Cargando…

Unmet needs and recommendations to improve meningioma care through patient, partner, and health care provider input: a mixed-method study

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that lack of ongoing registration of patient-centered outcomes has resulted in existing care trajectories that have not been optimized for sequelae experienced by meningioma patients. This study aimed to evaluate the structure of current meningioma care and identify...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zamanipoor Najafabadi, Amir H, van de Mortel, Johannes P M, Lobatto, Daniel J, Brandsma, Dieta R, Peul, Wilco C, Biermasz, Nienke, Taphoorn, Martin J B, Dirven, Linda, van Furth, Wouter R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32617172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nop/npz055
_version_ 1783550944531709952
author Zamanipoor Najafabadi, Amir H
van de Mortel, Johannes P M
Lobatto, Daniel J
Brandsma, Dieta R
Peul, Wilco C
Biermasz, Nienke
Taphoorn, Martin J B
Dirven, Linda
van Furth, Wouter R
author_facet Zamanipoor Najafabadi, Amir H
van de Mortel, Johannes P M
Lobatto, Daniel J
Brandsma, Dieta R
Peul, Wilco C
Biermasz, Nienke
Taphoorn, Martin J B
Dirven, Linda
van Furth, Wouter R
author_sort Zamanipoor Najafabadi, Amir H
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that lack of ongoing registration of patient-centered outcomes has resulted in existing care trajectories that have not been optimized for sequelae experienced by meningioma patients. This study aimed to evaluate the structure of current meningioma care and identify issues and potential high-impact improvement initiatives. METHODS: Using the grounded theory approach, a thematic framework was constructed based on the Dutch Comprehensive Cancer Organisation survey about issues in meningioma care trajectories. This framework was used during 3 semistructured interviews and 2 focus groups with patient-partner dyads (n = 16 participants), and 2 focus groups with health care providers (n = 11 participants) to assess issues in current meningioma care trajectories and possible solutions, including barriers to and facilitators for implementation. RESULTS: Identified issues (n = 18 issues) were categorized into 3 themes: availability and provision of information, care and support, and screening for (neurocognitive) rehabilitation. A lack of information about the intervention and possible outcomes or complications, lack of support after treatment focusing on bodily and psychological functions, and reintegration into society were considered most important. Sixteen solutions were suggested, such as appointment of case managers (solution for 11/18 issues, 61%), assessment and treatment by physiatrists (22%), and routine use of patient-reported outcome measures for patient monitoring (17%). Barriers for these solutions were lack of budget, capacity, technology infrastructure, and qualified personnel with knowledge about issues experienced by meningioma patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified issues in current multidisciplinary meningioma care that are considered unmet needs by patients, partners, and health care providers and could guide innovation of care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7318860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73188602020-07-01 Unmet needs and recommendations to improve meningioma care through patient, partner, and health care provider input: a mixed-method study Zamanipoor Najafabadi, Amir H van de Mortel, Johannes P M Lobatto, Daniel J Brandsma, Dieta R Peul, Wilco C Biermasz, Nienke Taphoorn, Martin J B Dirven, Linda van Furth, Wouter R Neurooncol Pract Original Articles BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that lack of ongoing registration of patient-centered outcomes has resulted in existing care trajectories that have not been optimized for sequelae experienced by meningioma patients. This study aimed to evaluate the structure of current meningioma care and identify issues and potential high-impact improvement initiatives. METHODS: Using the grounded theory approach, a thematic framework was constructed based on the Dutch Comprehensive Cancer Organisation survey about issues in meningioma care trajectories. This framework was used during 3 semistructured interviews and 2 focus groups with patient-partner dyads (n = 16 participants), and 2 focus groups with health care providers (n = 11 participants) to assess issues in current meningioma care trajectories and possible solutions, including barriers to and facilitators for implementation. RESULTS: Identified issues (n = 18 issues) were categorized into 3 themes: availability and provision of information, care and support, and screening for (neurocognitive) rehabilitation. A lack of information about the intervention and possible outcomes or complications, lack of support after treatment focusing on bodily and psychological functions, and reintegration into society were considered most important. Sixteen solutions were suggested, such as appointment of case managers (solution for 11/18 issues, 61%), assessment and treatment by physiatrists (22%), and routine use of patient-reported outcome measures for patient monitoring (17%). Barriers for these solutions were lack of budget, capacity, technology infrastructure, and qualified personnel with knowledge about issues experienced by meningioma patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified issues in current multidisciplinary meningioma care that are considered unmet needs by patients, partners, and health care providers and could guide innovation of care. Oxford University Press 2020-03 2019-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7318860/ /pubmed/32617172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nop/npz055 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Articles
Zamanipoor Najafabadi, Amir H
van de Mortel, Johannes P M
Lobatto, Daniel J
Brandsma, Dieta R
Peul, Wilco C
Biermasz, Nienke
Taphoorn, Martin J B
Dirven, Linda
van Furth, Wouter R
Unmet needs and recommendations to improve meningioma care through patient, partner, and health care provider input: a mixed-method study
title Unmet needs and recommendations to improve meningioma care through patient, partner, and health care provider input: a mixed-method study
title_full Unmet needs and recommendations to improve meningioma care through patient, partner, and health care provider input: a mixed-method study
title_fullStr Unmet needs and recommendations to improve meningioma care through patient, partner, and health care provider input: a mixed-method study
title_full_unstemmed Unmet needs and recommendations to improve meningioma care through patient, partner, and health care provider input: a mixed-method study
title_short Unmet needs and recommendations to improve meningioma care through patient, partner, and health care provider input: a mixed-method study
title_sort unmet needs and recommendations to improve meningioma care through patient, partner, and health care provider input: a mixed-method study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32617172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nop/npz055
work_keys_str_mv AT zamanipoornajafabadiamirh unmetneedsandrecommendationstoimprovemeningiomacarethroughpatientpartnerandhealthcareproviderinputamixedmethodstudy
AT vandemorteljohannespm unmetneedsandrecommendationstoimprovemeningiomacarethroughpatientpartnerandhealthcareproviderinputamixedmethodstudy
AT lobattodanielj unmetneedsandrecommendationstoimprovemeningiomacarethroughpatientpartnerandhealthcareproviderinputamixedmethodstudy
AT brandsmadietar unmetneedsandrecommendationstoimprovemeningiomacarethroughpatientpartnerandhealthcareproviderinputamixedmethodstudy
AT peulwilcoc unmetneedsandrecommendationstoimprovemeningiomacarethroughpatientpartnerandhealthcareproviderinputamixedmethodstudy
AT biermasznienke unmetneedsandrecommendationstoimprovemeningiomacarethroughpatientpartnerandhealthcareproviderinputamixedmethodstudy
AT taphoornmartinjb unmetneedsandrecommendationstoimprovemeningiomacarethroughpatientpartnerandhealthcareproviderinputamixedmethodstudy
AT dirvenlinda unmetneedsandrecommendationstoimprovemeningiomacarethroughpatientpartnerandhealthcareproviderinputamixedmethodstudy
AT vanfurthwouterr unmetneedsandrecommendationstoimprovemeningiomacarethroughpatientpartnerandhealthcareproviderinputamixedmethodstudy