Cargando…

School bonding and ethos in trajectories of offending: Results from the Belfast Youth Development Study

BACKGROUND: Aspects of the school environment, such as school attachment levels, are linked to adolescent offending. Previous research has not clarified whether a school‐ or individual‐level intervention approach to improving pupil school attachment and commitment is most likely to reduce adolescent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Higgins, Kathryn, Perra, Oliver, Jordan, Julie‐Ann, O'Neill, Tara, McCann, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7317740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32065389
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12303
_version_ 1783550695470792704
author Higgins, Kathryn
Perra, Oliver
Jordan, Julie‐Ann
O'Neill, Tara
McCann, Mark
author_facet Higgins, Kathryn
Perra, Oliver
Jordan, Julie‐Ann
O'Neill, Tara
McCann, Mark
author_sort Higgins, Kathryn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Aspects of the school environment, such as school attachment levels, are linked to adolescent offending. Previous research has not clarified whether a school‐ or individual‐level intervention approach to improving pupil school attachment and commitment is most likely to reduce adolescent offending. AIM: The present study assessed the impact of individual‐ and school‐level variables on offending behaviour from ages 14–16 years. SAMPLE: The participants were 4,049 young people from 42 mainstream schools who took part in the Belfast Youth Development Study. METHOD: Multilevel modelling was used to examine the relative influence of individual‐ and school‐level variables on offending behaviour in adolescence. RESULTS: Pupils who had high levels of school commitment and attachment and were involved in fewer fights at age 13 reported lower levels of offending at age 14 years. Differences between schools accounted for 7% of the variation in offending. Lower individual‐level commitment was associated with higher initial levels of offending at age 14 if the school‐level ethos was of higher commitment. Lack of safety at the school level appeared to be detrimental for young people not exposed to socio‐economic deprivation. CONCLUSIONS: Individual‐level targeted interventions are likely to be a more cost‐effective approach of reducing offending behaviour in adolescence. Additional, albeit smaller, reductions in offending levels could be achieved through school‐level interventions in some school types (e.g., deprived areas).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7317740
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73177402020-06-29 School bonding and ethos in trajectories of offending: Results from the Belfast Youth Development Study Higgins, Kathryn Perra, Oliver Jordan, Julie‐Ann O'Neill, Tara McCann, Mark Br J Educ Psychol Original Articles BACKGROUND: Aspects of the school environment, such as school attachment levels, are linked to adolescent offending. Previous research has not clarified whether a school‐ or individual‐level intervention approach to improving pupil school attachment and commitment is most likely to reduce adolescent offending. AIM: The present study assessed the impact of individual‐ and school‐level variables on offending behaviour from ages 14–16 years. SAMPLE: The participants were 4,049 young people from 42 mainstream schools who took part in the Belfast Youth Development Study. METHOD: Multilevel modelling was used to examine the relative influence of individual‐ and school‐level variables on offending behaviour in adolescence. RESULTS: Pupils who had high levels of school commitment and attachment and were involved in fewer fights at age 13 reported lower levels of offending at age 14 years. Differences between schools accounted for 7% of the variation in offending. Lower individual‐level commitment was associated with higher initial levels of offending at age 14 if the school‐level ethos was of higher commitment. Lack of safety at the school level appeared to be detrimental for young people not exposed to socio‐economic deprivation. CONCLUSIONS: Individual‐level targeted interventions are likely to be a more cost‐effective approach of reducing offending behaviour in adolescence. Additional, albeit smaller, reductions in offending levels could be achieved through school‐level interventions in some school types (e.g., deprived areas). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-02-17 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7317740/ /pubmed/32065389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12303 Text en © 2020 The Authors. British Journal of Educational Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Higgins, Kathryn
Perra, Oliver
Jordan, Julie‐Ann
O'Neill, Tara
McCann, Mark
School bonding and ethos in trajectories of offending: Results from the Belfast Youth Development Study
title School bonding and ethos in trajectories of offending: Results from the Belfast Youth Development Study
title_full School bonding and ethos in trajectories of offending: Results from the Belfast Youth Development Study
title_fullStr School bonding and ethos in trajectories of offending: Results from the Belfast Youth Development Study
title_full_unstemmed School bonding and ethos in trajectories of offending: Results from the Belfast Youth Development Study
title_short School bonding and ethos in trajectories of offending: Results from the Belfast Youth Development Study
title_sort school bonding and ethos in trajectories of offending: results from the belfast youth development study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7317740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32065389
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12303
work_keys_str_mv AT higginskathryn schoolbondingandethosintrajectoriesofoffendingresultsfromthebelfastyouthdevelopmentstudy
AT perraoliver schoolbondingandethosintrajectoriesofoffendingresultsfromthebelfastyouthdevelopmentstudy
AT jordanjulieann schoolbondingandethosintrajectoriesofoffendingresultsfromthebelfastyouthdevelopmentstudy
AT oneilltara schoolbondingandethosintrajectoriesofoffendingresultsfromthebelfastyouthdevelopmentstudy
AT mccannmark schoolbondingandethosintrajectoriesofoffendingresultsfromthebelfastyouthdevelopmentstudy