Cargando…
Expert opinion on the use of cladribine tablets in clinical practice
BACKGROUND: Gaps in current product labels and a lack of detailed clinical guidelines leaves clinicians’ questions on the practical management of patients receiving cladribine tablets for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) unanswered. We describe a consensus-based programme led by in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318823/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32636933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756286420935019 |
_version_ | 1783550938428997632 |
---|---|
author | Sørensen, Per Soelberg Centonze, Diego Giovannoni, Gavin Montalban, Xavier Selchen, Daniel Vermersch, Patrick Wiendl, Heinz Yamout, Bassem Salloukh, Hashem Rieckmann, Peter |
author_facet | Sørensen, Per Soelberg Centonze, Diego Giovannoni, Gavin Montalban, Xavier Selchen, Daniel Vermersch, Patrick Wiendl, Heinz Yamout, Bassem Salloukh, Hashem Rieckmann, Peter |
author_sort | Sørensen, Per Soelberg |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Gaps in current product labels and a lack of detailed clinical guidelines leaves clinicians’ questions on the practical management of patients receiving cladribine tablets for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) unanswered. We describe a consensus-based programme led by international MS experts with the aim of providing recommendations to support the use of cladribine tablets in clinical practice. METHODS: A steering committee (SC) of nine international MS experts led the programme and developed 11 clinical questions concerning the practical use of cladribine tablets. Statements to address each question were drafted using available evidence, expert experiences and perspectives from the SC and an extended faculty of 33 MS experts, representing 19 countries. Consensus on recommendations was achieved when ⩾75% of respondents expressed an agreement score of 7–9, on a 9-point scale. RESULTS: Consensus was achieved on 46 out of 47 recommendations. Expert-agreed practical recommendations are provided on topics including: the definition of highly active disease; patterns of treatment response and suboptimal response with cladribine tablets; management of pregnancy planning and malignancy risk, infection risk and immune function, and switching to and from cladribine tablets. CONCLUSION: These expert recommendations provide up-to-date relevant guidance on the use of cladribine tablets in clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7318823 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73188232020-07-06 Expert opinion on the use of cladribine tablets in clinical practice Sørensen, Per Soelberg Centonze, Diego Giovannoni, Gavin Montalban, Xavier Selchen, Daniel Vermersch, Patrick Wiendl, Heinz Yamout, Bassem Salloukh, Hashem Rieckmann, Peter Ther Adv Neurol Disord Review BACKGROUND: Gaps in current product labels and a lack of detailed clinical guidelines leaves clinicians’ questions on the practical management of patients receiving cladribine tablets for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) unanswered. We describe a consensus-based programme led by international MS experts with the aim of providing recommendations to support the use of cladribine tablets in clinical practice. METHODS: A steering committee (SC) of nine international MS experts led the programme and developed 11 clinical questions concerning the practical use of cladribine tablets. Statements to address each question were drafted using available evidence, expert experiences and perspectives from the SC and an extended faculty of 33 MS experts, representing 19 countries. Consensus on recommendations was achieved when ⩾75% of respondents expressed an agreement score of 7–9, on a 9-point scale. RESULTS: Consensus was achieved on 46 out of 47 recommendations. Expert-agreed practical recommendations are provided on topics including: the definition of highly active disease; patterns of treatment response and suboptimal response with cladribine tablets; management of pregnancy planning and malignancy risk, infection risk and immune function, and switching to and from cladribine tablets. CONCLUSION: These expert recommendations provide up-to-date relevant guidance on the use of cladribine tablets in clinical practice. SAGE Publications 2020-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7318823/ /pubmed/32636933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756286420935019 Text en © The Author(s), 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Review Sørensen, Per Soelberg Centonze, Diego Giovannoni, Gavin Montalban, Xavier Selchen, Daniel Vermersch, Patrick Wiendl, Heinz Yamout, Bassem Salloukh, Hashem Rieckmann, Peter Expert opinion on the use of cladribine tablets in clinical practice |
title | Expert opinion on the use of cladribine tablets in clinical practice |
title_full | Expert opinion on the use of cladribine tablets in clinical practice |
title_fullStr | Expert opinion on the use of cladribine tablets in clinical practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Expert opinion on the use of cladribine tablets in clinical practice |
title_short | Expert opinion on the use of cladribine tablets in clinical practice |
title_sort | expert opinion on the use of cladribine tablets in clinical practice |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318823/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32636933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756286420935019 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sørensenpersoelberg expertopinionontheuseofcladribinetabletsinclinicalpractice AT centonzediego expertopinionontheuseofcladribinetabletsinclinicalpractice AT giovannonigavin expertopinionontheuseofcladribinetabletsinclinicalpractice AT montalbanxavier expertopinionontheuseofcladribinetabletsinclinicalpractice AT selchendaniel expertopinionontheuseofcladribinetabletsinclinicalpractice AT vermerschpatrick expertopinionontheuseofcladribinetabletsinclinicalpractice AT wiendlheinz expertopinionontheuseofcladribinetabletsinclinicalpractice AT yamoutbassem expertopinionontheuseofcladribinetabletsinclinicalpractice AT salloukhhashem expertopinionontheuseofcladribinetabletsinclinicalpractice AT rieckmannpeter expertopinionontheuseofcladribinetabletsinclinicalpractice |