webster, G. Zierhut, M. van Zuuren, E.J. Tan, J. Br J Dermatol Original Articles BACKGROUND: A transition from a subtyping to a phenotyping approach in rosacea is underway, allowing individual patient management according to presenting features instead of categorization by predefined subtypes. The ROSacea COnsensus (ROSCO) 2017 recommendations further support this transition and align with guidance from other working groups. OBJECTIVES: To update and extend previous global ROSCO recommendations in line with the latest research and continue supporting uptake of the phenotype approach in rosacea through clinical tool development. METHODS: Nineteen dermatologists and two ophthalmologists used a modified Delphi approach to reach consensus on statements pertaining to critical aspects of rosacea diagnosis, classification and management. Voting was electronic and blinded. RESULTS: Delphi statements on which the panel achieved consensus of ≥ 75% voting ‘Agree’ or ‘Strongly agree’ are presented. The panel recommends discussing disease burden with patients during consultations, using four questions to assist conversations. The primary treatment objective should be achievement of complete clearance, owing to previously established clinical benefits for patients. Cutaneous and ocular features are defined. Treatments have been reassessed in line with recent evidence and the prior treatment algorithm updated. Combination therapy is recommended to benefit patients with multiple features. Ongoing monitoring and dialogue should take place between physician and patients, covering defined factors to maximize outcomes. A prototype clinical tool (Rosacea Tracker) and patient case studies have been developed from consensus statements. CONCLUSIONS: The current survey updates previous recommendations as a basis for local guideline development and provides clinical tools to facilitate a phenotype approach in practice and improve rosacea patient management. What's already known about this topic? A transition to a phenotype approach in rosacea is underway and is being recommended by multiple working groups. New research has become available since the previous ROSCO consensus, necessitating an update and extension of recommendations. What does this study add? We offer updated global recommendations for clinical practice that account for recent research, to continue supporting the transition to a phenotype approach in rosacea. We present prototype clinical tools to facilitate use of the phenotype approach in practice and improve management of patients with rosacea. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-10-16 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7317217/ /pubmed/31392722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.18420 Text en © 2019 The Authors. British Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Schaller, M.
Almeida, L.M.C.
Bewley, A.
Cribier, B.
Del Rosso, J.
Dlova, N.C.
Gallo, R.L.
Granstein, R.D.
Kautz, G.
Mannis, M.J.
Micali, G.
Oon, H.H.
Rajagopalan, M.
Steinhoff, M.
Tanghetti, E.
Thiboutot, D.
Troielli, P.
Webster, G.
Zierhut, M.
van Zuuren, E.J.
Tan, J.
Recommendations for rosacea diagnosis, classification and management: update from the global ROSacea COnsensus 2019 panel
title Recommendations for rosacea diagnosis, classification and management: update from the global ROSacea COnsensus 2019 panel
title_full Recommendations for rosacea diagnosis, classification and management: update from the global ROSacea COnsensus 2019 panel
title_fullStr Recommendations for rosacea diagnosis, classification and management: update from the global ROSacea COnsensus 2019 panel
title_full_unstemmed Recommendations for rosacea diagnosis, classification and management: update from the global ROSacea COnsensus 2019 panel
title_short Recommendations for rosacea diagnosis, classification and management: update from the global ROSacea COnsensus 2019 panel
title_sort recommendations for rosacea diagnosis, classification and management: update from the global rosacea consensus 2019 panel
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7317217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31392722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.18420
work_keys_str_mv AT schallerm recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel
AT almeidalmc recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel
AT bewleya recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel
AT cribierb recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel
AT delrossoj recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel
AT dlovanc recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel
AT gallorl recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel
AT gransteinrd recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel
AT kautzg recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel
AT mannismj recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel
AT micalig recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel
AT oonhh recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel
AT rajagopalanm recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel
AT steinhoffm recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel
AT tanghettie recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel
AT thiboutotd recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel
AT troiellip recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel
AT websterg recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel
AT zierhutm recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel
AT vanzuurenej recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel
AT tanj recommendationsforrosaceadiagnosisclassificationandmanagementupdatefromtheglobalrosaceaconsensus2019panel