Cargando…

Divergent selection on flowering phenology but not on floral morphology between two closely related orchids

Closely related species often differ in traits that influence reproductive success, suggesting that divergent selection on such traits contribute to the maintenance of species boundaries. Gymnadenia conopsea ss. and Gymnadenia densiflora are two closely related, perennial orchid species that differ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chapurlat, Elodie, Le Roncé, Iris, Ågren, Jon, Sletvold, Nina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7319237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32607187
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6312
_version_ 1783551015510867968
author Chapurlat, Elodie
Le Roncé, Iris
Ågren, Jon
Sletvold, Nina
author_facet Chapurlat, Elodie
Le Roncé, Iris
Ågren, Jon
Sletvold, Nina
author_sort Chapurlat, Elodie
collection PubMed
description Closely related species often differ in traits that influence reproductive success, suggesting that divergent selection on such traits contribute to the maintenance of species boundaries. Gymnadenia conopsea ss. and Gymnadenia densiflora are two closely related, perennial orchid species that differ in (a) floral traits important for pollination, including flowering phenology, floral display, and spur length, and (b) dominant pollinators. If plant–pollinator interactions contribute to the maintenance of trait differences between these two taxa, we expect current divergent selection on flowering phenology and floral morphology between the two species. We quantified phenotypic selection via female fitness in one year on flowering start, three floral display traits (plant height, number of flowers, and corolla size) and spur length, in six populations of G. conopsea s.s. and in four populations of G. densiflora. There was indication of divergent selection on flowering start in the expected direction, with selection for earlier flowering in two populations of the early‐flowering G. conopsea s.s. and for later flowering in one population of the late‐flowering G. densiflora. No divergent selection on floral morphology was detected, and there was no significant stabilizing selection on any trait in the two species. The results suggest ongoing adaptive differentiation of flowering phenology, strengthening this premating reproductive barrier between the two species. Synthesis: This study is among the first to test whether divergent selection on floral traits contribute to the maintenance of species differences between closely related plants. Phenological isolation confers a substantial potential for reproductive isolation, and divergent selection on flowering time can thus greatly influence reproductive isolation and adaptive differentiation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7319237
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73192372020-06-29 Divergent selection on flowering phenology but not on floral morphology between two closely related orchids Chapurlat, Elodie Le Roncé, Iris Ågren, Jon Sletvold, Nina Ecol Evol Original Research Closely related species often differ in traits that influence reproductive success, suggesting that divergent selection on such traits contribute to the maintenance of species boundaries. Gymnadenia conopsea ss. and Gymnadenia densiflora are two closely related, perennial orchid species that differ in (a) floral traits important for pollination, including flowering phenology, floral display, and spur length, and (b) dominant pollinators. If plant–pollinator interactions contribute to the maintenance of trait differences between these two taxa, we expect current divergent selection on flowering phenology and floral morphology between the two species. We quantified phenotypic selection via female fitness in one year on flowering start, three floral display traits (plant height, number of flowers, and corolla size) and spur length, in six populations of G. conopsea s.s. and in four populations of G. densiflora. There was indication of divergent selection on flowering start in the expected direction, with selection for earlier flowering in two populations of the early‐flowering G. conopsea s.s. and for later flowering in one population of the late‐flowering G. densiflora. No divergent selection on floral morphology was detected, and there was no significant stabilizing selection on any trait in the two species. The results suggest ongoing adaptive differentiation of flowering phenology, strengthening this premating reproductive barrier between the two species. Synthesis: This study is among the first to test whether divergent selection on floral traits contribute to the maintenance of species differences between closely related plants. Phenological isolation confers a substantial potential for reproductive isolation, and divergent selection on flowering time can thus greatly influence reproductive isolation and adaptive differentiation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7319237/ /pubmed/32607187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6312 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Chapurlat, Elodie
Le Roncé, Iris
Ågren, Jon
Sletvold, Nina
Divergent selection on flowering phenology but not on floral morphology between two closely related orchids
title Divergent selection on flowering phenology but not on floral morphology between two closely related orchids
title_full Divergent selection on flowering phenology but not on floral morphology between two closely related orchids
title_fullStr Divergent selection on flowering phenology but not on floral morphology between two closely related orchids
title_full_unstemmed Divergent selection on flowering phenology but not on floral morphology between two closely related orchids
title_short Divergent selection on flowering phenology but not on floral morphology between two closely related orchids
title_sort divergent selection on flowering phenology but not on floral morphology between two closely related orchids
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7319237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32607187
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6312
work_keys_str_mv AT chapurlatelodie divergentselectiononfloweringphenologybutnotonfloralmorphologybetweentwocloselyrelatedorchids
AT leronceiris divergentselectiononfloweringphenologybutnotonfloralmorphologybetweentwocloselyrelatedorchids
AT agrenjon divergentselectiononfloweringphenologybutnotonfloralmorphologybetweentwocloselyrelatedorchids
AT sletvoldnina divergentselectiononfloweringphenologybutnotonfloralmorphologybetweentwocloselyrelatedorchids