Cargando…
Divergent selection on flowering phenology but not on floral morphology between two closely related orchids
Closely related species often differ in traits that influence reproductive success, suggesting that divergent selection on such traits contribute to the maintenance of species boundaries. Gymnadenia conopsea ss. and Gymnadenia densiflora are two closely related, perennial orchid species that differ...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7319237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32607187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6312 |
_version_ | 1783551015510867968 |
---|---|
author | Chapurlat, Elodie Le Roncé, Iris Ågren, Jon Sletvold, Nina |
author_facet | Chapurlat, Elodie Le Roncé, Iris Ågren, Jon Sletvold, Nina |
author_sort | Chapurlat, Elodie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Closely related species often differ in traits that influence reproductive success, suggesting that divergent selection on such traits contribute to the maintenance of species boundaries. Gymnadenia conopsea ss. and Gymnadenia densiflora are two closely related, perennial orchid species that differ in (a) floral traits important for pollination, including flowering phenology, floral display, and spur length, and (b) dominant pollinators. If plant–pollinator interactions contribute to the maintenance of trait differences between these two taxa, we expect current divergent selection on flowering phenology and floral morphology between the two species. We quantified phenotypic selection via female fitness in one year on flowering start, three floral display traits (plant height, number of flowers, and corolla size) and spur length, in six populations of G. conopsea s.s. and in four populations of G. densiflora. There was indication of divergent selection on flowering start in the expected direction, with selection for earlier flowering in two populations of the early‐flowering G. conopsea s.s. and for later flowering in one population of the late‐flowering G. densiflora. No divergent selection on floral morphology was detected, and there was no significant stabilizing selection on any trait in the two species. The results suggest ongoing adaptive differentiation of flowering phenology, strengthening this premating reproductive barrier between the two species. Synthesis: This study is among the first to test whether divergent selection on floral traits contribute to the maintenance of species differences between closely related plants. Phenological isolation confers a substantial potential for reproductive isolation, and divergent selection on flowering time can thus greatly influence reproductive isolation and adaptive differentiation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7319237 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73192372020-06-29 Divergent selection on flowering phenology but not on floral morphology between two closely related orchids Chapurlat, Elodie Le Roncé, Iris Ågren, Jon Sletvold, Nina Ecol Evol Original Research Closely related species often differ in traits that influence reproductive success, suggesting that divergent selection on such traits contribute to the maintenance of species boundaries. Gymnadenia conopsea ss. and Gymnadenia densiflora are two closely related, perennial orchid species that differ in (a) floral traits important for pollination, including flowering phenology, floral display, and spur length, and (b) dominant pollinators. If plant–pollinator interactions contribute to the maintenance of trait differences between these two taxa, we expect current divergent selection on flowering phenology and floral morphology between the two species. We quantified phenotypic selection via female fitness in one year on flowering start, three floral display traits (plant height, number of flowers, and corolla size) and spur length, in six populations of G. conopsea s.s. and in four populations of G. densiflora. There was indication of divergent selection on flowering start in the expected direction, with selection for earlier flowering in two populations of the early‐flowering G. conopsea s.s. and for later flowering in one population of the late‐flowering G. densiflora. No divergent selection on floral morphology was detected, and there was no significant stabilizing selection on any trait in the two species. The results suggest ongoing adaptive differentiation of flowering phenology, strengthening this premating reproductive barrier between the two species. Synthesis: This study is among the first to test whether divergent selection on floral traits contribute to the maintenance of species differences between closely related plants. Phenological isolation confers a substantial potential for reproductive isolation, and divergent selection on flowering time can thus greatly influence reproductive isolation and adaptive differentiation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7319237/ /pubmed/32607187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6312 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Chapurlat, Elodie Le Roncé, Iris Ågren, Jon Sletvold, Nina Divergent selection on flowering phenology but not on floral morphology between two closely related orchids |
title | Divergent selection on flowering phenology but not on floral morphology between two closely related orchids |
title_full | Divergent selection on flowering phenology but not on floral morphology between two closely related orchids |
title_fullStr | Divergent selection on flowering phenology but not on floral morphology between two closely related orchids |
title_full_unstemmed | Divergent selection on flowering phenology but not on floral morphology between two closely related orchids |
title_short | Divergent selection on flowering phenology but not on floral morphology between two closely related orchids |
title_sort | divergent selection on flowering phenology but not on floral morphology between two closely related orchids |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7319237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32607187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6312 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chapurlatelodie divergentselectiononfloweringphenologybutnotonfloralmorphologybetweentwocloselyrelatedorchids AT leronceiris divergentselectiononfloweringphenologybutnotonfloralmorphologybetweentwocloselyrelatedorchids AT agrenjon divergentselectiononfloweringphenologybutnotonfloralmorphologybetweentwocloselyrelatedorchids AT sletvoldnina divergentselectiononfloweringphenologybutnotonfloralmorphologybetweentwocloselyrelatedorchids |