Cargando…

Anonymous fecal sampling and NIRS studies of diet quality: Problem or opportunity?

Investigating the drivers of diet quality is a key issue in wildlife ecology and conservation. Fecal near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (f‐NIRS) is widely used to assess dietary quality since it allows for noninvasive, rapid, and low‐cost analysis of nutrients. Samples for f‐NIRS can be collecte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Corlatti, Luca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7319235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32607215
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6354
_version_ 1783551015050543104
author Corlatti, Luca
author_facet Corlatti, Luca
author_sort Corlatti, Luca
collection PubMed
description Investigating the drivers of diet quality is a key issue in wildlife ecology and conservation. Fecal near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (f‐NIRS) is widely used to assess dietary quality since it allows for noninvasive, rapid, and low‐cost analysis of nutrients. Samples for f‐NIRS can be collected and analyzed with or without knowledge of animal identities. While anonymous sampling allows to reduce the costs of individual identification, as it neither requires physical captures nor DNA genotyping, it neglects the potential effects of individual variation. As a consequence, regression models fitted to investigate the drivers of dietary quality may suffer severe issues of pseudoreplication. I investigated the relationship between crude protein and ecological predictors at different time periods to assess the level of individual heterogeneity in diet quality of 22 marked chamois Rupicapra rupicapra monitored over 2 years. Models with and without individual grouping effect were fitted to simulate identifiable and anonymous fecal sampling, and model estimates were compared to evaluate the consequences of anonymizing data collection and analysis. The variance explained by the individual random effect and the value of diet repeatability varied with seasons and peaked in winter. Despite the occurrence of individual variation in dietary quality, ecological parameter estimates under identifiable or anonymous sampling were consistently similar. This study suggests that anonymous fecal sampling may provide robust estimates of the relationship between dietary quality and ecological correlates. However, since the level of individual heterogeneity in dietary quality may vary with species‐ or study‐specific features, inconsequential pseudoreplication should not be assumed in other taxa. When individual differences are known to be inconsequential, anonymous sampling allows to optimize the trade‐off between sampling intensity and representativeness. When pseudoreplication is consequential, however, no conclusive remedy exists to effectively resolve nonindependence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7319235
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73192352020-06-29 Anonymous fecal sampling and NIRS studies of diet quality: Problem or opportunity? Corlatti, Luca Ecol Evol Original Research Investigating the drivers of diet quality is a key issue in wildlife ecology and conservation. Fecal near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (f‐NIRS) is widely used to assess dietary quality since it allows for noninvasive, rapid, and low‐cost analysis of nutrients. Samples for f‐NIRS can be collected and analyzed with or without knowledge of animal identities. While anonymous sampling allows to reduce the costs of individual identification, as it neither requires physical captures nor DNA genotyping, it neglects the potential effects of individual variation. As a consequence, regression models fitted to investigate the drivers of dietary quality may suffer severe issues of pseudoreplication. I investigated the relationship between crude protein and ecological predictors at different time periods to assess the level of individual heterogeneity in diet quality of 22 marked chamois Rupicapra rupicapra monitored over 2 years. Models with and without individual grouping effect were fitted to simulate identifiable and anonymous fecal sampling, and model estimates were compared to evaluate the consequences of anonymizing data collection and analysis. The variance explained by the individual random effect and the value of diet repeatability varied with seasons and peaked in winter. Despite the occurrence of individual variation in dietary quality, ecological parameter estimates under identifiable or anonymous sampling were consistently similar. This study suggests that anonymous fecal sampling may provide robust estimates of the relationship between dietary quality and ecological correlates. However, since the level of individual heterogeneity in dietary quality may vary with species‐ or study‐specific features, inconsequential pseudoreplication should not be assumed in other taxa. When individual differences are known to be inconsequential, anonymous sampling allows to optimize the trade‐off between sampling intensity and representativeness. When pseudoreplication is consequential, however, no conclusive remedy exists to effectively resolve nonindependence. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7319235/ /pubmed/32607215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6354 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Corlatti, Luca
Anonymous fecal sampling and NIRS studies of diet quality: Problem or opportunity?
title Anonymous fecal sampling and NIRS studies of diet quality: Problem or opportunity?
title_full Anonymous fecal sampling and NIRS studies of diet quality: Problem or opportunity?
title_fullStr Anonymous fecal sampling and NIRS studies of diet quality: Problem or opportunity?
title_full_unstemmed Anonymous fecal sampling and NIRS studies of diet quality: Problem or opportunity?
title_short Anonymous fecal sampling and NIRS studies of diet quality: Problem or opportunity?
title_sort anonymous fecal sampling and nirs studies of diet quality: problem or opportunity?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7319235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32607215
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6354
work_keys_str_mv AT corlattiluca anonymousfecalsamplingandnirsstudiesofdietqualityproblemoropportunity