Cargando…

Sex‐related differences in contemporary biomarkers for heart failure: a review

The use of circulating biomarkers for heart failure (HF) is engrained in contemporary cardiovascular practice and provides objective information about various pathophysiological pathways associated with HF syndrome. However, biomarker profiles differ considerably among women and men. For instance, i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suthahar, Navin, Meems, Laura M.G., Ho, Jennifer E., de Boer, Rudolf A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7319414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32220046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.1771
_version_ 1783551043616899072
author Suthahar, Navin
Meems, Laura M.G.
Ho, Jennifer E.
de Boer, Rudolf A.
author_facet Suthahar, Navin
Meems, Laura M.G.
Ho, Jennifer E.
de Boer, Rudolf A.
author_sort Suthahar, Navin
collection PubMed
description The use of circulating biomarkers for heart failure (HF) is engrained in contemporary cardiovascular practice and provides objective information about various pathophysiological pathways associated with HF syndrome. However, biomarker profiles differ considerably among women and men. For instance, in the general population, markers of cardiac stretch (natriuretic peptides) and fibrosis (galectin‐3) are higher in women, whereas markers of cardiac injury (cardiac troponins) and inflammation (sST2) are higher in men. Such differences may reflect sex‐specific pathogenic processes associated with HF risk, but may also arise as a result of differences in sex hormone profiles and fat distribution. From a clinical perspective, sex‐related differences in biomarker levels may affect the objectivity of biomarkers in HF management because what is considered to be ‘normal’ in one sex may not be so in the other. The objectives of this review are, therefore: (i) to examine the sex‐specific dynamics of clinically relevant HF biomarkers in the general population, as well as in HF patients; (ii) to discuss the overlap between sex‐related and obesity‐related effects, and (iii) to identify knowledge gaps to stimulate research on sex‐related differences in HF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7319414
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73194142020-06-29 Sex‐related differences in contemporary biomarkers for heart failure: a review Suthahar, Navin Meems, Laura M.G. Ho, Jennifer E. de Boer, Rudolf A. Eur J Heart Fail Focus on Sex‐related Differences and on Ischaemic Heart Failure The use of circulating biomarkers for heart failure (HF) is engrained in contemporary cardiovascular practice and provides objective information about various pathophysiological pathways associated with HF syndrome. However, biomarker profiles differ considerably among women and men. For instance, in the general population, markers of cardiac stretch (natriuretic peptides) and fibrosis (galectin‐3) are higher in women, whereas markers of cardiac injury (cardiac troponins) and inflammation (sST2) are higher in men. Such differences may reflect sex‐specific pathogenic processes associated with HF risk, but may also arise as a result of differences in sex hormone profiles and fat distribution. From a clinical perspective, sex‐related differences in biomarker levels may affect the objectivity of biomarkers in HF management because what is considered to be ‘normal’ in one sex may not be so in the other. The objectives of this review are, therefore: (i) to examine the sex‐specific dynamics of clinically relevant HF biomarkers in the general population, as well as in HF patients; (ii) to discuss the overlap between sex‐related and obesity‐related effects, and (iii) to identify knowledge gaps to stimulate research on sex‐related differences in HF. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2020-03-27 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7319414/ /pubmed/32220046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.1771 Text en © 2020 The Authors. European Journal of Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Focus on Sex‐related Differences and on Ischaemic Heart Failure
Suthahar, Navin
Meems, Laura M.G.
Ho, Jennifer E.
de Boer, Rudolf A.
Sex‐related differences in contemporary biomarkers for heart failure: a review
title Sex‐related differences in contemporary biomarkers for heart failure: a review
title_full Sex‐related differences in contemporary biomarkers for heart failure: a review
title_fullStr Sex‐related differences in contemporary biomarkers for heart failure: a review
title_full_unstemmed Sex‐related differences in contemporary biomarkers for heart failure: a review
title_short Sex‐related differences in contemporary biomarkers for heart failure: a review
title_sort sex‐related differences in contemporary biomarkers for heart failure: a review
topic Focus on Sex‐related Differences and on Ischaemic Heart Failure
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7319414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32220046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.1771
work_keys_str_mv AT suthaharnavin sexrelateddifferencesincontemporarybiomarkersforheartfailureareview
AT meemslauramg sexrelateddifferencesincontemporarybiomarkersforheartfailureareview
AT hojennifere sexrelateddifferencesincontemporarybiomarkersforheartfailureareview
AT deboerrudolfa sexrelateddifferencesincontemporarybiomarkersforheartfailureareview