Cargando…

Risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in women achieving singleton pregnancy spontaneously or after ART: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Women who achieve pregnancy by ART show an increased risk of obstetric and perinatal complications compared with those with spontaneous conception (SC). OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to synthesize the best available evidence regardin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bosdou, Julia K, Anagnostis, Panagiotis, Goulis, Dimitrios G, Lainas, Georgios T, Tarlatzis, Basil C, Grimbizis, Grigoris F, Kolibianakis, Efstratios M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7317285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32441298
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmaa011
_version_ 1783550592726073344
author Bosdou, Julia K
Anagnostis, Panagiotis
Goulis, Dimitrios G
Lainas, Georgios T
Tarlatzis, Basil C
Grimbizis, Grigoris F
Kolibianakis, Efstratios M
author_facet Bosdou, Julia K
Anagnostis, Panagiotis
Goulis, Dimitrios G
Lainas, Georgios T
Tarlatzis, Basil C
Grimbizis, Grigoris F
Kolibianakis, Efstratios M
author_sort Bosdou, Julia K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Women who achieve pregnancy by ART show an increased risk of obstetric and perinatal complications compared with those with spontaneous conception (SC). OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to synthesize the best available evidence regarding the association between ART and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in women with singleton pregnancies. The research question asked was whether the risk of GDM is higher in women achieving singleton pregnancy by ART compared with those achieving singleton pregnancy spontaneously. SEARCH METHODS: A literature search, in MEDLINE, Scopus and Cochrane databases, covering the period 1978–2019, was performed aiming to identify studies comparing the risk of GDM in singleton pregnancies after ART versus after SC. Both matched and unmatched studies were considered eligible. Meta-analysis of weighted data was performed using the random effects model. Results were reported as risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI. Heterogeneity was quantified with the I(2) index. OUTCOMES: The study reports on 63 760 women who achieved a singleton pregnancy after ART (GDM was present in 4776) and 1 870 734 women who achieved a singleton pregnancy spontaneously (GDM in 158 526). Women with singleton pregnancy achieved by ART showed a higher risk of GDM compared with those with singleton pregnancy achieved spontaneously (RR 1.53, 95% CI 1.39–1.69; I(2) 78.6%, n = 37, 1 893 599 women). The direction or the magnitude of the effect observed did not change in subgroup analysis based on whether the study was matched (n = 17) or unmatched (n = 20) (matched: RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.17–1.72; I(2) 61.5%—unmatched: RR 1.58, 95% CI 1.40–1.78; I(2) 84.1%) or whether it was prospective (n = 12) or retrospective (n = 25) (prospective studies: RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.27–1.83, I(2) 62.2%—retrospective studies: RR 1.53, 95% CI 1.36–1.72, I(2) 82.5%). Regarding the method of fertilization, a higher risk of GDM after ART versus SC was observed after IVF (n = 7), but not after ICSI (n = 6), (IVF: RR 1.95, 95% CI 1.56–2.44, I(2) 43.1%—ICSI: RR 1.42, 95% CI 0.94–2.15, I(2) 73.5%). Moreover, regarding the type of embryo transfer (ET), a higher risk of GDM after ART versus SC was observed after fresh (n = 14) but not after frozen (n = 3) ET (fresh ET: RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.03–1.85, I(2) 75.4%—frozen ET: RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.10–2.19; I(2) 73.1%). A higher risk of GDM was observed after ART regardless of whether the eligible studies included patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.33–1.66, I(2) 75.0%) or not (RR 4.12, 95% CI 2.63–6.45, I(2) 0%), or whether this information was unclear (RR 1.46, 95% CI 1.22–1.75, I(2) 77.7%). WIDER IMPLICATIONS: The present systematic review and meta-analysis, by analysing 1 893 599 women, showed a higher risk of GDM in women achieving singleton pregnancy by ART compared with those achieving singleton pregnancy spontaneously. This finding highlights the importance of early detection of GDM in women treated by ART that could lead to timely and effective interventions, prior to ART as well as during early pregnancy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7317285
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73172852020-07-01 Risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in women achieving singleton pregnancy spontaneously or after ART: a systematic review and meta-analysis Bosdou, Julia K Anagnostis, Panagiotis Goulis, Dimitrios G Lainas, Georgios T Tarlatzis, Basil C Grimbizis, Grigoris F Kolibianakis, Efstratios M Hum Reprod Update Articles BACKGROUND: Women who achieve pregnancy by ART show an increased risk of obstetric and perinatal complications compared with those with spontaneous conception (SC). OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to synthesize the best available evidence regarding the association between ART and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in women with singleton pregnancies. The research question asked was whether the risk of GDM is higher in women achieving singleton pregnancy by ART compared with those achieving singleton pregnancy spontaneously. SEARCH METHODS: A literature search, in MEDLINE, Scopus and Cochrane databases, covering the period 1978–2019, was performed aiming to identify studies comparing the risk of GDM in singleton pregnancies after ART versus after SC. Both matched and unmatched studies were considered eligible. Meta-analysis of weighted data was performed using the random effects model. Results were reported as risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI. Heterogeneity was quantified with the I(2) index. OUTCOMES: The study reports on 63 760 women who achieved a singleton pregnancy after ART (GDM was present in 4776) and 1 870 734 women who achieved a singleton pregnancy spontaneously (GDM in 158 526). Women with singleton pregnancy achieved by ART showed a higher risk of GDM compared with those with singleton pregnancy achieved spontaneously (RR 1.53, 95% CI 1.39–1.69; I(2) 78.6%, n = 37, 1 893 599 women). The direction or the magnitude of the effect observed did not change in subgroup analysis based on whether the study was matched (n = 17) or unmatched (n = 20) (matched: RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.17–1.72; I(2) 61.5%—unmatched: RR 1.58, 95% CI 1.40–1.78; I(2) 84.1%) or whether it was prospective (n = 12) or retrospective (n = 25) (prospective studies: RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.27–1.83, I(2) 62.2%—retrospective studies: RR 1.53, 95% CI 1.36–1.72, I(2) 82.5%). Regarding the method of fertilization, a higher risk of GDM after ART versus SC was observed after IVF (n = 7), but not after ICSI (n = 6), (IVF: RR 1.95, 95% CI 1.56–2.44, I(2) 43.1%—ICSI: RR 1.42, 95% CI 0.94–2.15, I(2) 73.5%). Moreover, regarding the type of embryo transfer (ET), a higher risk of GDM after ART versus SC was observed after fresh (n = 14) but not after frozen (n = 3) ET (fresh ET: RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.03–1.85, I(2) 75.4%—frozen ET: RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.10–2.19; I(2) 73.1%). A higher risk of GDM was observed after ART regardless of whether the eligible studies included patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.33–1.66, I(2) 75.0%) or not (RR 4.12, 95% CI 2.63–6.45, I(2) 0%), or whether this information was unclear (RR 1.46, 95% CI 1.22–1.75, I(2) 77.7%). WIDER IMPLICATIONS: The present systematic review and meta-analysis, by analysing 1 893 599 women, showed a higher risk of GDM in women achieving singleton pregnancy by ART compared with those achieving singleton pregnancy spontaneously. This finding highlights the importance of early detection of GDM in women treated by ART that could lead to timely and effective interventions, prior to ART as well as during early pregnancy. Oxford University Press 2020-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7317285/ /pubmed/32441298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmaa011 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Articles
Bosdou, Julia K
Anagnostis, Panagiotis
Goulis, Dimitrios G
Lainas, Georgios T
Tarlatzis, Basil C
Grimbizis, Grigoris F
Kolibianakis, Efstratios M
Risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in women achieving singleton pregnancy spontaneously or after ART: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in women achieving singleton pregnancy spontaneously or after ART: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in women achieving singleton pregnancy spontaneously or after ART: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in women achieving singleton pregnancy spontaneously or after ART: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in women achieving singleton pregnancy spontaneously or after ART: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in women achieving singleton pregnancy spontaneously or after ART: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in women achieving singleton pregnancy spontaneously or after art: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7317285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32441298
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmaa011
work_keys_str_mv AT bosdoujuliak riskofgestationaldiabetesmellitusinwomenachievingsingletonpregnancyspontaneouslyorafterartasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT anagnostispanagiotis riskofgestationaldiabetesmellitusinwomenachievingsingletonpregnancyspontaneouslyorafterartasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT goulisdimitriosg riskofgestationaldiabetesmellitusinwomenachievingsingletonpregnancyspontaneouslyorafterartasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lainasgeorgiost riskofgestationaldiabetesmellitusinwomenachievingsingletonpregnancyspontaneouslyorafterartasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tarlatzisbasilc riskofgestationaldiabetesmellitusinwomenachievingsingletonpregnancyspontaneouslyorafterartasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT grimbizisgrigorisf riskofgestationaldiabetesmellitusinwomenachievingsingletonpregnancyspontaneouslyorafterartasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kolibianakisefstratiosm riskofgestationaldiabetesmellitusinwomenachievingsingletonpregnancyspontaneouslyorafterartasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis