Cargando…
Line × tester analysis of maize grain yield under acid and non‐acid soil conditions
Soil acidity has received less attention than other biophysical stresses such as drought and low N, despite accounting for a considerable reduction in maize (Zea mays L.) productivity in many parts of southern Africa. The line × tester mating design was used to determine the general combining abilit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7319413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32612293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20009 |
_version_ | 1783551043393552384 |
---|---|
author | Mutimaamba, Charles MacRobert, John Cairns, Jill E. Magorokosho, Cosmos Ndhlela, Thokozile Mukungurutse, Collis Minnaar‐Ontong, Adré Labuschagne, Maryke |
author_facet | Mutimaamba, Charles MacRobert, John Cairns, Jill E. Magorokosho, Cosmos Ndhlela, Thokozile Mukungurutse, Collis Minnaar‐Ontong, Adré Labuschagne, Maryke |
author_sort | Mutimaamba, Charles |
collection | PubMed |
description | Soil acidity has received less attention than other biophysical stresses such as drought and low N, despite accounting for a considerable reduction in maize (Zea mays L.) productivity in many parts of southern Africa. The line × tester mating design was used to determine the general combining ability (GCA) for grain yield of 14 maize inbred lines and the specific combining ability (SCA) of their corresponding crosses. Thirty‐three single‐cross hybrids were evaluated under acid and optimum soils across 11 environments over three seasons. Across environments, mean grain yield reduction ranged from 11 to 37% due to low pH. Additive gene action was more important than nonadditive gene action for grain yield under both soil conditions. Tester GCA effects were larger for grain yield than GCA effects of lines and SCA effects of crosses for both soil conditions. Tester GCA effects were less sensitive to environmental fluctuations than line GCA effects and SCA effects of crosses. Cross combinations with desirable SCA effects for grain yield were associated with high per se grain yield, which suggests that SCA was a good predictor of grain yield in this study. These crosses consisted of good × good and good × poor general combiners, which indicates that GCA was a good predictor of grain yield. Therefore, priority should be given for yield selection in progenies and hybridization of specific crosses with desirable SCA when breeding acid‐soil‐tolerant maize. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7319413 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73194132020-06-29 Line × tester analysis of maize grain yield under acid and non‐acid soil conditions Mutimaamba, Charles MacRobert, John Cairns, Jill E. Magorokosho, Cosmos Ndhlela, Thokozile Mukungurutse, Collis Minnaar‐Ontong, Adré Labuschagne, Maryke Crop Sci ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLES Soil acidity has received less attention than other biophysical stresses such as drought and low N, despite accounting for a considerable reduction in maize (Zea mays L.) productivity in many parts of southern Africa. The line × tester mating design was used to determine the general combining ability (GCA) for grain yield of 14 maize inbred lines and the specific combining ability (SCA) of their corresponding crosses. Thirty‐three single‐cross hybrids were evaluated under acid and optimum soils across 11 environments over three seasons. Across environments, mean grain yield reduction ranged from 11 to 37% due to low pH. Additive gene action was more important than nonadditive gene action for grain yield under both soil conditions. Tester GCA effects were larger for grain yield than GCA effects of lines and SCA effects of crosses for both soil conditions. Tester GCA effects were less sensitive to environmental fluctuations than line GCA effects and SCA effects of crosses. Cross combinations with desirable SCA effects for grain yield were associated with high per se grain yield, which suggests that SCA was a good predictor of grain yield in this study. These crosses consisted of good × good and good × poor general combiners, which indicates that GCA was a good predictor of grain yield. Therefore, priority should be given for yield selection in progenies and hybridization of specific crosses with desirable SCA when breeding acid‐soil‐tolerant maize. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-02-25 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7319413/ /pubmed/32612293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20009 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Crop Science published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Crop Science Society of America This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLES Mutimaamba, Charles MacRobert, John Cairns, Jill E. Magorokosho, Cosmos Ndhlela, Thokozile Mukungurutse, Collis Minnaar‐Ontong, Adré Labuschagne, Maryke Line × tester analysis of maize grain yield under acid and non‐acid soil conditions |
title | Line × tester analysis of maize grain yield under acid and non‐acid soil conditions |
title_full | Line × tester analysis of maize grain yield under acid and non‐acid soil conditions |
title_fullStr | Line × tester analysis of maize grain yield under acid and non‐acid soil conditions |
title_full_unstemmed | Line × tester analysis of maize grain yield under acid and non‐acid soil conditions |
title_short | Line × tester analysis of maize grain yield under acid and non‐acid soil conditions |
title_sort | line × tester analysis of maize grain yield under acid and non‐acid soil conditions |
topic | ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLES |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7319413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32612293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mutimaambacharles linetesteranalysisofmaizegrainyieldunderacidandnonacidsoilconditions AT macrobertjohn linetesteranalysisofmaizegrainyieldunderacidandnonacidsoilconditions AT cairnsjille linetesteranalysisofmaizegrainyieldunderacidandnonacidsoilconditions AT magorokoshocosmos linetesteranalysisofmaizegrainyieldunderacidandnonacidsoilconditions AT ndhlelathokozile linetesteranalysisofmaizegrainyieldunderacidandnonacidsoilconditions AT mukungurutsecollis linetesteranalysisofmaizegrainyieldunderacidandnonacidsoilconditions AT minnaarontongadre linetesteranalysisofmaizegrainyieldunderacidandnonacidsoilconditions AT labuschagnemaryke linetesteranalysisofmaizegrainyieldunderacidandnonacidsoilconditions |