Cargando…
Response of UK interventional radiologists to the COVID-19 pandemic – survey findings
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has had an unprecedented effect upon the National Health Service (NHS). Like other specialties, Interventional Radiology (IR) rapidly adapted to the evolving situation. Members of BSIR were surveyed to obtain a snapshot of the experiences of UK IRs in response to CO...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7317887/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32592080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42155-020-00133-2 |
_version_ | 1783550729973137408 |
---|---|
author | Rostampour, Sammy Cleveland, Trevor White, Hilary Haslam, Philip McCafferty, Ian Hamady, Mo |
author_facet | Rostampour, Sammy Cleveland, Trevor White, Hilary Haslam, Philip McCafferty, Ian Hamady, Mo |
author_sort | Rostampour, Sammy |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has had an unprecedented effect upon the National Health Service (NHS). Like other specialties, Interventional Radiology (IR) rapidly adapted to the evolving situation. Members of BSIR were surveyed to obtain a snapshot of the experiences of UK IRs in response to COVID-19. An electronic survey was compiled using Google Forms, approved by the BSIR Council Officers and distributed to BSIR members by email on 18 (th) April 2020. A total of 228 responses were received. The survey was open for a 14-day period and the data analysed in Microsoft Excel 365. The response rate was 29% (228/800). RESULTS: Two thirds of respondents work in a Tertiary unit and 33% deliver IR in a District Hospital. 84% have a day-case facility. After the COVID-19 crisis, 81% of respondents were able to maintain 24–7 On-call service. 59% of respondents had been required change their day to day practice to allow the on-call service to continue. 55% of respondents were involved in providing a central line service. Of those questioned, 91% continued to offer endovascular services, 98% genitourinary and 92% hepatobiliary services, although a degree of service reduction was described. 38% have provided IR trainees with additional training material during this pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: This survey has confirmed that the responses of UK IR departments to the COVID-19 crisis have ensured vital on-call and urgent services have continued, including ongoing availability of most IR sub-specialties. Availability of a day case facility has possibly influenced the positive response. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7317887 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73178872020-06-26 Response of UK interventional radiologists to the COVID-19 pandemic – survey findings Rostampour, Sammy Cleveland, Trevor White, Hilary Haslam, Philip McCafferty, Ian Hamady, Mo CVIR Endovasc Original Article BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has had an unprecedented effect upon the National Health Service (NHS). Like other specialties, Interventional Radiology (IR) rapidly adapted to the evolving situation. Members of BSIR were surveyed to obtain a snapshot of the experiences of UK IRs in response to COVID-19. An electronic survey was compiled using Google Forms, approved by the BSIR Council Officers and distributed to BSIR members by email on 18 (th) April 2020. A total of 228 responses were received. The survey was open for a 14-day period and the data analysed in Microsoft Excel 365. The response rate was 29% (228/800). RESULTS: Two thirds of respondents work in a Tertiary unit and 33% deliver IR in a District Hospital. 84% have a day-case facility. After the COVID-19 crisis, 81% of respondents were able to maintain 24–7 On-call service. 59% of respondents had been required change their day to day practice to allow the on-call service to continue. 55% of respondents were involved in providing a central line service. Of those questioned, 91% continued to offer endovascular services, 98% genitourinary and 92% hepatobiliary services, although a degree of service reduction was described. 38% have provided IR trainees with additional training material during this pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: This survey has confirmed that the responses of UK IR departments to the COVID-19 crisis have ensured vital on-call and urgent services have continued, including ongoing availability of most IR sub-specialties. Availability of a day case facility has possibly influenced the positive response. Springer International Publishing 2020-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7317887/ /pubmed/32592080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42155-020-00133-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Rostampour, Sammy Cleveland, Trevor White, Hilary Haslam, Philip McCafferty, Ian Hamady, Mo Response of UK interventional radiologists to the COVID-19 pandemic – survey findings |
title | Response of UK interventional radiologists to the COVID-19 pandemic – survey findings |
title_full | Response of UK interventional radiologists to the COVID-19 pandemic – survey findings |
title_fullStr | Response of UK interventional radiologists to the COVID-19 pandemic – survey findings |
title_full_unstemmed | Response of UK interventional radiologists to the COVID-19 pandemic – survey findings |
title_short | Response of UK interventional radiologists to the COVID-19 pandemic – survey findings |
title_sort | response of uk interventional radiologists to the covid-19 pandemic – survey findings |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7317887/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32592080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42155-020-00133-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rostampoursammy responseofukinterventionalradiologiststothecovid19pandemicsurveyfindings AT clevelandtrevor responseofukinterventionalradiologiststothecovid19pandemicsurveyfindings AT whitehilary responseofukinterventionalradiologiststothecovid19pandemicsurveyfindings AT haslamphilip responseofukinterventionalradiologiststothecovid19pandemicsurveyfindings AT mccaffertyian responseofukinterventionalradiologiststothecovid19pandemicsurveyfindings AT hamadymo responseofukinterventionalradiologiststothecovid19pandemicsurveyfindings |