Cargando…

Quantitizing findings from qualitative studies for integration in mixed methods reviewing

In mixed methods reviewing, data from quantitative and qualitative studies are combined at the review level. One possible way to combine findings of quantitative and qualitative studies is to quantitize qualitative findings prior to their incorporation in a quantitative review. There are only a few...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Grootel, Leonie, Balachandran Nair, Lakshmi, Klugkist, Irene, van Wesel, Floryt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7317911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32104971
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1403
_version_ 1783550735868231680
author van Grootel, Leonie
Balachandran Nair, Lakshmi
Klugkist, Irene
van Wesel, Floryt
author_facet van Grootel, Leonie
Balachandran Nair, Lakshmi
Klugkist, Irene
van Wesel, Floryt
author_sort van Grootel, Leonie
collection PubMed
description In mixed methods reviewing, data from quantitative and qualitative studies are combined at the review level. One possible way to combine findings of quantitative and qualitative studies is to quantitize qualitative findings prior to their incorporation in a quantitative review. There are only a few examples of the quantification of qualitative findings within this context. This study adds to current research on mixed methods review methodology by reporting the pilot implementation of a new four‐step quantitizing approach. We report how we extract and quantitize the strength of relationships found in qualitative studies by assigning correlations to vague quantifiers in text fragments. This article describes (a) how the analysis is prepared; (b) how vague quantifiers in text fragments are organized and transformed to numerical values; (c) how qualitative studies as a whole are assigned effect sizes; and (d) how the overall mean effects size and variance can be calculated. The pilot implementation shows how findings from 26 primary qualitative studies are transformed into mean effect sizes and corresponding variances.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7317911
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73179112020-06-29 Quantitizing findings from qualitative studies for integration in mixed methods reviewing van Grootel, Leonie Balachandran Nair, Lakshmi Klugkist, Irene van Wesel, Floryt Res Synth Methods Research Articles In mixed methods reviewing, data from quantitative and qualitative studies are combined at the review level. One possible way to combine findings of quantitative and qualitative studies is to quantitize qualitative findings prior to their incorporation in a quantitative review. There are only a few examples of the quantification of qualitative findings within this context. This study adds to current research on mixed methods review methodology by reporting the pilot implementation of a new four‐step quantitizing approach. We report how we extract and quantitize the strength of relationships found in qualitative studies by assigning correlations to vague quantifiers in text fragments. This article describes (a) how the analysis is prepared; (b) how vague quantifiers in text fragments are organized and transformed to numerical values; (c) how qualitative studies as a whole are assigned effect sizes; and (d) how the overall mean effects size and variance can be calculated. The pilot implementation shows how findings from 26 primary qualitative studies are transformed into mean effect sizes and corresponding variances. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-03-15 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7317911/ /pubmed/32104971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1403 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Research Synthesis Methods published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
van Grootel, Leonie
Balachandran Nair, Lakshmi
Klugkist, Irene
van Wesel, Floryt
Quantitizing findings from qualitative studies for integration in mixed methods reviewing
title Quantitizing findings from qualitative studies for integration in mixed methods reviewing
title_full Quantitizing findings from qualitative studies for integration in mixed methods reviewing
title_fullStr Quantitizing findings from qualitative studies for integration in mixed methods reviewing
title_full_unstemmed Quantitizing findings from qualitative studies for integration in mixed methods reviewing
title_short Quantitizing findings from qualitative studies for integration in mixed methods reviewing
title_sort quantitizing findings from qualitative studies for integration in mixed methods reviewing
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7317911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32104971
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1403
work_keys_str_mv AT vangrootelleonie quantitizingfindingsfromqualitativestudiesforintegrationinmixedmethodsreviewing
AT balachandrannairlakshmi quantitizingfindingsfromqualitativestudiesforintegrationinmixedmethodsreviewing
AT klugkistirene quantitizingfindingsfromqualitativestudiesforintegrationinmixedmethodsreviewing
AT vanweselfloryt quantitizingfindingsfromqualitativestudiesforintegrationinmixedmethodsreviewing