Cargando…
A Comparative Review of Electrolytes for Organic‐Material‐Based Energy‐Storage Devices Employing Solid Electrodes and Redox Fluids
Electrolyte chemistry is critical for any energy‐storage device. Low‐cost and sustainable rechargeable batteries based on organic redox‐active materials are of great interest to tackle resource and performance limitations of current batteries with metal‐based active materials. Organic active materia...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318708/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31995281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201903382 |
_version_ | 1783550915222962176 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Ruiyong Bresser, Dominic Saraf, Mohit Gerlach, Patrick Balducci, Andrea Kunz, Simon Schröder, Daniel Passerini, Stefano Chen, Jun |
author_facet | Chen, Ruiyong Bresser, Dominic Saraf, Mohit Gerlach, Patrick Balducci, Andrea Kunz, Simon Schröder, Daniel Passerini, Stefano Chen, Jun |
author_sort | Chen, Ruiyong |
collection | PubMed |
description | Electrolyte chemistry is critical for any energy‐storage device. Low‐cost and sustainable rechargeable batteries based on organic redox‐active materials are of great interest to tackle resource and performance limitations of current batteries with metal‐based active materials. Organic active materials can be used not only as solid electrodes in the classic lithium‐ion battery (LIB) setup, but also as redox fluids in redox‐flow batteries (RFBs). Accordingly, they have suitability for mobile and stationary applications, respectively. Herein, different types of electrolytes, recent advances for designing better performing electrolytes, and remaining scientific challenges are discussed and summarized. Due to different configurations and requirements between LIBs and RFBs, the similarities and differences for choosing suitable electrolytes are discussed. Both general and specific strategies for promoting the utilization of organic active materials are covered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7318708 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73187082020-06-29 A Comparative Review of Electrolytes for Organic‐Material‐Based Energy‐Storage Devices Employing Solid Electrodes and Redox Fluids Chen, Ruiyong Bresser, Dominic Saraf, Mohit Gerlach, Patrick Balducci, Andrea Kunz, Simon Schröder, Daniel Passerini, Stefano Chen, Jun ChemSusChem Minireviews Electrolyte chemistry is critical for any energy‐storage device. Low‐cost and sustainable rechargeable batteries based on organic redox‐active materials are of great interest to tackle resource and performance limitations of current batteries with metal‐based active materials. Organic active materials can be used not only as solid electrodes in the classic lithium‐ion battery (LIB) setup, but also as redox fluids in redox‐flow batteries (RFBs). Accordingly, they have suitability for mobile and stationary applications, respectively. Herein, different types of electrolytes, recent advances for designing better performing electrolytes, and remaining scientific challenges are discussed and summarized. Due to different configurations and requirements between LIBs and RFBs, the similarities and differences for choosing suitable electrolytes are discussed. Both general and specific strategies for promoting the utilization of organic active materials are covered. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-03-20 2020-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7318708/ /pubmed/31995281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201903382 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Minireviews Chen, Ruiyong Bresser, Dominic Saraf, Mohit Gerlach, Patrick Balducci, Andrea Kunz, Simon Schröder, Daniel Passerini, Stefano Chen, Jun A Comparative Review of Electrolytes for Organic‐Material‐Based Energy‐Storage Devices Employing Solid Electrodes and Redox Fluids |
title | A Comparative Review of Electrolytes for Organic‐Material‐Based Energy‐Storage Devices Employing Solid Electrodes and Redox Fluids |
title_full | A Comparative Review of Electrolytes for Organic‐Material‐Based Energy‐Storage Devices Employing Solid Electrodes and Redox Fluids |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Review of Electrolytes for Organic‐Material‐Based Energy‐Storage Devices Employing Solid Electrodes and Redox Fluids |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Review of Electrolytes for Organic‐Material‐Based Energy‐Storage Devices Employing Solid Electrodes and Redox Fluids |
title_short | A Comparative Review of Electrolytes for Organic‐Material‐Based Energy‐Storage Devices Employing Solid Electrodes and Redox Fluids |
title_sort | comparative review of electrolytes for organic‐material‐based energy‐storage devices employing solid electrodes and redox fluids |
topic | Minireviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318708/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31995281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201903382 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenruiyong acomparativereviewofelectrolytesfororganicmaterialbasedenergystoragedevicesemployingsolidelectrodesandredoxfluids AT bresserdominic acomparativereviewofelectrolytesfororganicmaterialbasedenergystoragedevicesemployingsolidelectrodesandredoxfluids AT sarafmohit acomparativereviewofelectrolytesfororganicmaterialbasedenergystoragedevicesemployingsolidelectrodesandredoxfluids AT gerlachpatrick acomparativereviewofelectrolytesfororganicmaterialbasedenergystoragedevicesemployingsolidelectrodesandredoxfluids AT balducciandrea acomparativereviewofelectrolytesfororganicmaterialbasedenergystoragedevicesemployingsolidelectrodesandredoxfluids AT kunzsimon acomparativereviewofelectrolytesfororganicmaterialbasedenergystoragedevicesemployingsolidelectrodesandredoxfluids AT schroderdaniel acomparativereviewofelectrolytesfororganicmaterialbasedenergystoragedevicesemployingsolidelectrodesandredoxfluids AT passerinistefano acomparativereviewofelectrolytesfororganicmaterialbasedenergystoragedevicesemployingsolidelectrodesandredoxfluids AT chenjun acomparativereviewofelectrolytesfororganicmaterialbasedenergystoragedevicesemployingsolidelectrodesandredoxfluids AT chenruiyong comparativereviewofelectrolytesfororganicmaterialbasedenergystoragedevicesemployingsolidelectrodesandredoxfluids AT bresserdominic comparativereviewofelectrolytesfororganicmaterialbasedenergystoragedevicesemployingsolidelectrodesandredoxfluids AT sarafmohit comparativereviewofelectrolytesfororganicmaterialbasedenergystoragedevicesemployingsolidelectrodesandredoxfluids AT gerlachpatrick comparativereviewofelectrolytesfororganicmaterialbasedenergystoragedevicesemployingsolidelectrodesandredoxfluids AT balducciandrea comparativereviewofelectrolytesfororganicmaterialbasedenergystoragedevicesemployingsolidelectrodesandredoxfluids AT kunzsimon comparativereviewofelectrolytesfororganicmaterialbasedenergystoragedevicesemployingsolidelectrodesandredoxfluids AT schroderdaniel comparativereviewofelectrolytesfororganicmaterialbasedenergystoragedevicesemployingsolidelectrodesandredoxfluids AT passerinistefano comparativereviewofelectrolytesfororganicmaterialbasedenergystoragedevicesemployingsolidelectrodesandredoxfluids AT chenjun comparativereviewofelectrolytesfororganicmaterialbasedenergystoragedevicesemployingsolidelectrodesandredoxfluids |