Cargando…

Appropriate referral and selection of patients with chronic pain for spinal cord stimulation: European consensus recommendations and e‐health tool

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an established treatment for chronic neuropathic, neuropathic‐like and ischaemic pain. However, the heterogeneity of patients in daily clinical practice makes it often challenging to determine which patients are eligible for this treatment, resulting in u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thomson, Simon, Huygen, Frank, Prangnell, Simon, De Andrés, José, Baranidharan, Ganesan, Belaïd, Hayat, Berry, Neil, Billet, Bart, Cooil, Jan, De Carolis, Giuliano, Demartini, Laura, Eldabe, Sam, Gatzinsky, Kliment, Kallewaard, Jan W., Meier, Kaare, Paroli, Mery, Stark, Angela, Winkelmüller, Matthias, Stoevelaar, Herman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32187774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1562
_version_ 1783550911292899328
author Thomson, Simon
Huygen, Frank
Prangnell, Simon
De Andrés, José
Baranidharan, Ganesan
Belaïd, Hayat
Berry, Neil
Billet, Bart
Cooil, Jan
De Carolis, Giuliano
Demartini, Laura
Eldabe, Sam
Gatzinsky, Kliment
Kallewaard, Jan W.
Meier, Kaare
Paroli, Mery
Stark, Angela
Winkelmüller, Matthias
Stoevelaar, Herman
author_facet Thomson, Simon
Huygen, Frank
Prangnell, Simon
De Andrés, José
Baranidharan, Ganesan
Belaïd, Hayat
Berry, Neil
Billet, Bart
Cooil, Jan
De Carolis, Giuliano
Demartini, Laura
Eldabe, Sam
Gatzinsky, Kliment
Kallewaard, Jan W.
Meier, Kaare
Paroli, Mery
Stark, Angela
Winkelmüller, Matthias
Stoevelaar, Herman
author_sort Thomson, Simon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an established treatment for chronic neuropathic, neuropathic‐like and ischaemic pain. However, the heterogeneity of patients in daily clinical practice makes it often challenging to determine which patients are eligible for this treatment, resulting in undesirable practice variations. This study aimed to establish patient‐specific recommendations for referral and selection of SCS in chronic pain. METHODS: A multidisciplinary European panel used the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RUAM) to assess the appropriateness of (referral for) SCS for 386 clinical scenarios in four pain areas: chronic low back pain and/or leg pain, complex regional pain syndrome, neuropathic pain syndromes and ischaemic pain syndromes. In addition, the panel identified a set of psychosocial factors that are relevant to the decision for SCS treatment. RESULTS: Appropriateness of SCS was strongly determined by the neuropathic or neuropathic‐like pain component, location and spread of pain, anatomic abnormalities and previous response to therapies targeting pain processing (e.g. nerve block). Psychosocial factors considered relevant for SCS selection were as follows: lack of engagement, dysfunctional coping, unrealistic expectations, inadequate daily activity level, problematic social support, secondary gain, psychological distress and unwillingness to reduce high‐dose opioids. An educational e‐health tool was developed that combines clinical and psychosocial factors into an advice on referral/selection for SCS. CONCLUSIONS: The RUAM was useful to establish a consensus on patient‐specific criteria for referral/selection for SCS in chronic pain. The e‐health tool may help physicians learn to apply an integrated approach of clinical and psychosocial factors. SIGNIFICANCE: Determining the eligibility of SCS in patients with chronic pain requires careful consideration of a variety of clinical and psychosocial factors. Using a systematic approach to combine evidence from clinical studies and expert opinion, a multidisciplinary European expert panel developed detailed recommendations to support appropriate referral and selection for SCS in chronic pain. These recommendations are available as an educational e‐health tool (https://www.scstool.org/).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7318692
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73186922020-06-29 Appropriate referral and selection of patients with chronic pain for spinal cord stimulation: European consensus recommendations and e‐health tool Thomson, Simon Huygen, Frank Prangnell, Simon De Andrés, José Baranidharan, Ganesan Belaïd, Hayat Berry, Neil Billet, Bart Cooil, Jan De Carolis, Giuliano Demartini, Laura Eldabe, Sam Gatzinsky, Kliment Kallewaard, Jan W. Meier, Kaare Paroli, Mery Stark, Angela Winkelmüller, Matthias Stoevelaar, Herman Eur J Pain Original Articles BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an established treatment for chronic neuropathic, neuropathic‐like and ischaemic pain. However, the heterogeneity of patients in daily clinical practice makes it often challenging to determine which patients are eligible for this treatment, resulting in undesirable practice variations. This study aimed to establish patient‐specific recommendations for referral and selection of SCS in chronic pain. METHODS: A multidisciplinary European panel used the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RUAM) to assess the appropriateness of (referral for) SCS for 386 clinical scenarios in four pain areas: chronic low back pain and/or leg pain, complex regional pain syndrome, neuropathic pain syndromes and ischaemic pain syndromes. In addition, the panel identified a set of psychosocial factors that are relevant to the decision for SCS treatment. RESULTS: Appropriateness of SCS was strongly determined by the neuropathic or neuropathic‐like pain component, location and spread of pain, anatomic abnormalities and previous response to therapies targeting pain processing (e.g. nerve block). Psychosocial factors considered relevant for SCS selection were as follows: lack of engagement, dysfunctional coping, unrealistic expectations, inadequate daily activity level, problematic social support, secondary gain, psychological distress and unwillingness to reduce high‐dose opioids. An educational e‐health tool was developed that combines clinical and psychosocial factors into an advice on referral/selection for SCS. CONCLUSIONS: The RUAM was useful to establish a consensus on patient‐specific criteria for referral/selection for SCS in chronic pain. The e‐health tool may help physicians learn to apply an integrated approach of clinical and psychosocial factors. SIGNIFICANCE: Determining the eligibility of SCS in patients with chronic pain requires careful consideration of a variety of clinical and psychosocial factors. Using a systematic approach to combine evidence from clinical studies and expert opinion, a multidisciplinary European expert panel developed detailed recommendations to support appropriate referral and selection for SCS in chronic pain. These recommendations are available as an educational e‐health tool (https://www.scstool.org/). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-04-04 2020-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7318692/ /pubmed/32187774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1562 Text en © 2020 The Authors. European Journal of Pain published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Pain Federation ‐ EFIC® This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Thomson, Simon
Huygen, Frank
Prangnell, Simon
De Andrés, José
Baranidharan, Ganesan
Belaïd, Hayat
Berry, Neil
Billet, Bart
Cooil, Jan
De Carolis, Giuliano
Demartini, Laura
Eldabe, Sam
Gatzinsky, Kliment
Kallewaard, Jan W.
Meier, Kaare
Paroli, Mery
Stark, Angela
Winkelmüller, Matthias
Stoevelaar, Herman
Appropriate referral and selection of patients with chronic pain for spinal cord stimulation: European consensus recommendations and e‐health tool
title Appropriate referral and selection of patients with chronic pain for spinal cord stimulation: European consensus recommendations and e‐health tool
title_full Appropriate referral and selection of patients with chronic pain for spinal cord stimulation: European consensus recommendations and e‐health tool
title_fullStr Appropriate referral and selection of patients with chronic pain for spinal cord stimulation: European consensus recommendations and e‐health tool
title_full_unstemmed Appropriate referral and selection of patients with chronic pain for spinal cord stimulation: European consensus recommendations and e‐health tool
title_short Appropriate referral and selection of patients with chronic pain for spinal cord stimulation: European consensus recommendations and e‐health tool
title_sort appropriate referral and selection of patients with chronic pain for spinal cord stimulation: european consensus recommendations and e‐health tool
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32187774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1562
work_keys_str_mv AT thomsonsimon appropriatereferralandselectionofpatientswithchronicpainforspinalcordstimulationeuropeanconsensusrecommendationsandehealthtool
AT huygenfrank appropriatereferralandselectionofpatientswithchronicpainforspinalcordstimulationeuropeanconsensusrecommendationsandehealthtool
AT prangnellsimon appropriatereferralandselectionofpatientswithchronicpainforspinalcordstimulationeuropeanconsensusrecommendationsandehealthtool
AT deandresjose appropriatereferralandselectionofpatientswithchronicpainforspinalcordstimulationeuropeanconsensusrecommendationsandehealthtool
AT baranidharanganesan appropriatereferralandselectionofpatientswithchronicpainforspinalcordstimulationeuropeanconsensusrecommendationsandehealthtool
AT belaidhayat appropriatereferralandselectionofpatientswithchronicpainforspinalcordstimulationeuropeanconsensusrecommendationsandehealthtool
AT berryneil appropriatereferralandselectionofpatientswithchronicpainforspinalcordstimulationeuropeanconsensusrecommendationsandehealthtool
AT billetbart appropriatereferralandselectionofpatientswithchronicpainforspinalcordstimulationeuropeanconsensusrecommendationsandehealthtool
AT cooiljan appropriatereferralandselectionofpatientswithchronicpainforspinalcordstimulationeuropeanconsensusrecommendationsandehealthtool
AT decarolisgiuliano appropriatereferralandselectionofpatientswithchronicpainforspinalcordstimulationeuropeanconsensusrecommendationsandehealthtool
AT demartinilaura appropriatereferralandselectionofpatientswithchronicpainforspinalcordstimulationeuropeanconsensusrecommendationsandehealthtool
AT eldabesam appropriatereferralandselectionofpatientswithchronicpainforspinalcordstimulationeuropeanconsensusrecommendationsandehealthtool
AT gatzinskykliment appropriatereferralandselectionofpatientswithchronicpainforspinalcordstimulationeuropeanconsensusrecommendationsandehealthtool
AT kallewaardjanw appropriatereferralandselectionofpatientswithchronicpainforspinalcordstimulationeuropeanconsensusrecommendationsandehealthtool
AT meierkaare appropriatereferralandselectionofpatientswithchronicpainforspinalcordstimulationeuropeanconsensusrecommendationsandehealthtool
AT parolimery appropriatereferralandselectionofpatientswithchronicpainforspinalcordstimulationeuropeanconsensusrecommendationsandehealthtool
AT starkangela appropriatereferralandselectionofpatientswithchronicpainforspinalcordstimulationeuropeanconsensusrecommendationsandehealthtool
AT winkelmullermatthias appropriatereferralandselectionofpatientswithchronicpainforspinalcordstimulationeuropeanconsensusrecommendationsandehealthtool
AT stoevelaarherman appropriatereferralandselectionofpatientswithchronicpainforspinalcordstimulationeuropeanconsensusrecommendationsandehealthtool