Cargando…

Lowering the cutoff value for increment increases the sensitivity for the diagnosis of Lambert‐Eaton myasthenic syndrome

BACKGROUND: Increment of compound muscle action potential amplitude is a diagnostic hallmark of Lambert‐Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS). Making a diagnosis can be challenging, therefore, a proper cutoff for abnormal increment is highly relevant for improved recognition of this rare disease. METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lipka, Alexander F., Titulaer, Maarten J., Tannemaat, Martijn R., Verschuuren, Jan J.G.M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32291768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mus.26885
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Increment of compound muscle action potential amplitude is a diagnostic hallmark of Lambert‐Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS). Making a diagnosis can be challenging, therefore, a proper cutoff for abnormal increment is highly relevant for improved recognition of this rare disease. METHODS: We determined the sensitivity and specificity of 60% and 100% cutoff values in all consecutive patients who underwent increment testing in our hospital from 1999 to 2016. RESULTS: We included 156 patients, 63 with LEMS and 93 without LEMS. Sensitivity of a 60% cutoff for increment testing was 77.8% (95% confidence interval 65.5%–87.3%) and 58.7% (45.6%–71.0%) for 100%. Specificity was 98.9% (94.2%–100%) and 100% (96.1%–100%) using a threshold of 60% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Lowering the cutoff value for abnormal increment to 60% greatly increases sensitivity to diagnose LEMS without an overt loss in specificity.