Cargando…

Artificial intelligence‐based clinical decision support in modern medical physics: Selection, acceptance, commissioning, and quality assurance

BACKGROUND: Recent advances in machine and deep learning based on an increased availability of clinical data have fueled renewed interest in computerized clinical decision support systems (CDSSs). CDSSs have shown great potential to improve healthcare, increase patient safety and reduce costs. Howev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahadevaiah, Geetha, RV, Prasad, Bermejo, Inigo, Jaffray, David, Dekker, Andre, Wee, Leonard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32418341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.13562
_version_ 1783550797205733376
author Mahadevaiah, Geetha
RV, Prasad
Bermejo, Inigo
Jaffray, David
Dekker, Andre
Wee, Leonard
author_facet Mahadevaiah, Geetha
RV, Prasad
Bermejo, Inigo
Jaffray, David
Dekker, Andre
Wee, Leonard
author_sort Mahadevaiah, Geetha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent advances in machine and deep learning based on an increased availability of clinical data have fueled renewed interest in computerized clinical decision support systems (CDSSs). CDSSs have shown great potential to improve healthcare, increase patient safety and reduce costs. However, the use of CDSSs is not without pitfalls, as an inadequate or faulty CDSS can potentially deteriorate the quality of healthcare and put patients at risk. In addition, the adoption of a CDSS might fail because its intended users ignore the output of the CDSS due to lack of trust, relevancy or actionability. AIM: In this article, we provide guidance based on literature for the different aspects involved in the adoption of a CDSS with a special focus on machine and deep learning based systems: selection, acceptance testing, commissioning, implementation and quality assurance. RESULTS: A rigorous selection process will help identify the CDSS that best fits the preferences and requirements of the local site. Acceptance testing will make sure that the selected CDSS fulfills the defined specifications and satisfies the safety requirements. The commissioning process will prepare the CDSS for safe clinical use at the local site. An effective implementation phase should result in an orderly roll out of the CDSS to the well‐trained end‐users whose expectations have been managed. And finally, quality assurance will make sure that the performance of the CDSS is maintained and that any issues are promptly identified and solved. CONCLUSION: We conclude that a systematic approach to the adoption of a CDSS will help avoid pitfalls, improve patient safety and increase the chances of success.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7318221
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73182212020-06-29 Artificial intelligence‐based clinical decision support in modern medical physics: Selection, acceptance, commissioning, and quality assurance Mahadevaiah, Geetha RV, Prasad Bermejo, Inigo Jaffray, David Dekker, Andre Wee, Leonard Med Phys Special Issue: The Role of Machine Learning in Modern Medical Physics BACKGROUND: Recent advances in machine and deep learning based on an increased availability of clinical data have fueled renewed interest in computerized clinical decision support systems (CDSSs). CDSSs have shown great potential to improve healthcare, increase patient safety and reduce costs. However, the use of CDSSs is not without pitfalls, as an inadequate or faulty CDSS can potentially deteriorate the quality of healthcare and put patients at risk. In addition, the adoption of a CDSS might fail because its intended users ignore the output of the CDSS due to lack of trust, relevancy or actionability. AIM: In this article, we provide guidance based on literature for the different aspects involved in the adoption of a CDSS with a special focus on machine and deep learning based systems: selection, acceptance testing, commissioning, implementation and quality assurance. RESULTS: A rigorous selection process will help identify the CDSS that best fits the preferences and requirements of the local site. Acceptance testing will make sure that the selected CDSS fulfills the defined specifications and satisfies the safety requirements. The commissioning process will prepare the CDSS for safe clinical use at the local site. An effective implementation phase should result in an orderly roll out of the CDSS to the well‐trained end‐users whose expectations have been managed. And finally, quality assurance will make sure that the performance of the CDSS is maintained and that any issues are promptly identified and solved. CONCLUSION: We conclude that a systematic approach to the adoption of a CDSS will help avoid pitfalls, improve patient safety and increase the chances of success. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-05-17 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7318221/ /pubmed/32418341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.13562 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Special Issue: The Role of Machine Learning in Modern Medical Physics
Mahadevaiah, Geetha
RV, Prasad
Bermejo, Inigo
Jaffray, David
Dekker, Andre
Wee, Leonard
Artificial intelligence‐based clinical decision support in modern medical physics: Selection, acceptance, commissioning, and quality assurance
title Artificial intelligence‐based clinical decision support in modern medical physics: Selection, acceptance, commissioning, and quality assurance
title_full Artificial intelligence‐based clinical decision support in modern medical physics: Selection, acceptance, commissioning, and quality assurance
title_fullStr Artificial intelligence‐based clinical decision support in modern medical physics: Selection, acceptance, commissioning, and quality assurance
title_full_unstemmed Artificial intelligence‐based clinical decision support in modern medical physics: Selection, acceptance, commissioning, and quality assurance
title_short Artificial intelligence‐based clinical decision support in modern medical physics: Selection, acceptance, commissioning, and quality assurance
title_sort artificial intelligence‐based clinical decision support in modern medical physics: selection, acceptance, commissioning, and quality assurance
topic Special Issue: The Role of Machine Learning in Modern Medical Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32418341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.13562
work_keys_str_mv AT mahadevaiahgeetha artificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportinmodernmedicalphysicsselectionacceptancecommissioningandqualityassurance
AT rvprasad artificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportinmodernmedicalphysicsselectionacceptancecommissioningandqualityassurance
AT bermejoinigo artificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportinmodernmedicalphysicsselectionacceptancecommissioningandqualityassurance
AT jaffraydavid artificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportinmodernmedicalphysicsselectionacceptancecommissioningandqualityassurance
AT dekkerandre artificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportinmodernmedicalphysicsselectionacceptancecommissioningandqualityassurance
AT weeleonard artificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportinmodernmedicalphysicsselectionacceptancecommissioningandqualityassurance