Cargando…

Resident attitudes and benefits of mock oral board examinations in radiation oncology

BACKGROUND: Presently, educational programming is not standardized across radiation oncology (RO) training programs. Specifically, there are limited materials through national organizations or structured practice exams for residents preparing for the American Board of Radiology (ABR) oral board exam...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peters, Gabrielle W., Decker, Roy H., Park, Henry S., Yu, James B., Evans, Suzanne B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32586357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02106-4
_version_ 1783550870444572672
author Peters, Gabrielle W.
Decker, Roy H.
Park, Henry S.
Yu, James B.
Evans, Suzanne B.
author_facet Peters, Gabrielle W.
Decker, Roy H.
Park, Henry S.
Yu, James B.
Evans, Suzanne B.
author_sort Peters, Gabrielle W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Presently, educational programming is not standardized across radiation oncology (RO) training programs. Specifically, there are limited materials through national organizations or structured practice exams for residents preparing for the American Board of Radiology (ABR) oral board examination. We present our 2019 experience implementing a formalized program of early mock oral board examinations (MOBE) for residents in post-graduate years (PGY) 3–5. METHODS: A mixed-methods survey regarding MOBE perception and self-reported comfort across five clinical domains were administered to PGY2–5 residents. MOBEs and a post-intervention survey were implemented for the PGY3–5. The pre and post-intervention score across clinical domains were compared using t-tests. Faculty and residents were asked for post-intervention comments. RESULTS: A total of 14 PGY2–5 residents completed the pre-intervention survey; 9 residents participated in the MOBE (5/14 residents were PGY2s) and post-intervention survey. This was the first mock oral radiation oncology examination experience for 65% of residents. 100% of residents felt the MOBE increased their clinical knowledge and comfort with clinical reasoning. Overall, there was a trend towards improved resident confidence giving planning dose parameters and (p = 0.08). There was also unanimous request for more MOBE experiences from residents and faculty, but time was identified as a significant barrier. CONCLUSIONS: Future directions for this MOBE program are inclusion of more disease sites, better emulation of the exam, the creation of a more rigorous consolidated format testing all sites at once, and consideration for grading of these sessions for future correlation with certifying oral board examination (OBE) performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7318518
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73185182020-06-29 Resident attitudes and benefits of mock oral board examinations in radiation oncology Peters, Gabrielle W. Decker, Roy H. Park, Henry S. Yu, James B. Evans, Suzanne B. BMC Med Educ Correspondence BACKGROUND: Presently, educational programming is not standardized across radiation oncology (RO) training programs. Specifically, there are limited materials through national organizations or structured practice exams for residents preparing for the American Board of Radiology (ABR) oral board examination. We present our 2019 experience implementing a formalized program of early mock oral board examinations (MOBE) for residents in post-graduate years (PGY) 3–5. METHODS: A mixed-methods survey regarding MOBE perception and self-reported comfort across five clinical domains were administered to PGY2–5 residents. MOBEs and a post-intervention survey were implemented for the PGY3–5. The pre and post-intervention score across clinical domains were compared using t-tests. Faculty and residents were asked for post-intervention comments. RESULTS: A total of 14 PGY2–5 residents completed the pre-intervention survey; 9 residents participated in the MOBE (5/14 residents were PGY2s) and post-intervention survey. This was the first mock oral radiation oncology examination experience for 65% of residents. 100% of residents felt the MOBE increased their clinical knowledge and comfort with clinical reasoning. Overall, there was a trend towards improved resident confidence giving planning dose parameters and (p = 0.08). There was also unanimous request for more MOBE experiences from residents and faculty, but time was identified as a significant barrier. CONCLUSIONS: Future directions for this MOBE program are inclusion of more disease sites, better emulation of the exam, the creation of a more rigorous consolidated format testing all sites at once, and consideration for grading of these sessions for future correlation with certifying oral board examination (OBE) performance. BioMed Central 2020-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7318518/ /pubmed/32586357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02106-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Correspondence
Peters, Gabrielle W.
Decker, Roy H.
Park, Henry S.
Yu, James B.
Evans, Suzanne B.
Resident attitudes and benefits of mock oral board examinations in radiation oncology
title Resident attitudes and benefits of mock oral board examinations in radiation oncology
title_full Resident attitudes and benefits of mock oral board examinations in radiation oncology
title_fullStr Resident attitudes and benefits of mock oral board examinations in radiation oncology
title_full_unstemmed Resident attitudes and benefits of mock oral board examinations in radiation oncology
title_short Resident attitudes and benefits of mock oral board examinations in radiation oncology
title_sort resident attitudes and benefits of mock oral board examinations in radiation oncology
topic Correspondence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32586357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02106-4
work_keys_str_mv AT petersgabriellew residentattitudesandbenefitsofmockoralboardexaminationsinradiationoncology
AT deckerroyh residentattitudesandbenefitsofmockoralboardexaminationsinradiationoncology
AT parkhenrys residentattitudesandbenefitsofmockoralboardexaminationsinradiationoncology
AT yujamesb residentattitudesandbenefitsofmockoralboardexaminationsinradiationoncology
AT evanssuzanneb residentattitudesandbenefitsofmockoralboardexaminationsinradiationoncology