Cargando…

A comparative analysis of tioguanine versus low‐dose thiopurines combined with allopurinol in inflammatory bowel disease patients

BACKGROUND: Both tioguanine and low‐dose thiopurines combined with allopurinol (LDTA) can be considered for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) when conventional thiopurines fail due to adverse events. AIM: To compare the safety of tioguanine and LDTA in IBD patients. METHODS: Inflamma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Biemans, Vince B. C., Savelkoul, Edo, Gabriëls, Ruben Y., Simsek, Melek, Dijkstra, Gerard, Pierik, Marieke J., West, Rachel L., de Boer, Nanne K.H., Hoentjen, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32339331
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.15730
_version_ 1783550821648039936
author Biemans, Vince B. C.
Savelkoul, Edo
Gabriëls, Ruben Y.
Simsek, Melek
Dijkstra, Gerard
Pierik, Marieke J.
West, Rachel L.
de Boer, Nanne K.H.
Hoentjen, Frank
author_facet Biemans, Vince B. C.
Savelkoul, Edo
Gabriëls, Ruben Y.
Simsek, Melek
Dijkstra, Gerard
Pierik, Marieke J.
West, Rachel L.
de Boer, Nanne K.H.
Hoentjen, Frank
author_sort Biemans, Vince B. C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Both tioguanine and low‐dose thiopurines combined with allopurinol (LDTA) can be considered for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) when conventional thiopurines fail due to adverse events. AIM: To compare the safety of tioguanine and LDTA in IBD patients. METHODS: Inflammatory bowel disease patients who failed conventional thiopurines due to adverse events and initiated LDTA in standard care were identified in the prospective ICC Registry. IBD patients who failed conventional thiopurines due to adverse events and initiated tioguanine were enrolled in three university hospitals. Patients on concomitant biologicals were excluded. The primary outcome was discontinuation of therapy due to adverse events. Secondary outcomes included: safety outcomes and surgery‐, biological‐ and corticosteroid‐free clinical remission (physician global assessment = 0) after 104 weeks. Both multiple logistic regression and propensity score matching were used to correct for confounders. RESULTS: In total, 182 IBD patients treated with tioguanine (n = 94) or LDTA (n = 88) were included with a median follow‐up of 104 weeks (IQR 91‐104). Of these, 19% (tioguanine: 20%, LDTA: 18%) of patients discontinued therapy due to adverse events. After adjusting for confounders, there were no differences in terms of discontinuation rate due to adverse events (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.15‐1.68, P = 0.26), adverse events (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.44‐1.81, P = 0.75), infections (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.40‐2.73, P = 0.93), hospitalisations (OR 2.00, 95% CI 0.64‐6.23, P = 0.23) or clinical remission (OR 0.74, 95%CI 0.33‐1.68, P = 0.48). All results are comparable with the propensity score matched cohort. CONCLUSION: Nineteen percent of IBD patients with prior failure to conventional thiopurines due to adverse events discontinued therapy with tioguanine or LDTA due to adverse events. Either therapy may be considered before escalating to biological therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7318327
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73183272020-06-29 A comparative analysis of tioguanine versus low‐dose thiopurines combined with allopurinol in inflammatory bowel disease patients Biemans, Vince B. C. Savelkoul, Edo Gabriëls, Ruben Y. Simsek, Melek Dijkstra, Gerard Pierik, Marieke J. West, Rachel L. de Boer, Nanne K.H. Hoentjen, Frank Aliment Pharmacol Ther Article BACKGROUND: Both tioguanine and low‐dose thiopurines combined with allopurinol (LDTA) can be considered for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) when conventional thiopurines fail due to adverse events. AIM: To compare the safety of tioguanine and LDTA in IBD patients. METHODS: Inflammatory bowel disease patients who failed conventional thiopurines due to adverse events and initiated LDTA in standard care were identified in the prospective ICC Registry. IBD patients who failed conventional thiopurines due to adverse events and initiated tioguanine were enrolled in three university hospitals. Patients on concomitant biologicals were excluded. The primary outcome was discontinuation of therapy due to adverse events. Secondary outcomes included: safety outcomes and surgery‐, biological‐ and corticosteroid‐free clinical remission (physician global assessment = 0) after 104 weeks. Both multiple logistic regression and propensity score matching were used to correct for confounders. RESULTS: In total, 182 IBD patients treated with tioguanine (n = 94) or LDTA (n = 88) were included with a median follow‐up of 104 weeks (IQR 91‐104). Of these, 19% (tioguanine: 20%, LDTA: 18%) of patients discontinued therapy due to adverse events. After adjusting for confounders, there were no differences in terms of discontinuation rate due to adverse events (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.15‐1.68, P = 0.26), adverse events (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.44‐1.81, P = 0.75), infections (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.40‐2.73, P = 0.93), hospitalisations (OR 2.00, 95% CI 0.64‐6.23, P = 0.23) or clinical remission (OR 0.74, 95%CI 0.33‐1.68, P = 0.48). All results are comparable with the propensity score matched cohort. CONCLUSION: Nineteen percent of IBD patients with prior failure to conventional thiopurines due to adverse events discontinued therapy with tioguanine or LDTA due to adverse events. Either therapy may be considered before escalating to biological therapy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-04-27 2020-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7318327/ /pubmed/32339331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.15730 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Article
Biemans, Vince B. C.
Savelkoul, Edo
Gabriëls, Ruben Y.
Simsek, Melek
Dijkstra, Gerard
Pierik, Marieke J.
West, Rachel L.
de Boer, Nanne K.H.
Hoentjen, Frank
A comparative analysis of tioguanine versus low‐dose thiopurines combined with allopurinol in inflammatory bowel disease patients
title A comparative analysis of tioguanine versus low‐dose thiopurines combined with allopurinol in inflammatory bowel disease patients
title_full A comparative analysis of tioguanine versus low‐dose thiopurines combined with allopurinol in inflammatory bowel disease patients
title_fullStr A comparative analysis of tioguanine versus low‐dose thiopurines combined with allopurinol in inflammatory bowel disease patients
title_full_unstemmed A comparative analysis of tioguanine versus low‐dose thiopurines combined with allopurinol in inflammatory bowel disease patients
title_short A comparative analysis of tioguanine versus low‐dose thiopurines combined with allopurinol in inflammatory bowel disease patients
title_sort comparative analysis of tioguanine versus low‐dose thiopurines combined with allopurinol in inflammatory bowel disease patients
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32339331
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.15730
work_keys_str_mv AT biemansvincebc acomparativeanalysisoftioguanineversuslowdosethiopurinescombinedwithallopurinolininflammatoryboweldiseasepatients
AT savelkouledo acomparativeanalysisoftioguanineversuslowdosethiopurinescombinedwithallopurinolininflammatoryboweldiseasepatients
AT gabrielsrubeny acomparativeanalysisoftioguanineversuslowdosethiopurinescombinedwithallopurinolininflammatoryboweldiseasepatients
AT simsekmelek acomparativeanalysisoftioguanineversuslowdosethiopurinescombinedwithallopurinolininflammatoryboweldiseasepatients
AT dijkstragerard acomparativeanalysisoftioguanineversuslowdosethiopurinescombinedwithallopurinolininflammatoryboweldiseasepatients
AT pierikmariekej acomparativeanalysisoftioguanineversuslowdosethiopurinescombinedwithallopurinolininflammatoryboweldiseasepatients
AT westrachell acomparativeanalysisoftioguanineversuslowdosethiopurinescombinedwithallopurinolininflammatoryboweldiseasepatients
AT deboernannekh acomparativeanalysisoftioguanineversuslowdosethiopurinescombinedwithallopurinolininflammatoryboweldiseasepatients
AT hoentjenfrank acomparativeanalysisoftioguanineversuslowdosethiopurinescombinedwithallopurinolininflammatoryboweldiseasepatients
AT biemansvincebc comparativeanalysisoftioguanineversuslowdosethiopurinescombinedwithallopurinolininflammatoryboweldiseasepatients
AT savelkouledo comparativeanalysisoftioguanineversuslowdosethiopurinescombinedwithallopurinolininflammatoryboweldiseasepatients
AT gabrielsrubeny comparativeanalysisoftioguanineversuslowdosethiopurinescombinedwithallopurinolininflammatoryboweldiseasepatients
AT simsekmelek comparativeanalysisoftioguanineversuslowdosethiopurinescombinedwithallopurinolininflammatoryboweldiseasepatients
AT dijkstragerard comparativeanalysisoftioguanineversuslowdosethiopurinescombinedwithallopurinolininflammatoryboweldiseasepatients
AT pierikmariekej comparativeanalysisoftioguanineversuslowdosethiopurinescombinedwithallopurinolininflammatoryboweldiseasepatients
AT westrachell comparativeanalysisoftioguanineversuslowdosethiopurinescombinedwithallopurinolininflammatoryboweldiseasepatients
AT deboernannekh comparativeanalysisoftioguanineversuslowdosethiopurinescombinedwithallopurinolininflammatoryboweldiseasepatients
AT hoentjenfrank comparativeanalysisoftioguanineversuslowdosethiopurinescombinedwithallopurinolininflammatoryboweldiseasepatients