Cargando…

A quantitative cross‐sectional analysis of the melanin index in the skin of preterm newborns and its association with gestational age at birth

BACKGROUND: Estimation of gestational age (GA) is important to make timely decisions and provide appropriate neonatal care. Clinical maturity scales to estimate GA have used skin texture and color to assess maturity at birth facing situations of the uncertainty of pregnancy dating. The size and dark...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Silva, Paola Conceição, Guimarães, Rodney Nascimento, Souza, Rayner Guilherme, Reis, Zilma Silveira Nogueira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31763716
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.12810
_version_ 1783550819047571456
author Silva, Paola Conceição
Guimarães, Rodney Nascimento
Souza, Rayner Guilherme
Reis, Zilma Silveira Nogueira
author_facet Silva, Paola Conceição
Guimarães, Rodney Nascimento
Souza, Rayner Guilherme
Reis, Zilma Silveira Nogueira
author_sort Silva, Paola Conceição
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Estimation of gestational age (GA) is important to make timely decisions and provide appropriate neonatal care. Clinical maturity scales to estimate GA have used skin texture and color to assess maturity at birth facing situations of the uncertainty of pregnancy dating. The size and darkness of the areola around the nipple to grade skin characteristics are based on visual appearance. The melanin index (M‐Index) is an optical skin parameter related to the melanin content in the tissue. This study is aimed to associate the M‐Index of the skin with the GA. METHODS: A cross‐sectional study evaluated 80 newborns at birth. A photometer device quantified the skin pigmentation on the areolae, forearms, and soles. Paired average differences of M‐Index were compared among the three body sites. The skin M‐Indexes were compared between subgroups of newborns until 34 weeks or with 34 and more. RESULTS: The skin over the areola had the highest values of M‐Index compared with the forearm or sole areas (P < .001 for both). Infants with a GA between 34 and <37 weeks had higher M‐Index values over the areola than the group with a GA with 24 to <34 weeks: 41.7 (8.9) and 38.3 (10.5) median (IQR), P = .005. CONCLUSIONS: The measurable M‐Index values have the potential to improve physical evaluation in assessing GA at birth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7318316
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73183162020-06-29 A quantitative cross‐sectional analysis of the melanin index in the skin of preterm newborns and its association with gestational age at birth Silva, Paola Conceição Guimarães, Rodney Nascimento Souza, Rayner Guilherme Reis, Zilma Silveira Nogueira Skin Res Technol Original Articles BACKGROUND: Estimation of gestational age (GA) is important to make timely decisions and provide appropriate neonatal care. Clinical maturity scales to estimate GA have used skin texture and color to assess maturity at birth facing situations of the uncertainty of pregnancy dating. The size and darkness of the areola around the nipple to grade skin characteristics are based on visual appearance. The melanin index (M‐Index) is an optical skin parameter related to the melanin content in the tissue. This study is aimed to associate the M‐Index of the skin with the GA. METHODS: A cross‐sectional study evaluated 80 newborns at birth. A photometer device quantified the skin pigmentation on the areolae, forearms, and soles. Paired average differences of M‐Index were compared among the three body sites. The skin M‐Indexes were compared between subgroups of newborns until 34 weeks or with 34 and more. RESULTS: The skin over the areola had the highest values of M‐Index compared with the forearm or sole areas (P < .001 for both). Infants with a GA between 34 and <37 weeks had higher M‐Index values over the areola than the group with a GA with 24 to <34 weeks: 41.7 (8.9) and 38.3 (10.5) median (IQR), P = .005. CONCLUSIONS: The measurable M‐Index values have the potential to improve physical evaluation in assessing GA at birth. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-11-25 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7318316/ /pubmed/31763716 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.12810 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Skin Research and Technology. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Silva, Paola Conceição
Guimarães, Rodney Nascimento
Souza, Rayner Guilherme
Reis, Zilma Silveira Nogueira
A quantitative cross‐sectional analysis of the melanin index in the skin of preterm newborns and its association with gestational age at birth
title A quantitative cross‐sectional analysis of the melanin index in the skin of preterm newborns and its association with gestational age at birth
title_full A quantitative cross‐sectional analysis of the melanin index in the skin of preterm newborns and its association with gestational age at birth
title_fullStr A quantitative cross‐sectional analysis of the melanin index in the skin of preterm newborns and its association with gestational age at birth
title_full_unstemmed A quantitative cross‐sectional analysis of the melanin index in the skin of preterm newborns and its association with gestational age at birth
title_short A quantitative cross‐sectional analysis of the melanin index in the skin of preterm newborns and its association with gestational age at birth
title_sort quantitative cross‐sectional analysis of the melanin index in the skin of preterm newborns and its association with gestational age at birth
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31763716
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.12810
work_keys_str_mv AT silvapaolaconceicao aquantitativecrosssectionalanalysisofthemelaninindexintheskinofpretermnewbornsanditsassociationwithgestationalageatbirth
AT guimaraesrodneynascimento aquantitativecrosssectionalanalysisofthemelaninindexintheskinofpretermnewbornsanditsassociationwithgestationalageatbirth
AT souzaraynerguilherme aquantitativecrosssectionalanalysisofthemelaninindexintheskinofpretermnewbornsanditsassociationwithgestationalageatbirth
AT reiszilmasilveiranogueira aquantitativecrosssectionalanalysisofthemelaninindexintheskinofpretermnewbornsanditsassociationwithgestationalageatbirth
AT silvapaolaconceicao quantitativecrosssectionalanalysisofthemelaninindexintheskinofpretermnewbornsanditsassociationwithgestationalageatbirth
AT guimaraesrodneynascimento quantitativecrosssectionalanalysisofthemelaninindexintheskinofpretermnewbornsanditsassociationwithgestationalageatbirth
AT souzaraynerguilherme quantitativecrosssectionalanalysisofthemelaninindexintheskinofpretermnewbornsanditsassociationwithgestationalageatbirth
AT reiszilmasilveiranogueira quantitativecrosssectionalanalysisofthemelaninindexintheskinofpretermnewbornsanditsassociationwithgestationalageatbirth