Cargando…
Boundary line models for soil nutrient concentrations and wheat yield in national‐scale datasets
In boundary line analysis a biological response (e.g., crop yield) is assumed to be a function of a variable (e.g., soil nutrient concentration), which limits the response in only some subset of observations because other limiting factors also apply. The response function is therefore expressed by a...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318209/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32612447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12891 |
_version_ | 1783550793913204736 |
---|---|
author | Lark, Richard M. Gillingham, Vincent Langton, David Marchant, Ben P. |
author_facet | Lark, Richard M. Gillingham, Vincent Langton, David Marchant, Ben P. |
author_sort | Lark, Richard M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In boundary line analysis a biological response (e.g., crop yield) is assumed to be a function of a variable (e.g., soil nutrient concentration), which limits the response in only some subset of observations because other limiting factors also apply. The response function is therefore expressed by an upper boundary of the plot of the response against the variable. This model has been used in various branches of soil science. In this paper we apply it to the analysis of some large datasets, originating from commercial farms in England and Wales, on the recorded yield of wheat and measured concentrations of soil nutrients in within‐field soil management zones. We considered boundary line models for the effects of potassium (K), phosphorus (P) and magnesium (Mg) on yield, comparing the model with a simple bivariate normal distribution or a bivariate normal censored at a constant maximum yield. We were able to show, using likelihood‐based methods, that the boundary line model was preferable in most cases. The boundary line model suggested that the standard RB209 soil nutrient index values (Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board, nutrient management guide (RB209), 2017) are robust and apply at the within‐field scale. However, there was evidence that wheat yield could respond to additional Mg at concentrations above index 0, contrary to RB209 guidelines. Furthermore, there was evidence that the boundary line model for yield and P differs between soils at different pH and depth intervals, suggesting that shallow soils with larger pH require a larger target P index than others. HIGHLIGHTS: Boundary line analysis is one way to examine how soil variables influence crop yield in large datasets. We showed that boundary line models could be applied to large datasets on soil nutrients and crop yield. The resulting models are consistent with current practice for P and K, but not for Mg. Models suggest that more refined recommendations for P requirement could be based on soil pH and depth. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7318209 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73182092020-06-29 Boundary line models for soil nutrient concentrations and wheat yield in national‐scale datasets Lark, Richard M. Gillingham, Vincent Langton, David Marchant, Ben P. Eur J Soil Sci Soil Development, Variation and Characterisation In boundary line analysis a biological response (e.g., crop yield) is assumed to be a function of a variable (e.g., soil nutrient concentration), which limits the response in only some subset of observations because other limiting factors also apply. The response function is therefore expressed by an upper boundary of the plot of the response against the variable. This model has been used in various branches of soil science. In this paper we apply it to the analysis of some large datasets, originating from commercial farms in England and Wales, on the recorded yield of wheat and measured concentrations of soil nutrients in within‐field soil management zones. We considered boundary line models for the effects of potassium (K), phosphorus (P) and magnesium (Mg) on yield, comparing the model with a simple bivariate normal distribution or a bivariate normal censored at a constant maximum yield. We were able to show, using likelihood‐based methods, that the boundary line model was preferable in most cases. The boundary line model suggested that the standard RB209 soil nutrient index values (Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board, nutrient management guide (RB209), 2017) are robust and apply at the within‐field scale. However, there was evidence that wheat yield could respond to additional Mg at concentrations above index 0, contrary to RB209 guidelines. Furthermore, there was evidence that the boundary line model for yield and P differs between soils at different pH and depth intervals, suggesting that shallow soils with larger pH require a larger target P index than others. HIGHLIGHTS: Boundary line analysis is one way to examine how soil variables influence crop yield in large datasets. We showed that boundary line models could be applied to large datasets on soil nutrients and crop yield. The resulting models are consistent with current practice for P and K, but not for Mg. Models suggest that more refined recommendations for P requirement could be based on soil pH and depth. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2019-11-15 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7318209/ /pubmed/32612447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12891 Text en © 2019 The Authors. European Journal of Soil Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Society of Soil Science. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Soil Development, Variation and Characterisation Lark, Richard M. Gillingham, Vincent Langton, David Marchant, Ben P. Boundary line models for soil nutrient concentrations and wheat yield in national‐scale datasets |
title | Boundary line models for soil nutrient concentrations and wheat yield in national‐scale datasets |
title_full | Boundary line models for soil nutrient concentrations and wheat yield in national‐scale datasets |
title_fullStr | Boundary line models for soil nutrient concentrations and wheat yield in national‐scale datasets |
title_full_unstemmed | Boundary line models for soil nutrient concentrations and wheat yield in national‐scale datasets |
title_short | Boundary line models for soil nutrient concentrations and wheat yield in national‐scale datasets |
title_sort | boundary line models for soil nutrient concentrations and wheat yield in national‐scale datasets |
topic | Soil Development, Variation and Characterisation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318209/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32612447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12891 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT larkrichardm boundarylinemodelsforsoilnutrientconcentrationsandwheatyieldinnationalscaledatasets AT gillinghamvincent boundarylinemodelsforsoilnutrientconcentrationsandwheatyieldinnationalscaledatasets AT langtondavid boundarylinemodelsforsoilnutrientconcentrationsandwheatyieldinnationalscaledatasets AT marchantbenp boundarylinemodelsforsoilnutrientconcentrationsandwheatyieldinnationalscaledatasets |