Cargando…
Spatial conservation prioritisation in data-poor countries: a quantitative sensitivity analysis using multiple taxa
BACKGROUND: Spatial conservation prioritisation (SCP) is a set of computational tools designed to support the efficient spatial allocation of priority areas for conservation actions, but it is subject to many sources of uncertainty which should be accounted for during the prioritisation process. We...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32590973 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12898-020-00305-7 |
_version_ | 1783550857230417920 |
---|---|
author | El-Gabbas, Ahmed Gilbert, Francis Dormann, Carsten F. |
author_facet | El-Gabbas, Ahmed Gilbert, Francis Dormann, Carsten F. |
author_sort | El-Gabbas, Ahmed |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Spatial conservation prioritisation (SCP) is a set of computational tools designed to support the efficient spatial allocation of priority areas for conservation actions, but it is subject to many sources of uncertainty which should be accounted for during the prioritisation process. We quantified the sensitivity of an SCP application (using software Zonation) to possible sources of uncertainty in data-poor situations, including the use of different surrogate options; correction for sampling bias; how to integrate connectivity; the choice of species distribution modelling (SDM) algorithm; how cells are removed from the landscape; and two methods of assigning weights to species (red-list status or prediction uncertainty). Further, we evaluated the effectiveness of the Egyptian protected areas for conservation, and spatially allocated the top priority sites for further on-the-ground evaluation as potential areas for protected areas expansion. RESULTS: Focal taxon (butterflies, reptiles, and mammals), sampling bias, connectivity and the choice of SDM algorithm were the most sensitive parameters; collectively these reflect data quality issues. In contrast, cell removal rule and species weights contributed much less to overall variability. Using currently available species data, we found the current effectiveness of Egypt’s protected areas for conserving fauna was low. CONCLUSIONS: For SCP to be useful, there is a lower limit on data quality, requiring data-poor countries to improve sampling strategies and data quality to obtain unbiased data for as many taxa as possible. Since our sensitivity analysis may not generalise, conservation planners should use sensitivity analyses more routinely, particularly relying on more than one combination of SDM algorithm and surrogate group, consider correction for sampling bias, and compare the spatial patterns of predicted priority sites using a variety of settings. The sensitivity of SCP to connectivity parameters means that the responses of each species to habitat loss are important knowledge gaps. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7318458 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73184582020-06-29 Spatial conservation prioritisation in data-poor countries: a quantitative sensitivity analysis using multiple taxa El-Gabbas, Ahmed Gilbert, Francis Dormann, Carsten F. BMC Ecol Research Article BACKGROUND: Spatial conservation prioritisation (SCP) is a set of computational tools designed to support the efficient spatial allocation of priority areas for conservation actions, but it is subject to many sources of uncertainty which should be accounted for during the prioritisation process. We quantified the sensitivity of an SCP application (using software Zonation) to possible sources of uncertainty in data-poor situations, including the use of different surrogate options; correction for sampling bias; how to integrate connectivity; the choice of species distribution modelling (SDM) algorithm; how cells are removed from the landscape; and two methods of assigning weights to species (red-list status or prediction uncertainty). Further, we evaluated the effectiveness of the Egyptian protected areas for conservation, and spatially allocated the top priority sites for further on-the-ground evaluation as potential areas for protected areas expansion. RESULTS: Focal taxon (butterflies, reptiles, and mammals), sampling bias, connectivity and the choice of SDM algorithm were the most sensitive parameters; collectively these reflect data quality issues. In contrast, cell removal rule and species weights contributed much less to overall variability. Using currently available species data, we found the current effectiveness of Egypt’s protected areas for conserving fauna was low. CONCLUSIONS: For SCP to be useful, there is a lower limit on data quality, requiring data-poor countries to improve sampling strategies and data quality to obtain unbiased data for as many taxa as possible. Since our sensitivity analysis may not generalise, conservation planners should use sensitivity analyses more routinely, particularly relying on more than one combination of SDM algorithm and surrogate group, consider correction for sampling bias, and compare the spatial patterns of predicted priority sites using a variety of settings. The sensitivity of SCP to connectivity parameters means that the responses of each species to habitat loss are important knowledge gaps. BioMed Central 2020-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7318458/ /pubmed/32590973 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12898-020-00305-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article El-Gabbas, Ahmed Gilbert, Francis Dormann, Carsten F. Spatial conservation prioritisation in data-poor countries: a quantitative sensitivity analysis using multiple taxa |
title | Spatial conservation prioritisation in data-poor countries: a quantitative sensitivity analysis using multiple taxa |
title_full | Spatial conservation prioritisation in data-poor countries: a quantitative sensitivity analysis using multiple taxa |
title_fullStr | Spatial conservation prioritisation in data-poor countries: a quantitative sensitivity analysis using multiple taxa |
title_full_unstemmed | Spatial conservation prioritisation in data-poor countries: a quantitative sensitivity analysis using multiple taxa |
title_short | Spatial conservation prioritisation in data-poor countries: a quantitative sensitivity analysis using multiple taxa |
title_sort | spatial conservation prioritisation in data-poor countries: a quantitative sensitivity analysis using multiple taxa |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32590973 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12898-020-00305-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elgabbasahmed spatialconservationprioritisationindatapoorcountriesaquantitativesensitivityanalysisusingmultipletaxa AT gilbertfrancis spatialconservationprioritisationindatapoorcountriesaquantitativesensitivityanalysisusingmultipletaxa AT dormanncarstenf spatialconservationprioritisationindatapoorcountriesaquantitativesensitivityanalysisusingmultipletaxa |