Cargando…

Remote ischemic conditioning combined with intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) combined with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). METHODS: Patients with AIS who underwent IVT were enrolled and 1:1 randomized to the R...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Yao‐De, Guo, Zhen‐Ni, Qin, Chen, Jin, Hang, Zhang, Peng, Abuduxukuer, Reziya, Yang, Yi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32472628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acn3.51063
_version_ 1783550767649521664
author He, Yao‐De
Guo, Zhen‐Ni
Qin, Chen
Jin, Hang
Zhang, Peng
Abuduxukuer, Reziya
Yang, Yi
author_facet He, Yao‐De
Guo, Zhen‐Ni
Qin, Chen
Jin, Hang
Zhang, Peng
Abuduxukuer, Reziya
Yang, Yi
author_sort He, Yao‐De
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) combined with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). METHODS: Patients with AIS who underwent IVT were enrolled and 1:1 randomized to the RIC group and sham‐RIC group in this study. RIC (or sham‐RIC) was performed twice within 6–24 h of IVT. The subjects in the two groups were followed up for 90 days. The safety outcome included the ratio of hemorrhagic transformation (HT), adverse events during the follow‐up, blood pressure within the first 24 h after IVT, and laboratory tests 24 h after IVT. The efficacy outcome included the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score during the follow‐up, and level of high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein (hs‐CRP) tested 24 h after IVT. RESULTS: Forty‐nine patients (24 in the RIC group and 25 in the sham‐RIC group) were recruited. No significant difference was observed in the ratio of HT, adverse events, blood pressure, coagulation function or liver function between groups. In addition, there was no significant difference in mRS score and NIHSS score during the follow‐up between groups. However, patients in the RIC group exhibited a significant lower level of hs‐CRP compared with the control group (P = 0.048). INTERPRETATION: RIC combined with IVT is safe in the treatment of AIS. The neuroprotective and anti‐inflammatory effects of this therapy warrant further study on a larger scale.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7318096
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73180962020-06-29 Remote ischemic conditioning combined with intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke He, Yao‐De Guo, Zhen‐Ni Qin, Chen Jin, Hang Zhang, Peng Abuduxukuer, Reziya Yang, Yi Ann Clin Transl Neurol Research Articles OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) combined with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). METHODS: Patients with AIS who underwent IVT were enrolled and 1:1 randomized to the RIC group and sham‐RIC group in this study. RIC (or sham‐RIC) was performed twice within 6–24 h of IVT. The subjects in the two groups were followed up for 90 days. The safety outcome included the ratio of hemorrhagic transformation (HT), adverse events during the follow‐up, blood pressure within the first 24 h after IVT, and laboratory tests 24 h after IVT. The efficacy outcome included the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score during the follow‐up, and level of high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein (hs‐CRP) tested 24 h after IVT. RESULTS: Forty‐nine patients (24 in the RIC group and 25 in the sham‐RIC group) were recruited. No significant difference was observed in the ratio of HT, adverse events, blood pressure, coagulation function or liver function between groups. In addition, there was no significant difference in mRS score and NIHSS score during the follow‐up between groups. However, patients in the RIC group exhibited a significant lower level of hs‐CRP compared with the control group (P = 0.048). INTERPRETATION: RIC combined with IVT is safe in the treatment of AIS. The neuroprotective and anti‐inflammatory effects of this therapy warrant further study on a larger scale. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7318096/ /pubmed/32472628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acn3.51063 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
He, Yao‐De
Guo, Zhen‐Ni
Qin, Chen
Jin, Hang
Zhang, Peng
Abuduxukuer, Reziya
Yang, Yi
Remote ischemic conditioning combined with intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke
title Remote ischemic conditioning combined with intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke
title_full Remote ischemic conditioning combined with intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke
title_fullStr Remote ischemic conditioning combined with intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke
title_full_unstemmed Remote ischemic conditioning combined with intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke
title_short Remote ischemic conditioning combined with intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke
title_sort remote ischemic conditioning combined with intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32472628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acn3.51063
work_keys_str_mv AT heyaode remoteischemicconditioningcombinedwithintravenousthrombolysisforacuteischemicstroke
AT guozhenni remoteischemicconditioningcombinedwithintravenousthrombolysisforacuteischemicstroke
AT qinchen remoteischemicconditioningcombinedwithintravenousthrombolysisforacuteischemicstroke
AT jinhang remoteischemicconditioningcombinedwithintravenousthrombolysisforacuteischemicstroke
AT zhangpeng remoteischemicconditioningcombinedwithintravenousthrombolysisforacuteischemicstroke
AT abuduxukuerreziya remoteischemicconditioningcombinedwithintravenousthrombolysisforacuteischemicstroke
AT yangyi remoteischemicconditioningcombinedwithintravenousthrombolysisforacuteischemicstroke