Cargando…

Lowering the cutoff value for increment increases the sensitivity for the diagnosis of Lambert‐Eaton myasthenic syndrome

BACKGROUND: Increment of compound muscle action potential amplitude is a diagnostic hallmark of Lambert‐Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS). Making a diagnosis can be challenging, therefore, a proper cutoff for abnormal increment is highly relevant for improved recognition of this rare disease. METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lipka, Alexander F., Titulaer, Maarten J., Tannemaat, Martijn R., Verschuuren, Jan J.G.M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32291768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mus.26885
_version_ 1783550809954320384
author Lipka, Alexander F.
Titulaer, Maarten J.
Tannemaat, Martijn R.
Verschuuren, Jan J.G.M.
author_facet Lipka, Alexander F.
Titulaer, Maarten J.
Tannemaat, Martijn R.
Verschuuren, Jan J.G.M.
author_sort Lipka, Alexander F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Increment of compound muscle action potential amplitude is a diagnostic hallmark of Lambert‐Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS). Making a diagnosis can be challenging, therefore, a proper cutoff for abnormal increment is highly relevant for improved recognition of this rare disease. METHODS: We determined the sensitivity and specificity of 60% and 100% cutoff values in all consecutive patients who underwent increment testing in our hospital from 1999 to 2016. RESULTS: We included 156 patients, 63 with LEMS and 93 without LEMS. Sensitivity of a 60% cutoff for increment testing was 77.8% (95% confidence interval 65.5%–87.3%) and 58.7% (45.6%–71.0%) for 100%. Specificity was 98.9% (94.2%–100%) and 100% (96.1%–100%) using a threshold of 60% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Lowering the cutoff value for abnormal increment to 60% greatly increases sensitivity to diagnose LEMS without an overt loss in specificity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7318278
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73182782020-06-29 Lowering the cutoff value for increment increases the sensitivity for the diagnosis of Lambert‐Eaton myasthenic syndrome Lipka, Alexander F. Titulaer, Maarten J. Tannemaat, Martijn R. Verschuuren, Jan J.G.M. Muscle Nerve Clinical Research Short Reports BACKGROUND: Increment of compound muscle action potential amplitude is a diagnostic hallmark of Lambert‐Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS). Making a diagnosis can be challenging, therefore, a proper cutoff for abnormal increment is highly relevant for improved recognition of this rare disease. METHODS: We determined the sensitivity and specificity of 60% and 100% cutoff values in all consecutive patients who underwent increment testing in our hospital from 1999 to 2016. RESULTS: We included 156 patients, 63 with LEMS and 93 without LEMS. Sensitivity of a 60% cutoff for increment testing was 77.8% (95% confidence interval 65.5%–87.3%) and 58.7% (45.6%–71.0%) for 100%. Specificity was 98.9% (94.2%–100%) and 100% (96.1%–100%) using a threshold of 60% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Lowering the cutoff value for abnormal increment to 60% greatly increases sensitivity to diagnose LEMS without an overt loss in specificity. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-04-22 2020-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7318278/ /pubmed/32291768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mus.26885 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Muscle & Nerve published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Clinical Research Short Reports
Lipka, Alexander F.
Titulaer, Maarten J.
Tannemaat, Martijn R.
Verschuuren, Jan J.G.M.
Lowering the cutoff value for increment increases the sensitivity for the diagnosis of Lambert‐Eaton myasthenic syndrome
title Lowering the cutoff value for increment increases the sensitivity for the diagnosis of Lambert‐Eaton myasthenic syndrome
title_full Lowering the cutoff value for increment increases the sensitivity for the diagnosis of Lambert‐Eaton myasthenic syndrome
title_fullStr Lowering the cutoff value for increment increases the sensitivity for the diagnosis of Lambert‐Eaton myasthenic syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Lowering the cutoff value for increment increases the sensitivity for the diagnosis of Lambert‐Eaton myasthenic syndrome
title_short Lowering the cutoff value for increment increases the sensitivity for the diagnosis of Lambert‐Eaton myasthenic syndrome
title_sort lowering the cutoff value for increment increases the sensitivity for the diagnosis of lambert‐eaton myasthenic syndrome
topic Clinical Research Short Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32291768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mus.26885
work_keys_str_mv AT lipkaalexanderf loweringthecutoffvalueforincrementincreasesthesensitivityforthediagnosisoflamberteatonmyasthenicsyndrome
AT titulaermaartenj loweringthecutoffvalueforincrementincreasesthesensitivityforthediagnosisoflamberteatonmyasthenicsyndrome
AT tannemaatmartijnr loweringthecutoffvalueforincrementincreasesthesensitivityforthediagnosisoflamberteatonmyasthenicsyndrome
AT verschuurenjanjgm loweringthecutoffvalueforincrementincreasesthesensitivityforthediagnosisoflamberteatonmyasthenicsyndrome