Cargando…
External validation and clinical utility of prognostic prediction models for gestational diabetes mellitus: A prospective cohort study
INTRODUCTION: We performed an independent validation study of all published first trimester prediction models, containing non‐invasive predictors, for the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. Furthermore, the clinical potential of the best performing models was evaluated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sys...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7317858/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31955406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13811 |
_version_ | 1783550723344039936 |
---|---|
author | Meertens, Linda J. E. Scheepers, Hubertina C. J. van Kuijk, Sander M. J. Roeleveld, Nel Aardenburg, Robert van Dooren, Ivo M. A. Langenveld, Josje Zwaan, Iris M. Spaanderman, Marc E. A. van Gelder, Marleen M. H. J. Smits, Luc J. M. |
author_facet | Meertens, Linda J. E. Scheepers, Hubertina C. J. van Kuijk, Sander M. J. Roeleveld, Nel Aardenburg, Robert van Dooren, Ivo M. A. Langenveld, Josje Zwaan, Iris M. Spaanderman, Marc E. A. van Gelder, Marleen M. H. J. Smits, Luc J. M. |
author_sort | Meertens, Linda J. E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: We performed an independent validation study of all published first trimester prediction models, containing non‐invasive predictors, for the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. Furthermore, the clinical potential of the best performing models was evaluated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Systemically selected prediction models from the literature were validated in a Dutch prospective cohort using data from Expect Study I and PRIDE Study. The predictive performance of the models was evaluated by discrimination and calibration. Clinical utility was assessed using decision curve analysis. Screening performance measures were calculated at different risk thresholds for the best model and compared with current selective screening strategies. RESULTS: The validation cohort included 5260 women. Gestational diabetes mellitus was diagnosed in 127 women (2.4%). The discriminative performance of the 12 included models ranged from 68% to 75%. Nearly all models overestimated the risk. After recalibration, agreement between the observed outcomes and predicted probabilities improved for most models. CONCLUSIONS: The best performing prediction models showed acceptable performance measures and may enable more personalized medicine‐based antenatal care for women at risk of developing gestational diabetes mellitus compared with current applied strategies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7317858 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73178582020-06-29 External validation and clinical utility of prognostic prediction models for gestational diabetes mellitus: A prospective cohort study Meertens, Linda J. E. Scheepers, Hubertina C. J. van Kuijk, Sander M. J. Roeleveld, Nel Aardenburg, Robert van Dooren, Ivo M. A. Langenveld, Josje Zwaan, Iris M. Spaanderman, Marc E. A. van Gelder, Marleen M. H. J. Smits, Luc J. M. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Pregnancy INTRODUCTION: We performed an independent validation study of all published first trimester prediction models, containing non‐invasive predictors, for the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. Furthermore, the clinical potential of the best performing models was evaluated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Systemically selected prediction models from the literature were validated in a Dutch prospective cohort using data from Expect Study I and PRIDE Study. The predictive performance of the models was evaluated by discrimination and calibration. Clinical utility was assessed using decision curve analysis. Screening performance measures were calculated at different risk thresholds for the best model and compared with current selective screening strategies. RESULTS: The validation cohort included 5260 women. Gestational diabetes mellitus was diagnosed in 127 women (2.4%). The discriminative performance of the 12 included models ranged from 68% to 75%. Nearly all models overestimated the risk. After recalibration, agreement between the observed outcomes and predicted probabilities improved for most models. CONCLUSIONS: The best performing prediction models showed acceptable performance measures and may enable more personalized medicine‐based antenatal care for women at risk of developing gestational diabetes mellitus compared with current applied strategies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-02-14 2020-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7317858/ /pubmed/31955406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13811 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG) This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Pregnancy Meertens, Linda J. E. Scheepers, Hubertina C. J. van Kuijk, Sander M. J. Roeleveld, Nel Aardenburg, Robert van Dooren, Ivo M. A. Langenveld, Josje Zwaan, Iris M. Spaanderman, Marc E. A. van Gelder, Marleen M. H. J. Smits, Luc J. M. External validation and clinical utility of prognostic prediction models for gestational diabetes mellitus: A prospective cohort study |
title | External validation and clinical utility of prognostic prediction models for gestational diabetes mellitus: A prospective cohort study |
title_full | External validation and clinical utility of prognostic prediction models for gestational diabetes mellitus: A prospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | External validation and clinical utility of prognostic prediction models for gestational diabetes mellitus: A prospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | External validation and clinical utility of prognostic prediction models for gestational diabetes mellitus: A prospective cohort study |
title_short | External validation and clinical utility of prognostic prediction models for gestational diabetes mellitus: A prospective cohort study |
title_sort | external validation and clinical utility of prognostic prediction models for gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study |
topic | Pregnancy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7317858/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31955406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13811 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meertenslindaje externalvalidationandclinicalutilityofprognosticpredictionmodelsforgestationaldiabetesmellitusaprospectivecohortstudy AT scheepershubertinacj externalvalidationandclinicalutilityofprognosticpredictionmodelsforgestationaldiabetesmellitusaprospectivecohortstudy AT vankuijksandermj externalvalidationandclinicalutilityofprognosticpredictionmodelsforgestationaldiabetesmellitusaprospectivecohortstudy AT roeleveldnel externalvalidationandclinicalutilityofprognosticpredictionmodelsforgestationaldiabetesmellitusaprospectivecohortstudy AT aardenburgrobert externalvalidationandclinicalutilityofprognosticpredictionmodelsforgestationaldiabetesmellitusaprospectivecohortstudy AT vandoorenivoma externalvalidationandclinicalutilityofprognosticpredictionmodelsforgestationaldiabetesmellitusaprospectivecohortstudy AT langenveldjosje externalvalidationandclinicalutilityofprognosticpredictionmodelsforgestationaldiabetesmellitusaprospectivecohortstudy AT zwaanirism externalvalidationandclinicalutilityofprognosticpredictionmodelsforgestationaldiabetesmellitusaprospectivecohortstudy AT spaandermanmarcea externalvalidationandclinicalutilityofprognosticpredictionmodelsforgestationaldiabetesmellitusaprospectivecohortstudy AT vangeldermarleenmhj externalvalidationandclinicalutilityofprognosticpredictionmodelsforgestationaldiabetesmellitusaprospectivecohortstudy AT smitslucjm externalvalidationandclinicalutilityofprognosticpredictionmodelsforgestationaldiabetesmellitusaprospectivecohortstudy |