Cargando…

A standardised bioassay method using a bench‐top spray tower to evaluate entomopathogenic fungi for control of the greenhouse whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum

BACKGROUND: Bioassays evaluating entomopathogenic fungi (EPF) isolates for effective microbial control of whitefly are a fundamental part of the screening process for bioprotectants, but development of repeatable, robust bioassays is not straightforward. Currently, there is no readily available stan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spence, Eleanor L, Chandler, David, Edgington, Steve, Berry, Shaun D, Martin, Gareth, O'Sullivan, Christine, Svendsen, Claus, Hesketh, Helen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7317564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32077577
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.5794
_version_ 1783550657930723328
author Spence, Eleanor L
Chandler, David
Edgington, Steve
Berry, Shaun D
Martin, Gareth
O'Sullivan, Christine
Svendsen, Claus
Hesketh, Helen
author_facet Spence, Eleanor L
Chandler, David
Edgington, Steve
Berry, Shaun D
Martin, Gareth
O'Sullivan, Christine
Svendsen, Claus
Hesketh, Helen
author_sort Spence, Eleanor L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bioassays evaluating entomopathogenic fungi (EPF) isolates for effective microbial control of whitefly are a fundamental part of the screening process for bioprotectants, but development of repeatable, robust bioassays is not straightforward. Currently, there is no readily available standardised method to test the efficacy of EPF on whitefly. Here, we describe the calibration and use of a spray tower to deliver a standardised protocol to assess EPF activity; the method was validated using 18 EPF from four genera in tests against greenhouse whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood). RESULTS: At 138 kPa, the sprayer delivered 0.062 mL mm(−2) (620 L ha(−1)) and an even deposition of spray across the central 1590 mm(2) of the spray area. Average conidial deposition for all EPF was 252 conidia mm(−2) and equivalent to 2.5 × 10(12) conidia ha(−1) at an application concentration of 1 × 10(7) conidia mL(−1). Conidial deposition of a test Beauveria bassiana suspension increased with increasing application concentration. Egg laying by T. vaporariorum adults was restricted to 177 mm(2) using clip cages specifically designed to ensure that third‐instar T. vaporariorum received a uniform spray coverage. Nymphs occupied 373 ± 5 mm(2) of the leaf after migrating during the first instar. Average T. vaporariorum mortality totaled 8–89% 14 days after application of 1 × 10(7) conidia mL(−1) of each EPF isolate. CONCLUSION: Combining the calibrated sprayer and bioassay method provides a reliable, standardised approach to test the virulence of EPF against whitefly nymphs. This laboratory‐based assay is affordable, replicable and allows the user to alter the dose of conidia applied to the target.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7317564
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73175642020-06-29 A standardised bioassay method using a bench‐top spray tower to evaluate entomopathogenic fungi for control of the greenhouse whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum Spence, Eleanor L Chandler, David Edgington, Steve Berry, Shaun D Martin, Gareth O'Sullivan, Christine Svendsen, Claus Hesketh, Helen Pest Manag Sci Research Articles BACKGROUND: Bioassays evaluating entomopathogenic fungi (EPF) isolates for effective microbial control of whitefly are a fundamental part of the screening process for bioprotectants, but development of repeatable, robust bioassays is not straightforward. Currently, there is no readily available standardised method to test the efficacy of EPF on whitefly. Here, we describe the calibration and use of a spray tower to deliver a standardised protocol to assess EPF activity; the method was validated using 18 EPF from four genera in tests against greenhouse whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood). RESULTS: At 138 kPa, the sprayer delivered 0.062 mL mm(−2) (620 L ha(−1)) and an even deposition of spray across the central 1590 mm(2) of the spray area. Average conidial deposition for all EPF was 252 conidia mm(−2) and equivalent to 2.5 × 10(12) conidia ha(−1) at an application concentration of 1 × 10(7) conidia mL(−1). Conidial deposition of a test Beauveria bassiana suspension increased with increasing application concentration. Egg laying by T. vaporariorum adults was restricted to 177 mm(2) using clip cages specifically designed to ensure that third‐instar T. vaporariorum received a uniform spray coverage. Nymphs occupied 373 ± 5 mm(2) of the leaf after migrating during the first instar. Average T. vaporariorum mortality totaled 8–89% 14 days after application of 1 × 10(7) conidia mL(−1) of each EPF isolate. CONCLUSION: Combining the calibrated sprayer and bioassay method provides a reliable, standardised approach to test the virulence of EPF against whitefly nymphs. This laboratory‐based assay is affordable, replicable and allows the user to alter the dose of conidia applied to the target. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2020-03-12 2020-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7317564/ /pubmed/32077577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.5794 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Spence, Eleanor L
Chandler, David
Edgington, Steve
Berry, Shaun D
Martin, Gareth
O'Sullivan, Christine
Svendsen, Claus
Hesketh, Helen
A standardised bioassay method using a bench‐top spray tower to evaluate entomopathogenic fungi for control of the greenhouse whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum
title A standardised bioassay method using a bench‐top spray tower to evaluate entomopathogenic fungi for control of the greenhouse whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum
title_full A standardised bioassay method using a bench‐top spray tower to evaluate entomopathogenic fungi for control of the greenhouse whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum
title_fullStr A standardised bioassay method using a bench‐top spray tower to evaluate entomopathogenic fungi for control of the greenhouse whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum
title_full_unstemmed A standardised bioassay method using a bench‐top spray tower to evaluate entomopathogenic fungi for control of the greenhouse whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum
title_short A standardised bioassay method using a bench‐top spray tower to evaluate entomopathogenic fungi for control of the greenhouse whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum
title_sort standardised bioassay method using a bench‐top spray tower to evaluate entomopathogenic fungi for control of the greenhouse whitefly, trialeurodes vaporariorum
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7317564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32077577
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.5794
work_keys_str_mv AT spenceeleanorl astandardisedbioassaymethodusingabenchtopspraytowertoevaluateentomopathogenicfungiforcontrolofthegreenhousewhiteflytrialeurodesvaporariorum
AT chandlerdavid astandardisedbioassaymethodusingabenchtopspraytowertoevaluateentomopathogenicfungiforcontrolofthegreenhousewhiteflytrialeurodesvaporariorum
AT edgingtonsteve astandardisedbioassaymethodusingabenchtopspraytowertoevaluateentomopathogenicfungiforcontrolofthegreenhousewhiteflytrialeurodesvaporariorum
AT berryshaund astandardisedbioassaymethodusingabenchtopspraytowertoevaluateentomopathogenicfungiforcontrolofthegreenhousewhiteflytrialeurodesvaporariorum
AT martingareth astandardisedbioassaymethodusingabenchtopspraytowertoevaluateentomopathogenicfungiforcontrolofthegreenhousewhiteflytrialeurodesvaporariorum
AT osullivanchristine astandardisedbioassaymethodusingabenchtopspraytowertoevaluateentomopathogenicfungiforcontrolofthegreenhousewhiteflytrialeurodesvaporariorum
AT svendsenclaus astandardisedbioassaymethodusingabenchtopspraytowertoevaluateentomopathogenicfungiforcontrolofthegreenhousewhiteflytrialeurodesvaporariorum
AT heskethhelen astandardisedbioassaymethodusingabenchtopspraytowertoevaluateentomopathogenicfungiforcontrolofthegreenhousewhiteflytrialeurodesvaporariorum
AT spenceeleanorl standardisedbioassaymethodusingabenchtopspraytowertoevaluateentomopathogenicfungiforcontrolofthegreenhousewhiteflytrialeurodesvaporariorum
AT chandlerdavid standardisedbioassaymethodusingabenchtopspraytowertoevaluateentomopathogenicfungiforcontrolofthegreenhousewhiteflytrialeurodesvaporariorum
AT edgingtonsteve standardisedbioassaymethodusingabenchtopspraytowertoevaluateentomopathogenicfungiforcontrolofthegreenhousewhiteflytrialeurodesvaporariorum
AT berryshaund standardisedbioassaymethodusingabenchtopspraytowertoevaluateentomopathogenicfungiforcontrolofthegreenhousewhiteflytrialeurodesvaporariorum
AT martingareth standardisedbioassaymethodusingabenchtopspraytowertoevaluateentomopathogenicfungiforcontrolofthegreenhousewhiteflytrialeurodesvaporariorum
AT osullivanchristine standardisedbioassaymethodusingabenchtopspraytowertoevaluateentomopathogenicfungiforcontrolofthegreenhousewhiteflytrialeurodesvaporariorum
AT svendsenclaus standardisedbioassaymethodusingabenchtopspraytowertoevaluateentomopathogenicfungiforcontrolofthegreenhousewhiteflytrialeurodesvaporariorum
AT heskethhelen standardisedbioassaymethodusingabenchtopspraytowertoevaluateentomopathogenicfungiforcontrolofthegreenhousewhiteflytrialeurodesvaporariorum