Cargando…

External validation and clinical utility of prognostic prediction models for gestational diabetes mellitus: A prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION: We performed an independent validation study of all published first trimester prediction models, containing non‐invasive predictors, for the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. Furthermore, the clinical potential of the best performing models was evaluated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sys...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meertens, Linda J. E., Scheepers, Hubertina C. J., van Kuijk, Sander M. J., Roeleveld, Nel, Aardenburg, Robert, van Dooren, Ivo M. A., Langenveld, Josje, Zwaan, Iris M., Spaanderman, Marc E. A., van Gelder, Marleen M. H. J., Smits, Luc J. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7317858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31955406
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13811
_version_ 1783550723344039936
author Meertens, Linda J. E.
Scheepers, Hubertina C. J.
van Kuijk, Sander M. J.
Roeleveld, Nel
Aardenburg, Robert
van Dooren, Ivo M. A.
Langenveld, Josje
Zwaan, Iris M.
Spaanderman, Marc E. A.
van Gelder, Marleen M. H. J.
Smits, Luc J. M.
author_facet Meertens, Linda J. E.
Scheepers, Hubertina C. J.
van Kuijk, Sander M. J.
Roeleveld, Nel
Aardenburg, Robert
van Dooren, Ivo M. A.
Langenveld, Josje
Zwaan, Iris M.
Spaanderman, Marc E. A.
van Gelder, Marleen M. H. J.
Smits, Luc J. M.
author_sort Meertens, Linda J. E.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: We performed an independent validation study of all published first trimester prediction models, containing non‐invasive predictors, for the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. Furthermore, the clinical potential of the best performing models was evaluated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Systemically selected prediction models from the literature were validated in a Dutch prospective cohort using data from Expect Study I and PRIDE Study. The predictive performance of the models was evaluated by discrimination and calibration. Clinical utility was assessed using decision curve analysis. Screening performance measures were calculated at different risk thresholds for the best model and compared with current selective screening strategies. RESULTS: The validation cohort included 5260 women. Gestational diabetes mellitus was diagnosed in 127 women (2.4%). The discriminative performance of the 12 included models ranged from 68% to 75%. Nearly all models overestimated the risk. After recalibration, agreement between the observed outcomes and predicted probabilities improved for most models. CONCLUSIONS: The best performing prediction models showed acceptable performance measures and may enable more personalized medicine‐based antenatal care for women at risk of developing gestational diabetes mellitus compared with current applied strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7317858
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73178582020-06-29 External validation and clinical utility of prognostic prediction models for gestational diabetes mellitus: A prospective cohort study Meertens, Linda J. E. Scheepers, Hubertina C. J. van Kuijk, Sander M. J. Roeleveld, Nel Aardenburg, Robert van Dooren, Ivo M. A. Langenveld, Josje Zwaan, Iris M. Spaanderman, Marc E. A. van Gelder, Marleen M. H. J. Smits, Luc J. M. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Pregnancy INTRODUCTION: We performed an independent validation study of all published first trimester prediction models, containing non‐invasive predictors, for the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. Furthermore, the clinical potential of the best performing models was evaluated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Systemically selected prediction models from the literature were validated in a Dutch prospective cohort using data from Expect Study I and PRIDE Study. The predictive performance of the models was evaluated by discrimination and calibration. Clinical utility was assessed using decision curve analysis. Screening performance measures were calculated at different risk thresholds for the best model and compared with current selective screening strategies. RESULTS: The validation cohort included 5260 women. Gestational diabetes mellitus was diagnosed in 127 women (2.4%). The discriminative performance of the 12 included models ranged from 68% to 75%. Nearly all models overestimated the risk. After recalibration, agreement between the observed outcomes and predicted probabilities improved for most models. CONCLUSIONS: The best performing prediction models showed acceptable performance measures and may enable more personalized medicine‐based antenatal care for women at risk of developing gestational diabetes mellitus compared with current applied strategies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-02-14 2020-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7317858/ /pubmed/31955406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13811 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG) This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Pregnancy
Meertens, Linda J. E.
Scheepers, Hubertina C. J.
van Kuijk, Sander M. J.
Roeleveld, Nel
Aardenburg, Robert
van Dooren, Ivo M. A.
Langenveld, Josje
Zwaan, Iris M.
Spaanderman, Marc E. A.
van Gelder, Marleen M. H. J.
Smits, Luc J. M.
External validation and clinical utility of prognostic prediction models for gestational diabetes mellitus: A prospective cohort study
title External validation and clinical utility of prognostic prediction models for gestational diabetes mellitus: A prospective cohort study
title_full External validation and clinical utility of prognostic prediction models for gestational diabetes mellitus: A prospective cohort study
title_fullStr External validation and clinical utility of prognostic prediction models for gestational diabetes mellitus: A prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed External validation and clinical utility of prognostic prediction models for gestational diabetes mellitus: A prospective cohort study
title_short External validation and clinical utility of prognostic prediction models for gestational diabetes mellitus: A prospective cohort study
title_sort external validation and clinical utility of prognostic prediction models for gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study
topic Pregnancy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7317858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31955406
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13811
work_keys_str_mv AT meertenslindaje externalvalidationandclinicalutilityofprognosticpredictionmodelsforgestationaldiabetesmellitusaprospectivecohortstudy
AT scheepershubertinacj externalvalidationandclinicalutilityofprognosticpredictionmodelsforgestationaldiabetesmellitusaprospectivecohortstudy
AT vankuijksandermj externalvalidationandclinicalutilityofprognosticpredictionmodelsforgestationaldiabetesmellitusaprospectivecohortstudy
AT roeleveldnel externalvalidationandclinicalutilityofprognosticpredictionmodelsforgestationaldiabetesmellitusaprospectivecohortstudy
AT aardenburgrobert externalvalidationandclinicalutilityofprognosticpredictionmodelsforgestationaldiabetesmellitusaprospectivecohortstudy
AT vandoorenivoma externalvalidationandclinicalutilityofprognosticpredictionmodelsforgestationaldiabetesmellitusaprospectivecohortstudy
AT langenveldjosje externalvalidationandclinicalutilityofprognosticpredictionmodelsforgestationaldiabetesmellitusaprospectivecohortstudy
AT zwaanirism externalvalidationandclinicalutilityofprognosticpredictionmodelsforgestationaldiabetesmellitusaprospectivecohortstudy
AT spaandermanmarcea externalvalidationandclinicalutilityofprognosticpredictionmodelsforgestationaldiabetesmellitusaprospectivecohortstudy
AT vangeldermarleenmhj externalvalidationandclinicalutilityofprognosticpredictionmodelsforgestationaldiabetesmellitusaprospectivecohortstudy
AT smitslucjm externalvalidationandclinicalutilityofprognosticpredictionmodelsforgestationaldiabetesmellitusaprospectivecohortstudy