Cargando…

Boundary line models for soil nutrient concentrations and wheat yield in national‐scale datasets

In boundary line analysis a biological response (e.g., crop yield) is assumed to be a function of a variable (e.g., soil nutrient concentration), which limits the response in only some subset of observations because other limiting factors also apply. The response function is therefore expressed by a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lark, Richard M., Gillingham, Vincent, Langton, David, Marchant, Ben P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32612447
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12891
_version_ 1783550793913204736
author Lark, Richard M.
Gillingham, Vincent
Langton, David
Marchant, Ben P.
author_facet Lark, Richard M.
Gillingham, Vincent
Langton, David
Marchant, Ben P.
author_sort Lark, Richard M.
collection PubMed
description In boundary line analysis a biological response (e.g., crop yield) is assumed to be a function of a variable (e.g., soil nutrient concentration), which limits the response in only some subset of observations because other limiting factors also apply. The response function is therefore expressed by an upper boundary of the plot of the response against the variable. This model has been used in various branches of soil science. In this paper we apply it to the analysis of some large datasets, originating from commercial farms in England and Wales, on the recorded yield of wheat and measured concentrations of soil nutrients in within‐field soil management zones. We considered boundary line models for the effects of potassium (K), phosphorus (P) and magnesium (Mg) on yield, comparing the model with a simple bivariate normal distribution or a bivariate normal censored at a constant maximum yield. We were able to show, using likelihood‐based methods, that the boundary line model was preferable in most cases. The boundary line model suggested that the standard RB209 soil nutrient index values (Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board, nutrient management guide (RB209), 2017) are robust and apply at the within‐field scale. However, there was evidence that wheat yield could respond to additional Mg at concentrations above index 0, contrary to RB209 guidelines. Furthermore, there was evidence that the boundary line model for yield and P differs between soils at different pH and depth intervals, suggesting that shallow soils with larger pH require a larger target P index than others. HIGHLIGHTS: Boundary line analysis is one way to examine how soil variables influence crop yield in large datasets. We showed that boundary line models could be applied to large datasets on soil nutrients and crop yield. The resulting models are consistent with current practice for P and K, but not for Mg. Models suggest that more refined recommendations for P requirement could be based on soil pH and depth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7318209
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73182092020-06-29 Boundary line models for soil nutrient concentrations and wheat yield in national‐scale datasets Lark, Richard M. Gillingham, Vincent Langton, David Marchant, Ben P. Eur J Soil Sci Soil Development, Variation and Characterisation In boundary line analysis a biological response (e.g., crop yield) is assumed to be a function of a variable (e.g., soil nutrient concentration), which limits the response in only some subset of observations because other limiting factors also apply. The response function is therefore expressed by an upper boundary of the plot of the response against the variable. This model has been used in various branches of soil science. In this paper we apply it to the analysis of some large datasets, originating from commercial farms in England and Wales, on the recorded yield of wheat and measured concentrations of soil nutrients in within‐field soil management zones. We considered boundary line models for the effects of potassium (K), phosphorus (P) and magnesium (Mg) on yield, comparing the model with a simple bivariate normal distribution or a bivariate normal censored at a constant maximum yield. We were able to show, using likelihood‐based methods, that the boundary line model was preferable in most cases. The boundary line model suggested that the standard RB209 soil nutrient index values (Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board, nutrient management guide (RB209), 2017) are robust and apply at the within‐field scale. However, there was evidence that wheat yield could respond to additional Mg at concentrations above index 0, contrary to RB209 guidelines. Furthermore, there was evidence that the boundary line model for yield and P differs between soils at different pH and depth intervals, suggesting that shallow soils with larger pH require a larger target P index than others. HIGHLIGHTS: Boundary line analysis is one way to examine how soil variables influence crop yield in large datasets. We showed that boundary line models could be applied to large datasets on soil nutrients and crop yield. The resulting models are consistent with current practice for P and K, but not for Mg. Models suggest that more refined recommendations for P requirement could be based on soil pH and depth. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2019-11-15 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7318209/ /pubmed/32612447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12891 Text en © 2019 The Authors. European Journal of Soil Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Society of Soil Science. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Soil Development, Variation and Characterisation
Lark, Richard M.
Gillingham, Vincent
Langton, David
Marchant, Ben P.
Boundary line models for soil nutrient concentrations and wheat yield in national‐scale datasets
title Boundary line models for soil nutrient concentrations and wheat yield in national‐scale datasets
title_full Boundary line models for soil nutrient concentrations and wheat yield in national‐scale datasets
title_fullStr Boundary line models for soil nutrient concentrations and wheat yield in national‐scale datasets
title_full_unstemmed Boundary line models for soil nutrient concentrations and wheat yield in national‐scale datasets
title_short Boundary line models for soil nutrient concentrations and wheat yield in national‐scale datasets
title_sort boundary line models for soil nutrient concentrations and wheat yield in national‐scale datasets
topic Soil Development, Variation and Characterisation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32612447
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12891
work_keys_str_mv AT larkrichardm boundarylinemodelsforsoilnutrientconcentrationsandwheatyieldinnationalscaledatasets
AT gillinghamvincent boundarylinemodelsforsoilnutrientconcentrationsandwheatyieldinnationalscaledatasets
AT langtondavid boundarylinemodelsforsoilnutrientconcentrationsandwheatyieldinnationalscaledatasets
AT marchantbenp boundarylinemodelsforsoilnutrientconcentrationsandwheatyieldinnationalscaledatasets