Cargando…

A feasibility study of implementing a patient‐centered outcome set for pregnancy and childbirth

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patient‐reported outcome and experience measures (PROM and PREM) can facilitate shared decision making and hold potential to improve healthcare quality. However, their adoption in perinatal care is still limited. The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Depla, Anne L., Ernst‐Smelt, Hiske E., Poels, Marjolein, Crombag, Neeltje M., Franx, Arie, Bekker, Mireille N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7317300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32607452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.168
_version_ 1783550595164012544
author Depla, Anne L.
Ernst‐Smelt, Hiske E.
Poels, Marjolein
Crombag, Neeltje M.
Franx, Arie
Bekker, Mireille N.
author_facet Depla, Anne L.
Ernst‐Smelt, Hiske E.
Poels, Marjolein
Crombag, Neeltje M.
Franx, Arie
Bekker, Mireille N.
author_sort Depla, Anne L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patient‐reported outcome and experience measures (PROM and PREM) can facilitate shared decision making and hold potential to improve healthcare quality. However, their adoption in perinatal care is still limited. The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) developed a Pregnancy and Childbirth (PCB) outcome set, including PROM and PREM questionnaires. We studied the feasibility to use these PROMs/PREMs in Dutch perinatal care, addressing both women's and professionals' perspective. METHODS: Patients and professionals in primary and hospital care participated. Women under care at one of five timepoints for PROM/PREM collection of the PCB set (2 during pregnancy, 3 postpartum) were e‐mailed a questionnaire and discussed their answers with their obstetric professional the next regular visit. Compliance was recorded. After discussing the PROMs/PREMs, usability and experience were assessed with separate surveys amongst women and professionals. RESULTS: Of 26 women approached, 21 completed and discussed their PROM/PREM questionnaire. Mean questionnaire completion rate was 97%. Average reported time completing the questionnaires was 10 minutes; most women (90%) stated this was acceptable. Women preferred completing questionnaires digitally and discuss their answers with an obstetric professional rather than other care professionals, also 6 months postpartum. Over half of women agreed PROMs/PREMs supported shared decision making (58%), ability to raise issues (60%), and patient‐clinician relationship (52%). Six professionals participated: two obstetricians, two clinical midwives, and two community midwives. Most professionals experienced sufficient time to discuss the responses, except at 6 months postpartum. They knew what items to discuss but did not always feel responsible to act upon them. Professionals agreed PROMs/PREMs supported symptom detection and personalized care. CONCLUSIONS: Patients and obstetric professionals consider the PCB set a feasible instrument for PROM/PREM assessment, with good compliance, acceptability and usability. Important determinants of successful implementation are a well‐equipped ICT‐tool, agreements regarding professionals' responsibilities and how outcomes are discussed or acted upon.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7317300
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73173002020-06-29 A feasibility study of implementing a patient‐centered outcome set for pregnancy and childbirth Depla, Anne L. Ernst‐Smelt, Hiske E. Poels, Marjolein Crombag, Neeltje M. Franx, Arie Bekker, Mireille N. Health Sci Rep Research Articles BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patient‐reported outcome and experience measures (PROM and PREM) can facilitate shared decision making and hold potential to improve healthcare quality. However, their adoption in perinatal care is still limited. The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) developed a Pregnancy and Childbirth (PCB) outcome set, including PROM and PREM questionnaires. We studied the feasibility to use these PROMs/PREMs in Dutch perinatal care, addressing both women's and professionals' perspective. METHODS: Patients and professionals in primary and hospital care participated. Women under care at one of five timepoints for PROM/PREM collection of the PCB set (2 during pregnancy, 3 postpartum) were e‐mailed a questionnaire and discussed their answers with their obstetric professional the next regular visit. Compliance was recorded. After discussing the PROMs/PREMs, usability and experience were assessed with separate surveys amongst women and professionals. RESULTS: Of 26 women approached, 21 completed and discussed their PROM/PREM questionnaire. Mean questionnaire completion rate was 97%. Average reported time completing the questionnaires was 10 minutes; most women (90%) stated this was acceptable. Women preferred completing questionnaires digitally and discuss their answers with an obstetric professional rather than other care professionals, also 6 months postpartum. Over half of women agreed PROMs/PREMs supported shared decision making (58%), ability to raise issues (60%), and patient‐clinician relationship (52%). Six professionals participated: two obstetricians, two clinical midwives, and two community midwives. Most professionals experienced sufficient time to discuss the responses, except at 6 months postpartum. They knew what items to discuss but did not always feel responsible to act upon them. Professionals agreed PROMs/PREMs supported symptom detection and personalized care. CONCLUSIONS: Patients and obstetric professionals consider the PCB set a feasible instrument for PROM/PREM assessment, with good compliance, acceptability and usability. Important determinants of successful implementation are a well‐equipped ICT‐tool, agreements regarding professionals' responsibilities and how outcomes are discussed or acted upon. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7317300/ /pubmed/32607452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.168 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Depla, Anne L.
Ernst‐Smelt, Hiske E.
Poels, Marjolein
Crombag, Neeltje M.
Franx, Arie
Bekker, Mireille N.
A feasibility study of implementing a patient‐centered outcome set for pregnancy and childbirth
title A feasibility study of implementing a patient‐centered outcome set for pregnancy and childbirth
title_full A feasibility study of implementing a patient‐centered outcome set for pregnancy and childbirth
title_fullStr A feasibility study of implementing a patient‐centered outcome set for pregnancy and childbirth
title_full_unstemmed A feasibility study of implementing a patient‐centered outcome set for pregnancy and childbirth
title_short A feasibility study of implementing a patient‐centered outcome set for pregnancy and childbirth
title_sort feasibility study of implementing a patient‐centered outcome set for pregnancy and childbirth
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7317300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32607452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.168
work_keys_str_mv AT deplaannel afeasibilitystudyofimplementingapatientcenteredoutcomesetforpregnancyandchildbirth
AT ernstsmelthiskee afeasibilitystudyofimplementingapatientcenteredoutcomesetforpregnancyandchildbirth
AT poelsmarjolein afeasibilitystudyofimplementingapatientcenteredoutcomesetforpregnancyandchildbirth
AT crombagneeltjem afeasibilitystudyofimplementingapatientcenteredoutcomesetforpregnancyandchildbirth
AT franxarie afeasibilitystudyofimplementingapatientcenteredoutcomesetforpregnancyandchildbirth
AT bekkermireillen afeasibilitystudyofimplementingapatientcenteredoutcomesetforpregnancyandchildbirth
AT deplaannel feasibilitystudyofimplementingapatientcenteredoutcomesetforpregnancyandchildbirth
AT ernstsmelthiskee feasibilitystudyofimplementingapatientcenteredoutcomesetforpregnancyandchildbirth
AT poelsmarjolein feasibilitystudyofimplementingapatientcenteredoutcomesetforpregnancyandchildbirth
AT crombagneeltjem feasibilitystudyofimplementingapatientcenteredoutcomesetforpregnancyandchildbirth
AT franxarie feasibilitystudyofimplementingapatientcenteredoutcomesetforpregnancyandchildbirth
AT bekkermireillen feasibilitystudyofimplementingapatientcenteredoutcomesetforpregnancyandchildbirth