Cargando…

Analysis of Secure Apps for Daily Clinical Use by German Orthopedic Surgeons: Searching for the "Needle in a Haystack"

BACKGROUND: It is undeniable that appropriate smartphone apps offer enormous opportunities for dealing with future challenges in orthopedic surgery and public health, in general. However, it is still unclear how the apps currently available in the two major app stores can be used in daily clinical r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dittrich, Florian, Beck, Sascha, Harren, Anna Katharina, Reinecke, Felix, Serong, Sebastian, Jung, Jochen, Back, David Alexander, Wolf, Milan, Landgraeber, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7319594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32379054
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/17085
_version_ 1783551086121975808
author Dittrich, Florian
Beck, Sascha
Harren, Anna Katharina
Reinecke, Felix
Serong, Sebastian
Jung, Jochen
Back, David Alexander
Wolf, Milan
Landgraeber, Stefan
author_facet Dittrich, Florian
Beck, Sascha
Harren, Anna Katharina
Reinecke, Felix
Serong, Sebastian
Jung, Jochen
Back, David Alexander
Wolf, Milan
Landgraeber, Stefan
author_sort Dittrich, Florian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is undeniable that appropriate smartphone apps offer enormous opportunities for dealing with future challenges in orthopedic surgery and public health, in general. However, it is still unclear how the apps currently available in the two major app stores can be used in daily clinical routine by German orthopedic surgeons. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to gain evidence regarding the quantity and quality of apps available in the two major app stores and their suitability for use by orthopedic surgeons in Germany. METHODS: We conducted a systematic, keyword-based app store screening to obtain evidence concerning the quantity and quality of commercially available apps. Apps that met the inclusion criteria were evaluated using the app synopsis–checklist for users and the German Mobile App Rating Scale for secure use, trustworthiness, and quality. RESULTS: The investigation revealed serious shortcomings regarding legal and medical aspects. Furthermore, most apps turned out to be useless and unsuitable for the clinical field of application (4242/4249, 99.84%). Finally, 7 trustworthy and high-quality apps (7/4249, 0.16%) offering secure usage in the daily clinical routine of orthopedists were identified. These apps mainly focused on education (5/7). None of them were CE (Conformité Européenne) certified. Moreover, there are no studies providing evidence that these apps have any positive use whatsoever. CONCLUSIONS: The data obtained in our study suggest that the number of trustworthy and high-quality apps on offer is extremely low. Nowadays, finding appropriate apps in the fast-moving, complex, dynamic, and rudimentarily controlled app stores is most challenging. Promising approaches, for example, systematic app store screenings, app-rating developments, reviews or app libraries, and the creation of consistent standards have been established. However, further efforts are necessary to ensure that these innovative mobile health apps not only provide the correct information but are also safe to use in daily clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7319594
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73195942020-07-01 Analysis of Secure Apps for Daily Clinical Use by German Orthopedic Surgeons: Searching for the "Needle in a Haystack" Dittrich, Florian Beck, Sascha Harren, Anna Katharina Reinecke, Felix Serong, Sebastian Jung, Jochen Back, David Alexander Wolf, Milan Landgraeber, Stefan JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Original Paper BACKGROUND: It is undeniable that appropriate smartphone apps offer enormous opportunities for dealing with future challenges in orthopedic surgery and public health, in general. However, it is still unclear how the apps currently available in the two major app stores can be used in daily clinical routine by German orthopedic surgeons. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to gain evidence regarding the quantity and quality of apps available in the two major app stores and their suitability for use by orthopedic surgeons in Germany. METHODS: We conducted a systematic, keyword-based app store screening to obtain evidence concerning the quantity and quality of commercially available apps. Apps that met the inclusion criteria were evaluated using the app synopsis–checklist for users and the German Mobile App Rating Scale for secure use, trustworthiness, and quality. RESULTS: The investigation revealed serious shortcomings regarding legal and medical aspects. Furthermore, most apps turned out to be useless and unsuitable for the clinical field of application (4242/4249, 99.84%). Finally, 7 trustworthy and high-quality apps (7/4249, 0.16%) offering secure usage in the daily clinical routine of orthopedists were identified. These apps mainly focused on education (5/7). None of them were CE (Conformité Européenne) certified. Moreover, there are no studies providing evidence that these apps have any positive use whatsoever. CONCLUSIONS: The data obtained in our study suggest that the number of trustworthy and high-quality apps on offer is extremely low. Nowadays, finding appropriate apps in the fast-moving, complex, dynamic, and rudimentarily controlled app stores is most challenging. Promising approaches, for example, systematic app store screenings, app-rating developments, reviews or app libraries, and the creation of consistent standards have been established. However, further efforts are necessary to ensure that these innovative mobile health apps not only provide the correct information but are also safe to use in daily clinical practice. JMIR Publications 2020-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7319594/ /pubmed/32379054 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/17085 Text en ©Florian Dittrich, Sascha Beck, Anna Katharina Harren, Felix Reinecke, Sebastian Serong, Jochen Jung, David Alexander Back, Milan Wolf, Stefan Landgraeber. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 07.05.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Dittrich, Florian
Beck, Sascha
Harren, Anna Katharina
Reinecke, Felix
Serong, Sebastian
Jung, Jochen
Back, David Alexander
Wolf, Milan
Landgraeber, Stefan
Analysis of Secure Apps for Daily Clinical Use by German Orthopedic Surgeons: Searching for the "Needle in a Haystack"
title Analysis of Secure Apps for Daily Clinical Use by German Orthopedic Surgeons: Searching for the "Needle in a Haystack"
title_full Analysis of Secure Apps for Daily Clinical Use by German Orthopedic Surgeons: Searching for the "Needle in a Haystack"
title_fullStr Analysis of Secure Apps for Daily Clinical Use by German Orthopedic Surgeons: Searching for the "Needle in a Haystack"
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Secure Apps for Daily Clinical Use by German Orthopedic Surgeons: Searching for the "Needle in a Haystack"
title_short Analysis of Secure Apps for Daily Clinical Use by German Orthopedic Surgeons: Searching for the "Needle in a Haystack"
title_sort analysis of secure apps for daily clinical use by german orthopedic surgeons: searching for the "needle in a haystack"
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7319594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32379054
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/17085
work_keys_str_mv AT dittrichflorian analysisofsecureappsfordailyclinicalusebygermanorthopedicsurgeonssearchingfortheneedleinahaystack
AT becksascha analysisofsecureappsfordailyclinicalusebygermanorthopedicsurgeonssearchingfortheneedleinahaystack
AT harrenannakatharina analysisofsecureappsfordailyclinicalusebygermanorthopedicsurgeonssearchingfortheneedleinahaystack
AT reineckefelix analysisofsecureappsfordailyclinicalusebygermanorthopedicsurgeonssearchingfortheneedleinahaystack
AT serongsebastian analysisofsecureappsfordailyclinicalusebygermanorthopedicsurgeonssearchingfortheneedleinahaystack
AT jungjochen analysisofsecureappsfordailyclinicalusebygermanorthopedicsurgeonssearchingfortheneedleinahaystack
AT backdavidalexander analysisofsecureappsfordailyclinicalusebygermanorthopedicsurgeonssearchingfortheneedleinahaystack
AT wolfmilan analysisofsecureappsfordailyclinicalusebygermanorthopedicsurgeonssearchingfortheneedleinahaystack
AT landgraeberstefan analysisofsecureappsfordailyclinicalusebygermanorthopedicsurgeonssearchingfortheneedleinahaystack