Cargando…
A feasibility study of implementing a patient‐centered outcome set for pregnancy and childbirth
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patient‐reported outcome and experience measures (PROM and PREM) can facilitate shared decision making and hold potential to improve healthcare quality. However, their adoption in perinatal care is still limited. The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHO...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7317300/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32607452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.168 |
_version_ | 1783550595164012544 |
---|---|
author | Depla, Anne L. Ernst‐Smelt, Hiske E. Poels, Marjolein Crombag, Neeltje M. Franx, Arie Bekker, Mireille N. |
author_facet | Depla, Anne L. Ernst‐Smelt, Hiske E. Poels, Marjolein Crombag, Neeltje M. Franx, Arie Bekker, Mireille N. |
author_sort | Depla, Anne L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patient‐reported outcome and experience measures (PROM and PREM) can facilitate shared decision making and hold potential to improve healthcare quality. However, their adoption in perinatal care is still limited. The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) developed a Pregnancy and Childbirth (PCB) outcome set, including PROM and PREM questionnaires. We studied the feasibility to use these PROMs/PREMs in Dutch perinatal care, addressing both women's and professionals' perspective. METHODS: Patients and professionals in primary and hospital care participated. Women under care at one of five timepoints for PROM/PREM collection of the PCB set (2 during pregnancy, 3 postpartum) were e‐mailed a questionnaire and discussed their answers with their obstetric professional the next regular visit. Compliance was recorded. After discussing the PROMs/PREMs, usability and experience were assessed with separate surveys amongst women and professionals. RESULTS: Of 26 women approached, 21 completed and discussed their PROM/PREM questionnaire. Mean questionnaire completion rate was 97%. Average reported time completing the questionnaires was 10 minutes; most women (90%) stated this was acceptable. Women preferred completing questionnaires digitally and discuss their answers with an obstetric professional rather than other care professionals, also 6 months postpartum. Over half of women agreed PROMs/PREMs supported shared decision making (58%), ability to raise issues (60%), and patient‐clinician relationship (52%). Six professionals participated: two obstetricians, two clinical midwives, and two community midwives. Most professionals experienced sufficient time to discuss the responses, except at 6 months postpartum. They knew what items to discuss but did not always feel responsible to act upon them. Professionals agreed PROMs/PREMs supported symptom detection and personalized care. CONCLUSIONS: Patients and obstetric professionals consider the PCB set a feasible instrument for PROM/PREM assessment, with good compliance, acceptability and usability. Important determinants of successful implementation are a well‐equipped ICT‐tool, agreements regarding professionals' responsibilities and how outcomes are discussed or acted upon. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7317300 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73173002020-06-29 A feasibility study of implementing a patient‐centered outcome set for pregnancy and childbirth Depla, Anne L. Ernst‐Smelt, Hiske E. Poels, Marjolein Crombag, Neeltje M. Franx, Arie Bekker, Mireille N. Health Sci Rep Research Articles BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patient‐reported outcome and experience measures (PROM and PREM) can facilitate shared decision making and hold potential to improve healthcare quality. However, their adoption in perinatal care is still limited. The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) developed a Pregnancy and Childbirth (PCB) outcome set, including PROM and PREM questionnaires. We studied the feasibility to use these PROMs/PREMs in Dutch perinatal care, addressing both women's and professionals' perspective. METHODS: Patients and professionals in primary and hospital care participated. Women under care at one of five timepoints for PROM/PREM collection of the PCB set (2 during pregnancy, 3 postpartum) were e‐mailed a questionnaire and discussed their answers with their obstetric professional the next regular visit. Compliance was recorded. After discussing the PROMs/PREMs, usability and experience were assessed with separate surveys amongst women and professionals. RESULTS: Of 26 women approached, 21 completed and discussed their PROM/PREM questionnaire. Mean questionnaire completion rate was 97%. Average reported time completing the questionnaires was 10 minutes; most women (90%) stated this was acceptable. Women preferred completing questionnaires digitally and discuss their answers with an obstetric professional rather than other care professionals, also 6 months postpartum. Over half of women agreed PROMs/PREMs supported shared decision making (58%), ability to raise issues (60%), and patient‐clinician relationship (52%). Six professionals participated: two obstetricians, two clinical midwives, and two community midwives. Most professionals experienced sufficient time to discuss the responses, except at 6 months postpartum. They knew what items to discuss but did not always feel responsible to act upon them. Professionals agreed PROMs/PREMs supported symptom detection and personalized care. CONCLUSIONS: Patients and obstetric professionals consider the PCB set a feasible instrument for PROM/PREM assessment, with good compliance, acceptability and usability. Important determinants of successful implementation are a well‐equipped ICT‐tool, agreements regarding professionals' responsibilities and how outcomes are discussed or acted upon. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7317300/ /pubmed/32607452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.168 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Depla, Anne L. Ernst‐Smelt, Hiske E. Poels, Marjolein Crombag, Neeltje M. Franx, Arie Bekker, Mireille N. A feasibility study of implementing a patient‐centered outcome set for pregnancy and childbirth |
title | A feasibility study of implementing a patient‐centered outcome set for pregnancy and childbirth |
title_full | A feasibility study of implementing a patient‐centered outcome set for pregnancy and childbirth |
title_fullStr | A feasibility study of implementing a patient‐centered outcome set for pregnancy and childbirth |
title_full_unstemmed | A feasibility study of implementing a patient‐centered outcome set for pregnancy and childbirth |
title_short | A feasibility study of implementing a patient‐centered outcome set for pregnancy and childbirth |
title_sort | feasibility study of implementing a patient‐centered outcome set for pregnancy and childbirth |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7317300/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32607452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.168 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deplaannel afeasibilitystudyofimplementingapatientcenteredoutcomesetforpregnancyandchildbirth AT ernstsmelthiskee afeasibilitystudyofimplementingapatientcenteredoutcomesetforpregnancyandchildbirth AT poelsmarjolein afeasibilitystudyofimplementingapatientcenteredoutcomesetforpregnancyandchildbirth AT crombagneeltjem afeasibilitystudyofimplementingapatientcenteredoutcomesetforpregnancyandchildbirth AT franxarie afeasibilitystudyofimplementingapatientcenteredoutcomesetforpregnancyandchildbirth AT bekkermireillen afeasibilitystudyofimplementingapatientcenteredoutcomesetforpregnancyandchildbirth AT deplaannel feasibilitystudyofimplementingapatientcenteredoutcomesetforpregnancyandchildbirth AT ernstsmelthiskee feasibilitystudyofimplementingapatientcenteredoutcomesetforpregnancyandchildbirth AT poelsmarjolein feasibilitystudyofimplementingapatientcenteredoutcomesetforpregnancyandchildbirth AT crombagneeltjem feasibilitystudyofimplementingapatientcenteredoutcomesetforpregnancyandchildbirth AT franxarie feasibilitystudyofimplementingapatientcenteredoutcomesetforpregnancyandchildbirth AT bekkermireillen feasibilitystudyofimplementingapatientcenteredoutcomesetforpregnancyandchildbirth |