Cargando…

A Comparative Review of Electrolytes for Organic‐Material‐Based Energy‐Storage Devices Employing Solid Electrodes and Redox Fluids

Electrolyte chemistry is critical for any energy‐storage device. Low‐cost and sustainable rechargeable batteries based on organic redox‐active materials are of great interest to tackle resource and performance limitations of current batteries with metal‐based active materials. Organic active materia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Ruiyong, Bresser, Dominic, Saraf, Mohit, Gerlach, Patrick, Balducci, Andrea, Kunz, Simon, Schröder, Daniel, Passerini, Stefano, Chen, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31995281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201903382
_version_ 1783550915222962176
author Chen, Ruiyong
Bresser, Dominic
Saraf, Mohit
Gerlach, Patrick
Balducci, Andrea
Kunz, Simon
Schröder, Daniel
Passerini, Stefano
Chen, Jun
author_facet Chen, Ruiyong
Bresser, Dominic
Saraf, Mohit
Gerlach, Patrick
Balducci, Andrea
Kunz, Simon
Schröder, Daniel
Passerini, Stefano
Chen, Jun
author_sort Chen, Ruiyong
collection PubMed
description Electrolyte chemistry is critical for any energy‐storage device. Low‐cost and sustainable rechargeable batteries based on organic redox‐active materials are of great interest to tackle resource and performance limitations of current batteries with metal‐based active materials. Organic active materials can be used not only as solid electrodes in the classic lithium‐ion battery (LIB) setup, but also as redox fluids in redox‐flow batteries (RFBs). Accordingly, they have suitability for mobile and stationary applications, respectively. Herein, different types of electrolytes, recent advances for designing better performing electrolytes, and remaining scientific challenges are discussed and summarized. Due to different configurations and requirements between LIBs and RFBs, the similarities and differences for choosing suitable electrolytes are discussed. Both general and specific strategies for promoting the utilization of organic active materials are covered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7318708
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73187082020-06-29 A Comparative Review of Electrolytes for Organic‐Material‐Based Energy‐Storage Devices Employing Solid Electrodes and Redox Fluids Chen, Ruiyong Bresser, Dominic Saraf, Mohit Gerlach, Patrick Balducci, Andrea Kunz, Simon Schröder, Daniel Passerini, Stefano Chen, Jun ChemSusChem Minireviews Electrolyte chemistry is critical for any energy‐storage device. Low‐cost and sustainable rechargeable batteries based on organic redox‐active materials are of great interest to tackle resource and performance limitations of current batteries with metal‐based active materials. Organic active materials can be used not only as solid electrodes in the classic lithium‐ion battery (LIB) setup, but also as redox fluids in redox‐flow batteries (RFBs). Accordingly, they have suitability for mobile and stationary applications, respectively. Herein, different types of electrolytes, recent advances for designing better performing electrolytes, and remaining scientific challenges are discussed and summarized. Due to different configurations and requirements between LIBs and RFBs, the similarities and differences for choosing suitable electrolytes are discussed. Both general and specific strategies for promoting the utilization of organic active materials are covered. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-03-20 2020-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7318708/ /pubmed/31995281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201903382 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Minireviews
Chen, Ruiyong
Bresser, Dominic
Saraf, Mohit
Gerlach, Patrick
Balducci, Andrea
Kunz, Simon
Schröder, Daniel
Passerini, Stefano
Chen, Jun
A Comparative Review of Electrolytes for Organic‐Material‐Based Energy‐Storage Devices Employing Solid Electrodes and Redox Fluids
title A Comparative Review of Electrolytes for Organic‐Material‐Based Energy‐Storage Devices Employing Solid Electrodes and Redox Fluids
title_full A Comparative Review of Electrolytes for Organic‐Material‐Based Energy‐Storage Devices Employing Solid Electrodes and Redox Fluids
title_fullStr A Comparative Review of Electrolytes for Organic‐Material‐Based Energy‐Storage Devices Employing Solid Electrodes and Redox Fluids
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Review of Electrolytes for Organic‐Material‐Based Energy‐Storage Devices Employing Solid Electrodes and Redox Fluids
title_short A Comparative Review of Electrolytes for Organic‐Material‐Based Energy‐Storage Devices Employing Solid Electrodes and Redox Fluids
title_sort comparative review of electrolytes for organic‐material‐based energy‐storage devices employing solid electrodes and redox fluids
topic Minireviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31995281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201903382
work_keys_str_mv AT chenruiyong acomparativereviewofelectrolytesfororganicmaterialbasedenergystoragedevicesemployingsolidelectrodesandredoxfluids
AT bresserdominic acomparativereviewofelectrolytesfororganicmaterialbasedenergystoragedevicesemployingsolidelectrodesandredoxfluids
AT sarafmohit acomparativereviewofelectrolytesfororganicmaterialbasedenergystoragedevicesemployingsolidelectrodesandredoxfluids
AT gerlachpatrick acomparativereviewofelectrolytesfororganicmaterialbasedenergystoragedevicesemployingsolidelectrodesandredoxfluids
AT balducciandrea acomparativereviewofelectrolytesfororganicmaterialbasedenergystoragedevicesemployingsolidelectrodesandredoxfluids
AT kunzsimon acomparativereviewofelectrolytesfororganicmaterialbasedenergystoragedevicesemployingsolidelectrodesandredoxfluids
AT schroderdaniel acomparativereviewofelectrolytesfororganicmaterialbasedenergystoragedevicesemployingsolidelectrodesandredoxfluids
AT passerinistefano acomparativereviewofelectrolytesfororganicmaterialbasedenergystoragedevicesemployingsolidelectrodesandredoxfluids
AT chenjun acomparativereviewofelectrolytesfororganicmaterialbasedenergystoragedevicesemployingsolidelectrodesandredoxfluids
AT chenruiyong comparativereviewofelectrolytesfororganicmaterialbasedenergystoragedevicesemployingsolidelectrodesandredoxfluids
AT bresserdominic comparativereviewofelectrolytesfororganicmaterialbasedenergystoragedevicesemployingsolidelectrodesandredoxfluids
AT sarafmohit comparativereviewofelectrolytesfororganicmaterialbasedenergystoragedevicesemployingsolidelectrodesandredoxfluids
AT gerlachpatrick comparativereviewofelectrolytesfororganicmaterialbasedenergystoragedevicesemployingsolidelectrodesandredoxfluids
AT balducciandrea comparativereviewofelectrolytesfororganicmaterialbasedenergystoragedevicesemployingsolidelectrodesandredoxfluids
AT kunzsimon comparativereviewofelectrolytesfororganicmaterialbasedenergystoragedevicesemployingsolidelectrodesandredoxfluids
AT schroderdaniel comparativereviewofelectrolytesfororganicmaterialbasedenergystoragedevicesemployingsolidelectrodesandredoxfluids
AT passerinistefano comparativereviewofelectrolytesfororganicmaterialbasedenergystoragedevicesemployingsolidelectrodesandredoxfluids
AT chenjun comparativereviewofelectrolytesfororganicmaterialbasedenergystoragedevicesemployingsolidelectrodesandredoxfluids