Cargando…

Invasive Motor Cortex Stimulation Influences Intracerebral Structures in Patients With Neuropathic Pain: An Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta‐Analysis of Imaging Data

OBJECTIVE: Invasive motor cortex stimulation (iMCS) has been proposed as a treatment for intractable neuropathic pain syndromes. Although the mechanisms underlying the analgesic effect of iMCS remain largely elusive, several studies found iMCS‐related changes in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Volkers, Ruben, Giesen, Esmay, van der Heiden, Maudy, Kerperien, Mijke, Lange, Sibylle, Kurt, Erkan, van Dongen, Robert, Schutter, Dennis, Vissers, Kris C. P., Henssen, Dylan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7317964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32030854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ner.13119
_version_ 1783550749264838656
author Volkers, Ruben
Giesen, Esmay
van der Heiden, Maudy
Kerperien, Mijke
Lange, Sibylle
Kurt, Erkan
van Dongen, Robert
Schutter, Dennis
Vissers, Kris C. P.
Henssen, Dylan
author_facet Volkers, Ruben
Giesen, Esmay
van der Heiden, Maudy
Kerperien, Mijke
Lange, Sibylle
Kurt, Erkan
van Dongen, Robert
Schutter, Dennis
Vissers, Kris C. P.
Henssen, Dylan
author_sort Volkers, Ruben
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Invasive motor cortex stimulation (iMCS) has been proposed as a treatment for intractable neuropathic pain syndromes. Although the mechanisms underlying the analgesic effect of iMCS remain largely elusive, several studies found iMCS‐related changes in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in neuropathic pain patients. The aim of this study was to meta‐analyze the findings of neuroimaging studies on rCBF changes to iMCS. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for retrieval of relevant scientific papers. After initial assessment of relevancy by screening title and abstract by two investigators, independently, predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria were used for final inclusion of papers. Descriptive results were statistically assessed, whereas coordinates were pooled and meta‐analyzed in accordance with the activation likelihood estimation (ALE) methodology. RESULTS: Six studies were included in the systematic narrative analysis, suggesting rCBF increases in the cingulate gyrus, thalamus, insula, and putamen after switching the MCS device “ON” as compared to the “OFF” situation. Decreases in rCBF were found in for example the precentral gyrus and different occipital regions. Two studies did not report stereotactic coordinates and were excluded from further analysis. ALE meta‐analysis showed that, after switching the iMCS electrode “ON,” increased rCBF occurred in the (1) anterior cingulate gyrus; (2) putamen; (3) cerebral peduncle; (4) precentral gyrus; (5) superior frontal gyrus; (6) red nucleus; (7) internal part of the globus pallidus; (8) ventral lateral nucleus of the thalamus; (9) medial frontal gyrus; (10) inferior frontal gyrus; and (11) claustrum, as compared to the “OFF” situation. Reductions in rCBF were found in the posterior cingulate gyrus when the iMCS electrode was turned “OFF.” CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggested that iMCS induces changes in principal components of the default mode‐, the salience‐, and sensorimotor network.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7317964
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73179642020-06-29 Invasive Motor Cortex Stimulation Influences Intracerebral Structures in Patients With Neuropathic Pain: An Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta‐Analysis of Imaging Data Volkers, Ruben Giesen, Esmay van der Heiden, Maudy Kerperien, Mijke Lange, Sibylle Kurt, Erkan van Dongen, Robert Schutter, Dennis Vissers, Kris C. P. Henssen, Dylan Neuromodulation Review Articles OBJECTIVE: Invasive motor cortex stimulation (iMCS) has been proposed as a treatment for intractable neuropathic pain syndromes. Although the mechanisms underlying the analgesic effect of iMCS remain largely elusive, several studies found iMCS‐related changes in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in neuropathic pain patients. The aim of this study was to meta‐analyze the findings of neuroimaging studies on rCBF changes to iMCS. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for retrieval of relevant scientific papers. After initial assessment of relevancy by screening title and abstract by two investigators, independently, predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria were used for final inclusion of papers. Descriptive results were statistically assessed, whereas coordinates were pooled and meta‐analyzed in accordance with the activation likelihood estimation (ALE) methodology. RESULTS: Six studies were included in the systematic narrative analysis, suggesting rCBF increases in the cingulate gyrus, thalamus, insula, and putamen after switching the MCS device “ON” as compared to the “OFF” situation. Decreases in rCBF were found in for example the precentral gyrus and different occipital regions. Two studies did not report stereotactic coordinates and were excluded from further analysis. ALE meta‐analysis showed that, after switching the iMCS electrode “ON,” increased rCBF occurred in the (1) anterior cingulate gyrus; (2) putamen; (3) cerebral peduncle; (4) precentral gyrus; (5) superior frontal gyrus; (6) red nucleus; (7) internal part of the globus pallidus; (8) ventral lateral nucleus of the thalamus; (9) medial frontal gyrus; (10) inferior frontal gyrus; and (11) claustrum, as compared to the “OFF” situation. Reductions in rCBF were found in the posterior cingulate gyrus when the iMCS electrode was turned “OFF.” CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggested that iMCS induces changes in principal components of the default mode‐, the salience‐, and sensorimotor network. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-02-06 2020-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7317964/ /pubmed/32030854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ner.13119 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Neuromodulation Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Volkers, Ruben
Giesen, Esmay
van der Heiden, Maudy
Kerperien, Mijke
Lange, Sibylle
Kurt, Erkan
van Dongen, Robert
Schutter, Dennis
Vissers, Kris C. P.
Henssen, Dylan
Invasive Motor Cortex Stimulation Influences Intracerebral Structures in Patients With Neuropathic Pain: An Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta‐Analysis of Imaging Data
title Invasive Motor Cortex Stimulation Influences Intracerebral Structures in Patients With Neuropathic Pain: An Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta‐Analysis of Imaging Data
title_full Invasive Motor Cortex Stimulation Influences Intracerebral Structures in Patients With Neuropathic Pain: An Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta‐Analysis of Imaging Data
title_fullStr Invasive Motor Cortex Stimulation Influences Intracerebral Structures in Patients With Neuropathic Pain: An Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta‐Analysis of Imaging Data
title_full_unstemmed Invasive Motor Cortex Stimulation Influences Intracerebral Structures in Patients With Neuropathic Pain: An Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta‐Analysis of Imaging Data
title_short Invasive Motor Cortex Stimulation Influences Intracerebral Structures in Patients With Neuropathic Pain: An Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta‐Analysis of Imaging Data
title_sort invasive motor cortex stimulation influences intracerebral structures in patients with neuropathic pain: an activation likelihood estimation meta‐analysis of imaging data
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7317964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32030854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ner.13119
work_keys_str_mv AT volkersruben invasivemotorcortexstimulationinfluencesintracerebralstructuresinpatientswithneuropathicpainanactivationlikelihoodestimationmetaanalysisofimagingdata
AT giesenesmay invasivemotorcortexstimulationinfluencesintracerebralstructuresinpatientswithneuropathicpainanactivationlikelihoodestimationmetaanalysisofimagingdata
AT vanderheidenmaudy invasivemotorcortexstimulationinfluencesintracerebralstructuresinpatientswithneuropathicpainanactivationlikelihoodestimationmetaanalysisofimagingdata
AT kerperienmijke invasivemotorcortexstimulationinfluencesintracerebralstructuresinpatientswithneuropathicpainanactivationlikelihoodestimationmetaanalysisofimagingdata
AT langesibylle invasivemotorcortexstimulationinfluencesintracerebralstructuresinpatientswithneuropathicpainanactivationlikelihoodestimationmetaanalysisofimagingdata
AT kurterkan invasivemotorcortexstimulationinfluencesintracerebralstructuresinpatientswithneuropathicpainanactivationlikelihoodestimationmetaanalysisofimagingdata
AT vandongenrobert invasivemotorcortexstimulationinfluencesintracerebralstructuresinpatientswithneuropathicpainanactivationlikelihoodestimationmetaanalysisofimagingdata
AT schutterdennis invasivemotorcortexstimulationinfluencesintracerebralstructuresinpatientswithneuropathicpainanactivationlikelihoodestimationmetaanalysisofimagingdata
AT visserskriscp invasivemotorcortexstimulationinfluencesintracerebralstructuresinpatientswithneuropathicpainanactivationlikelihoodestimationmetaanalysisofimagingdata
AT henssendylan invasivemotorcortexstimulationinfluencesintracerebralstructuresinpatientswithneuropathicpainanactivationlikelihoodestimationmetaanalysisofimagingdata