Cargando…

Line × tester analysis of maize grain yield under acid and non‐acid soil conditions

Soil acidity has received less attention than other biophysical stresses such as drought and low N, despite accounting for a considerable reduction in maize (Zea mays L.) productivity in many parts of southern Africa. The line × tester mating design was used to determine the general combining abilit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mutimaamba, Charles, MacRobert, John, Cairns, Jill E., Magorokosho, Cosmos, Ndhlela, Thokozile, Mukungurutse, Collis, Minnaar‐Ontong, Adré, Labuschagne, Maryke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7319413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32612293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20009
_version_ 1783551043393552384
author Mutimaamba, Charles
MacRobert, John
Cairns, Jill E.
Magorokosho, Cosmos
Ndhlela, Thokozile
Mukungurutse, Collis
Minnaar‐Ontong, Adré
Labuschagne, Maryke
author_facet Mutimaamba, Charles
MacRobert, John
Cairns, Jill E.
Magorokosho, Cosmos
Ndhlela, Thokozile
Mukungurutse, Collis
Minnaar‐Ontong, Adré
Labuschagne, Maryke
author_sort Mutimaamba, Charles
collection PubMed
description Soil acidity has received less attention than other biophysical stresses such as drought and low N, despite accounting for a considerable reduction in maize (Zea mays L.) productivity in many parts of southern Africa. The line × tester mating design was used to determine the general combining ability (GCA) for grain yield of 14 maize inbred lines and the specific combining ability (SCA) of their corresponding crosses. Thirty‐three single‐cross hybrids were evaluated under acid and optimum soils across 11 environments over three seasons. Across environments, mean grain yield reduction ranged from 11 to 37% due to low pH. Additive gene action was more important than nonadditive gene action for grain yield under both soil conditions. Tester GCA effects were larger for grain yield than GCA effects of lines and SCA effects of crosses for both soil conditions. Tester GCA effects were less sensitive to environmental fluctuations than line GCA effects and SCA effects of crosses. Cross combinations with desirable SCA effects for grain yield were associated with high per se grain yield, which suggests that SCA was a good predictor of grain yield in this study. These crosses consisted of good × good and good × poor general combiners, which indicates that GCA was a good predictor of grain yield. Therefore, priority should be given for yield selection in progenies and hybridization of specific crosses with desirable SCA when breeding acid‐soil‐tolerant maize.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7319413
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73194132020-06-29 Line × tester analysis of maize grain yield under acid and non‐acid soil conditions Mutimaamba, Charles MacRobert, John Cairns, Jill E. Magorokosho, Cosmos Ndhlela, Thokozile Mukungurutse, Collis Minnaar‐Ontong, Adré Labuschagne, Maryke Crop Sci ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLES Soil acidity has received less attention than other biophysical stresses such as drought and low N, despite accounting for a considerable reduction in maize (Zea mays L.) productivity in many parts of southern Africa. The line × tester mating design was used to determine the general combining ability (GCA) for grain yield of 14 maize inbred lines and the specific combining ability (SCA) of their corresponding crosses. Thirty‐three single‐cross hybrids were evaluated under acid and optimum soils across 11 environments over three seasons. Across environments, mean grain yield reduction ranged from 11 to 37% due to low pH. Additive gene action was more important than nonadditive gene action for grain yield under both soil conditions. Tester GCA effects were larger for grain yield than GCA effects of lines and SCA effects of crosses for both soil conditions. Tester GCA effects were less sensitive to environmental fluctuations than line GCA effects and SCA effects of crosses. Cross combinations with desirable SCA effects for grain yield were associated with high per se grain yield, which suggests that SCA was a good predictor of grain yield in this study. These crosses consisted of good × good and good × poor general combiners, which indicates that GCA was a good predictor of grain yield. Therefore, priority should be given for yield selection in progenies and hybridization of specific crosses with desirable SCA when breeding acid‐soil‐tolerant maize. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-02-25 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7319413/ /pubmed/32612293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20009 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Crop Science published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Crop Science Society of America This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLES
Mutimaamba, Charles
MacRobert, John
Cairns, Jill E.
Magorokosho, Cosmos
Ndhlela, Thokozile
Mukungurutse, Collis
Minnaar‐Ontong, Adré
Labuschagne, Maryke
Line × tester analysis of maize grain yield under acid and non‐acid soil conditions
title Line × tester analysis of maize grain yield under acid and non‐acid soil conditions
title_full Line × tester analysis of maize grain yield under acid and non‐acid soil conditions
title_fullStr Line × tester analysis of maize grain yield under acid and non‐acid soil conditions
title_full_unstemmed Line × tester analysis of maize grain yield under acid and non‐acid soil conditions
title_short Line × tester analysis of maize grain yield under acid and non‐acid soil conditions
title_sort line × tester analysis of maize grain yield under acid and non‐acid soil conditions
topic ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7319413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32612293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20009
work_keys_str_mv AT mutimaambacharles linetesteranalysisofmaizegrainyieldunderacidandnonacidsoilconditions
AT macrobertjohn linetesteranalysisofmaizegrainyieldunderacidandnonacidsoilconditions
AT cairnsjille linetesteranalysisofmaizegrainyieldunderacidandnonacidsoilconditions
AT magorokoshocosmos linetesteranalysisofmaizegrainyieldunderacidandnonacidsoilconditions
AT ndhlelathokozile linetesteranalysisofmaizegrainyieldunderacidandnonacidsoilconditions
AT mukungurutsecollis linetesteranalysisofmaizegrainyieldunderacidandnonacidsoilconditions
AT minnaarontongadre linetesteranalysisofmaizegrainyieldunderacidandnonacidsoilconditions
AT labuschagnemaryke linetesteranalysisofmaizegrainyieldunderacidandnonacidsoilconditions