Cargando…
Sex‐related differences in contemporary biomarkers for heart failure: a review
The use of circulating biomarkers for heart failure (HF) is engrained in contemporary cardiovascular practice and provides objective information about various pathophysiological pathways associated with HF syndrome. However, biomarker profiles differ considerably among women and men. For instance, i...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7319414/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32220046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.1771 |
_version_ | 1783551043616899072 |
---|---|
author | Suthahar, Navin Meems, Laura M.G. Ho, Jennifer E. de Boer, Rudolf A. |
author_facet | Suthahar, Navin Meems, Laura M.G. Ho, Jennifer E. de Boer, Rudolf A. |
author_sort | Suthahar, Navin |
collection | PubMed |
description | The use of circulating biomarkers for heart failure (HF) is engrained in contemporary cardiovascular practice and provides objective information about various pathophysiological pathways associated with HF syndrome. However, biomarker profiles differ considerably among women and men. For instance, in the general population, markers of cardiac stretch (natriuretic peptides) and fibrosis (galectin‐3) are higher in women, whereas markers of cardiac injury (cardiac troponins) and inflammation (sST2) are higher in men. Such differences may reflect sex‐specific pathogenic processes associated with HF risk, but may also arise as a result of differences in sex hormone profiles and fat distribution. From a clinical perspective, sex‐related differences in biomarker levels may affect the objectivity of biomarkers in HF management because what is considered to be ‘normal’ in one sex may not be so in the other. The objectives of this review are, therefore: (i) to examine the sex‐specific dynamics of clinically relevant HF biomarkers in the general population, as well as in HF patients; (ii) to discuss the overlap between sex‐related and obesity‐related effects, and (iii) to identify knowledge gaps to stimulate research on sex‐related differences in HF. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7319414 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73194142020-06-29 Sex‐related differences in contemporary biomarkers for heart failure: a review Suthahar, Navin Meems, Laura M.G. Ho, Jennifer E. de Boer, Rudolf A. Eur J Heart Fail Focus on Sex‐related Differences and on Ischaemic Heart Failure The use of circulating biomarkers for heart failure (HF) is engrained in contemporary cardiovascular practice and provides objective information about various pathophysiological pathways associated with HF syndrome. However, biomarker profiles differ considerably among women and men. For instance, in the general population, markers of cardiac stretch (natriuretic peptides) and fibrosis (galectin‐3) are higher in women, whereas markers of cardiac injury (cardiac troponins) and inflammation (sST2) are higher in men. Such differences may reflect sex‐specific pathogenic processes associated with HF risk, but may also arise as a result of differences in sex hormone profiles and fat distribution. From a clinical perspective, sex‐related differences in biomarker levels may affect the objectivity of biomarkers in HF management because what is considered to be ‘normal’ in one sex may not be so in the other. The objectives of this review are, therefore: (i) to examine the sex‐specific dynamics of clinically relevant HF biomarkers in the general population, as well as in HF patients; (ii) to discuss the overlap between sex‐related and obesity‐related effects, and (iii) to identify knowledge gaps to stimulate research on sex‐related differences in HF. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2020-03-27 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7319414/ /pubmed/32220046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.1771 Text en © 2020 The Authors. European Journal of Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Focus on Sex‐related Differences and on Ischaemic Heart Failure Suthahar, Navin Meems, Laura M.G. Ho, Jennifer E. de Boer, Rudolf A. Sex‐related differences in contemporary biomarkers for heart failure: a review |
title | Sex‐related differences in contemporary biomarkers for heart failure: a review |
title_full | Sex‐related differences in contemporary biomarkers for heart failure: a review |
title_fullStr | Sex‐related differences in contemporary biomarkers for heart failure: a review |
title_full_unstemmed | Sex‐related differences in contemporary biomarkers for heart failure: a review |
title_short | Sex‐related differences in contemporary biomarkers for heart failure: a review |
title_sort | sex‐related differences in contemporary biomarkers for heart failure: a review |
topic | Focus on Sex‐related Differences and on Ischaemic Heart Failure |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7319414/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32220046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.1771 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT suthaharnavin sexrelateddifferencesincontemporarybiomarkersforheartfailureareview AT meemslauramg sexrelateddifferencesincontemporarybiomarkersforheartfailureareview AT hojennifere sexrelateddifferencesincontemporarybiomarkersforheartfailureareview AT deboerrudolfa sexrelateddifferencesincontemporarybiomarkersforheartfailureareview |