Cargando…

Longitudinal Case Study of Regression-Based Hand Prosthesis Control in Daily Life

Hand prostheses are usually controlled by electromyographic (EMG) signals from the remnant muscles of the residual limb. Most prostheses used today are controlled with very simple techniques using only two EMG electrodes that allow to control a single prosthetic function at a time only. Recently, mo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hahne, Janne M., Wilke, Meike A., Koppe, Mario, Farina, Dario, Schilling, Arndt F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32636734
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00600
_version_ 1783550951534100480
author Hahne, Janne M.
Wilke, Meike A.
Koppe, Mario
Farina, Dario
Schilling, Arndt F.
author_facet Hahne, Janne M.
Wilke, Meike A.
Koppe, Mario
Farina, Dario
Schilling, Arndt F.
author_sort Hahne, Janne M.
collection PubMed
description Hand prostheses are usually controlled by electromyographic (EMG) signals from the remnant muscles of the residual limb. Most prostheses used today are controlled with very simple techniques using only two EMG electrodes that allow to control a single prosthetic function at a time only. Recently, modern prosthesis controllers based on EMG classification, have become clinically available, which allow to directly access more functions, but still in a sequential manner only. We have recently shown in laboratory tests that a regression-based mapping from EMG signals into prosthetic control commands allows for a simultaneous activation of two functions and an independent control of their velocities with high reliability. Here we aimed to study how such regression-based control performs in daily life in a two-month case study. The performance is evaluated in functional tests and with a questionnaire at the beginning and the end of this phase and compared with the participant’s own prosthesis, controlled with a classical approach. Already 1 day after training of the regression model, the participant with transradial amputation outperformed the performance achieved with his own Michelangelo hand in two out of three functional metrics. No retraining of the model was required during the entire study duration. During the use of the system at home, the performance improved further and outperformed the conventional control in all three metrics. This study demonstrates that the high fidelity of linear regression-based prosthesis control is not restricted to a laboratory environment, but can be transferred to daily use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7318897
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73188972020-07-06 Longitudinal Case Study of Regression-Based Hand Prosthesis Control in Daily Life Hahne, Janne M. Wilke, Meike A. Koppe, Mario Farina, Dario Schilling, Arndt F. Front Neurosci Neuroscience Hand prostheses are usually controlled by electromyographic (EMG) signals from the remnant muscles of the residual limb. Most prostheses used today are controlled with very simple techniques using only two EMG electrodes that allow to control a single prosthetic function at a time only. Recently, modern prosthesis controllers based on EMG classification, have become clinically available, which allow to directly access more functions, but still in a sequential manner only. We have recently shown in laboratory tests that a regression-based mapping from EMG signals into prosthetic control commands allows for a simultaneous activation of two functions and an independent control of their velocities with high reliability. Here we aimed to study how such regression-based control performs in daily life in a two-month case study. The performance is evaluated in functional tests and with a questionnaire at the beginning and the end of this phase and compared with the participant’s own prosthesis, controlled with a classical approach. Already 1 day after training of the regression model, the participant with transradial amputation outperformed the performance achieved with his own Michelangelo hand in two out of three functional metrics. No retraining of the model was required during the entire study duration. During the use of the system at home, the performance improved further and outperformed the conventional control in all three metrics. This study demonstrates that the high fidelity of linear regression-based prosthesis control is not restricted to a laboratory environment, but can be transferred to daily use. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7318897/ /pubmed/32636734 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00600 Text en Copyright © 2020 Hahne, Wilke, Koppe, Farina and Schilling. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Hahne, Janne M.
Wilke, Meike A.
Koppe, Mario
Farina, Dario
Schilling, Arndt F.
Longitudinal Case Study of Regression-Based Hand Prosthesis Control in Daily Life
title Longitudinal Case Study of Regression-Based Hand Prosthesis Control in Daily Life
title_full Longitudinal Case Study of Regression-Based Hand Prosthesis Control in Daily Life
title_fullStr Longitudinal Case Study of Regression-Based Hand Prosthesis Control in Daily Life
title_full_unstemmed Longitudinal Case Study of Regression-Based Hand Prosthesis Control in Daily Life
title_short Longitudinal Case Study of Regression-Based Hand Prosthesis Control in Daily Life
title_sort longitudinal case study of regression-based hand prosthesis control in daily life
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32636734
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00600
work_keys_str_mv AT hahnejannem longitudinalcasestudyofregressionbasedhandprosthesiscontrolindailylife
AT wilkemeikea longitudinalcasestudyofregressionbasedhandprosthesiscontrolindailylife
AT koppemario longitudinalcasestudyofregressionbasedhandprosthesiscontrolindailylife
AT farinadario longitudinalcasestudyofregressionbasedhandprosthesiscontrolindailylife
AT schillingarndtf longitudinalcasestudyofregressionbasedhandprosthesiscontrolindailylife