Cargando…
A comparative analysis of tioguanine versus low‐dose thiopurines combined with allopurinol in inflammatory bowel disease patients
BACKGROUND: Both tioguanine and low‐dose thiopurines combined with allopurinol (LDTA) can be considered for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) when conventional thiopurines fail due to adverse events. AIM: To compare the safety of tioguanine and LDTA in IBD patients. METHODS: Inflamma...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32339331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.15730 |
_version_ | 1783550821648039936 |
---|---|
author | Biemans, Vince B. C. Savelkoul, Edo Gabriëls, Ruben Y. Simsek, Melek Dijkstra, Gerard Pierik, Marieke J. West, Rachel L. de Boer, Nanne K.H. Hoentjen, Frank |
author_facet | Biemans, Vince B. C. Savelkoul, Edo Gabriëls, Ruben Y. Simsek, Melek Dijkstra, Gerard Pierik, Marieke J. West, Rachel L. de Boer, Nanne K.H. Hoentjen, Frank |
author_sort | Biemans, Vince B. C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Both tioguanine and low‐dose thiopurines combined with allopurinol (LDTA) can be considered for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) when conventional thiopurines fail due to adverse events. AIM: To compare the safety of tioguanine and LDTA in IBD patients. METHODS: Inflammatory bowel disease patients who failed conventional thiopurines due to adverse events and initiated LDTA in standard care were identified in the prospective ICC Registry. IBD patients who failed conventional thiopurines due to adverse events and initiated tioguanine were enrolled in three university hospitals. Patients on concomitant biologicals were excluded. The primary outcome was discontinuation of therapy due to adverse events. Secondary outcomes included: safety outcomes and surgery‐, biological‐ and corticosteroid‐free clinical remission (physician global assessment = 0) after 104 weeks. Both multiple logistic regression and propensity score matching were used to correct for confounders. RESULTS: In total, 182 IBD patients treated with tioguanine (n = 94) or LDTA (n = 88) were included with a median follow‐up of 104 weeks (IQR 91‐104). Of these, 19% (tioguanine: 20%, LDTA: 18%) of patients discontinued therapy due to adverse events. After adjusting for confounders, there were no differences in terms of discontinuation rate due to adverse events (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.15‐1.68, P = 0.26), adverse events (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.44‐1.81, P = 0.75), infections (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.40‐2.73, P = 0.93), hospitalisations (OR 2.00, 95% CI 0.64‐6.23, P = 0.23) or clinical remission (OR 0.74, 95%CI 0.33‐1.68, P = 0.48). All results are comparable with the propensity score matched cohort. CONCLUSION: Nineteen percent of IBD patients with prior failure to conventional thiopurines due to adverse events discontinued therapy with tioguanine or LDTA due to adverse events. Either therapy may be considered before escalating to biological therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7318327 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73183272020-06-29 A comparative analysis of tioguanine versus low‐dose thiopurines combined with allopurinol in inflammatory bowel disease patients Biemans, Vince B. C. Savelkoul, Edo Gabriëls, Ruben Y. Simsek, Melek Dijkstra, Gerard Pierik, Marieke J. West, Rachel L. de Boer, Nanne K.H. Hoentjen, Frank Aliment Pharmacol Ther Article BACKGROUND: Both tioguanine and low‐dose thiopurines combined with allopurinol (LDTA) can be considered for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) when conventional thiopurines fail due to adverse events. AIM: To compare the safety of tioguanine and LDTA in IBD patients. METHODS: Inflammatory bowel disease patients who failed conventional thiopurines due to adverse events and initiated LDTA in standard care were identified in the prospective ICC Registry. IBD patients who failed conventional thiopurines due to adverse events and initiated tioguanine were enrolled in three university hospitals. Patients on concomitant biologicals were excluded. The primary outcome was discontinuation of therapy due to adverse events. Secondary outcomes included: safety outcomes and surgery‐, biological‐ and corticosteroid‐free clinical remission (physician global assessment = 0) after 104 weeks. Both multiple logistic regression and propensity score matching were used to correct for confounders. RESULTS: In total, 182 IBD patients treated with tioguanine (n = 94) or LDTA (n = 88) were included with a median follow‐up of 104 weeks (IQR 91‐104). Of these, 19% (tioguanine: 20%, LDTA: 18%) of patients discontinued therapy due to adverse events. After adjusting for confounders, there were no differences in terms of discontinuation rate due to adverse events (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.15‐1.68, P = 0.26), adverse events (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.44‐1.81, P = 0.75), infections (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.40‐2.73, P = 0.93), hospitalisations (OR 2.00, 95% CI 0.64‐6.23, P = 0.23) or clinical remission (OR 0.74, 95%CI 0.33‐1.68, P = 0.48). All results are comparable with the propensity score matched cohort. CONCLUSION: Nineteen percent of IBD patients with prior failure to conventional thiopurines due to adverse events discontinued therapy with tioguanine or LDTA due to adverse events. Either therapy may be considered before escalating to biological therapy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-04-27 2020-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7318327/ /pubmed/32339331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.15730 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Article Biemans, Vince B. C. Savelkoul, Edo Gabriëls, Ruben Y. Simsek, Melek Dijkstra, Gerard Pierik, Marieke J. West, Rachel L. de Boer, Nanne K.H. Hoentjen, Frank A comparative analysis of tioguanine versus low‐dose thiopurines combined with allopurinol in inflammatory bowel disease patients |
title | A comparative analysis of tioguanine versus low‐dose thiopurines combined with allopurinol in inflammatory bowel disease patients |
title_full | A comparative analysis of tioguanine versus low‐dose thiopurines combined with allopurinol in inflammatory bowel disease patients |
title_fullStr | A comparative analysis of tioguanine versus low‐dose thiopurines combined with allopurinol in inflammatory bowel disease patients |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative analysis of tioguanine versus low‐dose thiopurines combined with allopurinol in inflammatory bowel disease patients |
title_short | A comparative analysis of tioguanine versus low‐dose thiopurines combined with allopurinol in inflammatory bowel disease patients |
title_sort | comparative analysis of tioguanine versus low‐dose thiopurines combined with allopurinol in inflammatory bowel disease patients |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32339331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.15730 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT biemansvincebc acomparativeanalysisoftioguanineversuslowdosethiopurinescombinedwithallopurinolininflammatoryboweldiseasepatients AT savelkouledo acomparativeanalysisoftioguanineversuslowdosethiopurinescombinedwithallopurinolininflammatoryboweldiseasepatients AT gabrielsrubeny acomparativeanalysisoftioguanineversuslowdosethiopurinescombinedwithallopurinolininflammatoryboweldiseasepatients AT simsekmelek acomparativeanalysisoftioguanineversuslowdosethiopurinescombinedwithallopurinolininflammatoryboweldiseasepatients AT dijkstragerard acomparativeanalysisoftioguanineversuslowdosethiopurinescombinedwithallopurinolininflammatoryboweldiseasepatients AT pierikmariekej acomparativeanalysisoftioguanineversuslowdosethiopurinescombinedwithallopurinolininflammatoryboweldiseasepatients AT westrachell acomparativeanalysisoftioguanineversuslowdosethiopurinescombinedwithallopurinolininflammatoryboweldiseasepatients AT deboernannekh acomparativeanalysisoftioguanineversuslowdosethiopurinescombinedwithallopurinolininflammatoryboweldiseasepatients AT hoentjenfrank acomparativeanalysisoftioguanineversuslowdosethiopurinescombinedwithallopurinolininflammatoryboweldiseasepatients AT biemansvincebc comparativeanalysisoftioguanineversuslowdosethiopurinescombinedwithallopurinolininflammatoryboweldiseasepatients AT savelkouledo comparativeanalysisoftioguanineversuslowdosethiopurinescombinedwithallopurinolininflammatoryboweldiseasepatients AT gabrielsrubeny comparativeanalysisoftioguanineversuslowdosethiopurinescombinedwithallopurinolininflammatoryboweldiseasepatients AT simsekmelek comparativeanalysisoftioguanineversuslowdosethiopurinescombinedwithallopurinolininflammatoryboweldiseasepatients AT dijkstragerard comparativeanalysisoftioguanineversuslowdosethiopurinescombinedwithallopurinolininflammatoryboweldiseasepatients AT pierikmariekej comparativeanalysisoftioguanineversuslowdosethiopurinescombinedwithallopurinolininflammatoryboweldiseasepatients AT westrachell comparativeanalysisoftioguanineversuslowdosethiopurinescombinedwithallopurinolininflammatoryboweldiseasepatients AT deboernannekh comparativeanalysisoftioguanineversuslowdosethiopurinescombinedwithallopurinolininflammatoryboweldiseasepatients AT hoentjenfrank comparativeanalysisoftioguanineversuslowdosethiopurinescombinedwithallopurinolininflammatoryboweldiseasepatients |