Cargando…
Quasi‐Saturated Layer: Implications for Estimating Recharge and Groundwater Modeling
This study presents an extension of the concept of “quasi‐saturation” to a quasi‐saturated layer, defined as the uppermost dynamic portion of the saturated zone subject to water table fluctuations. Entrapped air here may cause substantial reductions in the hydraulic conductivity (K) and fillable por...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31187874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12916 |
_version_ | 1783550781771743232 |
---|---|
author | Gonçalves, Roger D. Teramoto, Elias H. Engelbrecht, Bruno Z. Alfaro Soto, Miguel A. Chang, Hung K. van Genuchten, Martinus Th. |
author_facet | Gonçalves, Roger D. Teramoto, Elias H. Engelbrecht, Bruno Z. Alfaro Soto, Miguel A. Chang, Hung K. van Genuchten, Martinus Th. |
author_sort | Gonçalves, Roger D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study presents an extension of the concept of “quasi‐saturation” to a quasi‐saturated layer, defined as the uppermost dynamic portion of the saturated zone subject to water table fluctuations. Entrapped air here may cause substantial reductions in the hydraulic conductivity (K) and fillable pore water. Air entrapment is caused by a rising water table, usually as a result of groundwater recharge. The most significant effects of entrapped air are recharge overestimation based on methods that use specific yield (S (y)), such as the water table fluctuation method (WTF), and reductions in K values. These effects impact estimation of fluid flow velocities and contaminant migration rates in groundwater. In order to quantify actual groundwater recharge rates and the effects of entrapped air, numerical simulations with the FEFLOW (Version 7.0) groundwater flow model were carried out using a quasi‐saturated layer for a pilot area in Rio Claro, Brazil. The calculated recharge rate represented 16% of the average precipitation over an 8‐year period, approximately half of estimates using the WTF method. Air entrapment amounted to a fillable porosity of 0.07, significant lower that the value of 0.17 obtained experimentally for S (y). Numerical results showed that the entrapped air volume in the quasi‐saturated layer can be very significant (0.58 of the air fraction) and hence can significantly affect estimates of groundwater recharge and groundwater flow rates near the water table. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7318159 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73181592020-06-29 Quasi‐Saturated Layer: Implications for Estimating Recharge and Groundwater Modeling Gonçalves, Roger D. Teramoto, Elias H. Engelbrecht, Bruno Z. Alfaro Soto, Miguel A. Chang, Hung K. van Genuchten, Martinus Th. Ground Water Research Papers/ This study presents an extension of the concept of “quasi‐saturation” to a quasi‐saturated layer, defined as the uppermost dynamic portion of the saturated zone subject to water table fluctuations. Entrapped air here may cause substantial reductions in the hydraulic conductivity (K) and fillable pore water. Air entrapment is caused by a rising water table, usually as a result of groundwater recharge. The most significant effects of entrapped air are recharge overestimation based on methods that use specific yield (S (y)), such as the water table fluctuation method (WTF), and reductions in K values. These effects impact estimation of fluid flow velocities and contaminant migration rates in groundwater. In order to quantify actual groundwater recharge rates and the effects of entrapped air, numerical simulations with the FEFLOW (Version 7.0) groundwater flow model were carried out using a quasi‐saturated layer for a pilot area in Rio Claro, Brazil. The calculated recharge rate represented 16% of the average precipitation over an 8‐year period, approximately half of estimates using the WTF method. Air entrapment amounted to a fillable porosity of 0.07, significant lower that the value of 0.17 obtained experimentally for S (y). Numerical results showed that the entrapped air volume in the quasi‐saturated layer can be very significant (0.58 of the air fraction) and hence can significantly affect estimates of groundwater recharge and groundwater flow rates near the water table. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2019-07-05 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7318159/ /pubmed/31187874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12916 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Groundwater published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of National Ground Water Association. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Papers/ Gonçalves, Roger D. Teramoto, Elias H. Engelbrecht, Bruno Z. Alfaro Soto, Miguel A. Chang, Hung K. van Genuchten, Martinus Th. Quasi‐Saturated Layer: Implications for Estimating Recharge and Groundwater Modeling |
title | Quasi‐Saturated Layer: Implications for Estimating Recharge and Groundwater Modeling |
title_full | Quasi‐Saturated Layer: Implications for Estimating Recharge and Groundwater Modeling |
title_fullStr | Quasi‐Saturated Layer: Implications for Estimating Recharge and Groundwater Modeling |
title_full_unstemmed | Quasi‐Saturated Layer: Implications for Estimating Recharge and Groundwater Modeling |
title_short | Quasi‐Saturated Layer: Implications for Estimating Recharge and Groundwater Modeling |
title_sort | quasi‐saturated layer: implications for estimating recharge and groundwater modeling |
topic | Research Papers/ |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31187874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12916 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goncalvesrogerd quasisaturatedlayerimplicationsforestimatingrechargeandgroundwatermodeling AT teramotoeliash quasisaturatedlayerimplicationsforestimatingrechargeandgroundwatermodeling AT engelbrechtbrunoz quasisaturatedlayerimplicationsforestimatingrechargeandgroundwatermodeling AT alfarosotomiguela quasisaturatedlayerimplicationsforestimatingrechargeandgroundwatermodeling AT changhungk quasisaturatedlayerimplicationsforestimatingrechargeandgroundwatermodeling AT vangenuchtenmartinusth quasisaturatedlayerimplicationsforestimatingrechargeandgroundwatermodeling |